Conclusion: A Continuing Dilemma

  • Ann Taylor Allen


Between 1970 and the present lies a great deal of history, which included many changes in the status of women and of mothers. Nonetheless, the old problems persist. And of all these problems, the maternal dilemma is among the most intractable. The difficulty of reconciling maternal and familial responsibilities with individual aspirations is still a major obstacle to the equality of women in Western Europe and elsewhere. In this book, we have seen how the maternal dilemma was defined and debated by feminists during the early and middle years of the twentieth century. What light can this history throw on the present?


Europe Income Infertility Defend 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York and London: Routledge, 1990), 14.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    For example, Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, “Feminism is Not the Story of my Life:” How Today’s Feminist Elite has Lost Touch with the Real Concerns of Women (New York: Nan A. Talese, 1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellen Key, Über Liebe und Ehe, trans. Frances Maro (Berlin: Fischer, 1906), 222; Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex [1949], trans. H.M. Parshley (New York: Vintage, 1989), 513.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cf. Toril Moi, What is a Woman? And Other Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 3–250.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carole Pateman, “Equality, Difference, Subordination: The Politics of Motherhood and Women’s Citizenship,” in Gisela Bock and Susan James, eds., Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics, and Female Subjectivity (London and New York: Routledge, 1992), 17–31 (quotation 29).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim, Die Kinderfrage: Frauen zwischen Kinderwunsch und Unabhängigkeit (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1997), 173.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbara Helfferich, “Wise Women Shaping the European Union,” LOLA press: International Feminist Journal (April 30, 2000): 10–12 (quotation 10).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peter McDonald and Rebecca Kippen, “Labor Supply Prospects in 16 Developed Countries,” Population and Development Review 27 (March 2001): 1–32 (chart in appendix).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Commission, Directorate General for Employment, Industrial Relations, and Social Affairs, “European Union Progress Report: Implementation of the Medium-Term Social Action Programme, 1995–97,” Women’s International Network News, July 31, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fran Hosken, “France: Toward Equality–Key Figures,” Women’s International Network News (July 31, 2000): 67–81.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fran Hosken, “Women Setting New Priorities: A Study of Western European Women’s Views on Work, Family and Society,” Women’s International Network News (October 31, 1996): 70–72.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Fran Hosken, “Women’s Status and Work in the European Community,” Women’s International Network News, October 31, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    Jane Lewis and Gertrude Aström, “Equality, Difference, and State Welfare: Labor Market and Family Policies in Sweden,” Feminist Studies 18 (Spring 1992): 59–88.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    “European Union Progress Report”; Yvonne Knibiehler, La Révolution maternelle: Femmes, maternité, citoyenneté depuis 1945 (Paris: Perrin, 1997), 335–344.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    Philippe Ariès, “Two Successive Motivations for the Declining Birth-Rate in the West,” Population and Development Review 6 (December 1980): 645–650 (quotation 650).Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    Roger Cooter, “In the Name of the Child Beyond,” in Marijke Gijswijt-Hofstra and Hilary Marland, eds., Cultures of Child Health in Britain and the Netherlands in the Twentieth Century (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2003), 287–296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ann Taylor Allen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Taylor Allen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations