From Motherhood to Sex Roles: The Postwar Era, 1945–1970

  • Ann Taylor Allen

Abstract

In the years that immediately followed World War II, the ideology of patriotic motherhood seemed to have reached its apogee. The trend toward young marriages and large families that was known as the “baby boom” affirmed life and hope after the death and despair of the war years. Not only did many women leave their wartime jobs for full-time motherhood, but new welfare-state policies, some of which fulfilled long-standing feminist demands, supported mothers, children, and families. Many commentators predicted the imminent demise of feminism. But the opposite occurred. Within a quarter of a century, a new women’s movement energized a vocal group among the younger generation. At the same time, the development of new contraceptive techniques and increases in women’s educational level and workforce participation seemed to usher in a new era in human history, when motherhood would become an option to be chosen rather than a destiny to be accepted.

Keywords

Fatigue Europe Assure Boiling Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Karen Offen, European Feminisms: A Political History (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000), 359–377Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    Christine Bard, Les filles de Marianne: Histoire des féminismes 1914–1940 (Paris: Fayard, 1995), 383–433.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Bard, Les filles de Marianne, 439–448; Martin Pugh, Women and the Women’s Movement in Britain, 1914–1959 (Houndmills: Macmillan, 1992), 264–285.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Victoria de Grazia, “How Mussolini Ruled Italian Women,” in Georges Duby, Michelle Perrot, and Françoise Thébaud, eds., A History of Women in the West, Vol. 5; Françoise Thébaud, ed., Toward a Cultural Identity in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Belknap, 1994), 120–148.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Gisela Bock, “Nazi Gender Policies and Women’s History,” in Duby, Perrot, and Thébaud, eds., History of Women in the West, Vol. 5, 149–177; Gisela Bock, “Antinatalism, Maternity, and Paternity in National Socialist Racism,” in Gisela Bock and Pat Thane, eds., Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 1880–1950s (London and New York: Routledge, 1991), 233–255.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Irmgard Weyrather, Muttertag und Mutterkreuz: Der Kult um die “deutsche Mutter” im Nationalsozialismus (Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1993).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Leila Rupp, Mobilizing Women for War: German and American Propaganda, 1939–1944 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978), 115–136.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Original version of the speech: Heinrich Himmler, “Der Sieg der Frauen,” Das Schwarze Korps, January 4, 1940.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    BAK, Briefe von Frauenfürerinnen und Dichterinnen an Dorothee van Velsen, 1911–1953: Velsen-Bäumer, March 31, 1940; Bäumer-van Velsen, April 4, 1940; Angelika Schaser, Helene Lange und Gertrud Bäumer: Eine politische Lebensgemeinschaft (Köln: Böhlau Verlag, 2000), 314–336.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    See e.g., Elizabeth D. Heineman, What Difference Does a Husband Make? Women and Marital Status in Nazi and Postwar Germany (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999), 75–107Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Robert G. Moeller, Protecting Motherhood: Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar West Germany (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993), 8–37Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Claire Duchen, Women’s Rights and Women’s Lives in France, 1944–68 (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), 64–67Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    Miriam Mafai, L’apprendistato della politica: Le donne italiane nel dopoguerra (Rome: Editori riunite, 1979), 118–142.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    Susan Pedersen, Family, Dependence and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britain and France, 1914–1945 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 413–426Google Scholar
  15. 10.
    Wiebke Kolbe, Elternschaft im Wohlfahrtsstaat: Schweden und die Bundesrepublik im Vergleich, 1945–2000 (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2002), 29–64.Google Scholar
  16. 12.
    D.V. Glass, “Fertility Trends in Europe since the Second World War,” Population Studies 22 (March 1968): 103–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 12.
    Yvonne Knibiehler, La Révolution maternelle: Femmes, maternité, citoyenneté depuis 1945 (Paris: Perrin, 1997), 21–57.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    Helmut Schelsky, Wandlungen der deutschen Familie in der Gegenwart: Darstellung und Deutung einer empirisch-soziologischen Tatbestandsaufnahme (Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1967), 18–19; see also Moeller, The Protection of Motherhood 109–141; and Kolbe, Elternschaft im Wohlfahrtsstaat 65–85.Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    Denise Riley, War in the Nursery: Theories of the Child and Mother (London: Virago, 1983), 159Google Scholar
  20. 15.
    C. Alison McIntosh, “Low Fertility and Liberal Democracy in Western Europe,” Population and Development Review 7 (June 1981): 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    Elazar Barkan, The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 341–346Google Scholar
  22. 16.
    Richard A. Soloway, Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birth-Rate in Twentieth-Century Britain (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1990), 343–363.Google Scholar
  23. 17.
    Christina Hardyment, Perfect Parents: Baby-Care Advice Past and Present (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 214–220.Google Scholar
  24. 18.
    T.W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford, The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper Brothers, 1950), 337–389; see also Riley, War in the Nursery 42–79.Google Scholar
  25. 19.
    Janet Sayers, Mothers of Psychoanalysis: Helene Deutsch, Karen Homey, Anna Freud, Melanie Klein (New York: Norton, 1991), 168–174.Google Scholar
  26. 20.
    John Bowlby, Maternal Care and Mental Health: A Report Prepared on Behalf of the World Health Oritauization to the United Nations Programme for the Welfare of Homeless Children (Geneva: WHO, 1952), 158, 11–12; on postwar child-rearing see also Hardyment, Perfect Parents 223–293.Google Scholar
  27. 21.
    Elizabeth Wilson, Only Halfway to Paradise: Women in Post-War Britain, 1945–1968 (London and New York: Tavistock Publications, 1980), 187.Google Scholar
  28. 22.
    Benjamin Spock, The Common-Sense Book of Baby and Child Care (New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce, 1945), 19. Some early European editions were: Baby-en kinderverzorging (Amsterdam: Contact, 1950); Comment soigner et éduquer son enfant (Verviers: Editions Gérard, 1952); Il bambino: come si cura et come si alleva (Milano: Longanesi, 1954); Säuglings-und Kinderpflege (Frankfurt: Ullstein, 1957); Tu hijo (Madrid: Daimon, 1968). On the influence of Spock in France see Knibiehler, La Révolution maternelle 73.Google Scholar
  29. 24.
    Angus McLaren, A History of Contraception from Antiquity to the Present Day (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), 228–239; Glass, “Fertility Trends in Europe.”Google Scholar
  30. 25.
    See data on various countries in Évelyne Sullerot, Women, Society and Change, trans. Margaret Scotford Archer (New York: McGraw Hill, 1971), 48–49Google Scholar
  31. 25.
    Franca Bimbi, “Gender, ‘ Gift Relationship,’ and Welfare-state Cultures in Italy,” in Jane Lewis, ed., Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993), 138–169.Google Scholar
  32. 26.
    Eric D. Weitz, “The Heroic Man and the Ever-Changing Woman: Gender and Politics in European Communism, 1917–1950,” in Laura L. Frader and Sonya O. Rose, eds., Gender and Class in Modern Europe (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), 311–352; see also the discussion of communism and feminism in Offen, European Feminisms 380–393.Google Scholar
  33. 27.
    Mafai, L’apprendistato 118–142; Lucia Chiavola Birnbaum, Liberazione della donna: Feminism in Italy (Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 1986), 57–59; Offen, European Feminisms 382–383.Google Scholar
  34. 30.
    Mattei Dogan and Jacques Narbonne, Les Françaises face â la politique: Comportement politique et condition sociale (Paris: Armand Colin, 1955), 48.Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Sylvie Chaperon, Les Années Beauvoir, 1945–1970 (Paris: Fayard, 2000), 364–365Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Denise de Weerdt, En de Vrouwen? Vrouw, vrouwenbeweging en ferriui. cnae in Belgic, 1830–1960 (Gent: Masreelfonds, 1980), 169–179; Birnbaum, Liberazione della donna 81.Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    Leontine Young, Out of Wedlock: A Study of the Problems of the Unmarried Mother and her Child (New York: McGraw Hill, 1954), 21–130, 169–242. On Young’s influence in BritainGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    see Martine Spensky, “Producers of Legitimacy: Homes for Unmarried Mothers in the 1950s,” in Carole Smart, ed., Regulating Womanhood: Historical Essays on Marriage, Motherhood, and Sexuality (London and New York: Routledge, 1992), 100–118.Google Scholar
  39. 44.
    Andrée Michel and Geneviève Texier, La Condition de la française d’aujourd’hui, Vol. 1 (Paris: Editions Gonthier, 1964), 42; Duchen, Women’s Rights and Women’s Lives 96–127.Google Scholar
  40. 45.
    Rochefort, Les Petits enfants du siècle (Paris: Grasset, 1962), 110–111; Michel and Texier, La Condition de la française Vol. 1, 52–70.Google Scholar
  41. 48.
    Doris H. Linder, Crusader for Sex Education: Elise Ottesen-Jensen (1886–1973) in Scandinavia and on the International Scene (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1996), 186–187.Google Scholar
  42. 49.
    Jan de B ruij n, Geschiednis van de abortus in Nederland: Een Analyse van opvattingen en discussies 1600–1979 (Amsterdam: van Gennep, 1979), 149–184; D.V. Glass, “Family Planning Programmes and Action in Western Europe,” Population Studies 19 (March 1966): 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 51.
    Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex [1949], trans. H.M. Parshley (New York: Vintage, 1989), 491.Google Scholar
  44. 52.
    Deirdre Bair, Simone de Beauvoir: A Biography (New York: Summit Books, 1990), 382–386.Google Scholar
  45. 53.
    Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 484, 485, 490, 492; see also Toril Moi, What is a Woman? And Other Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 121–252.Google Scholar
  46. 55.
    Chaperon, Les Années Beauvoir, 237–268; Kniebiehler, La Révolution maternelle, 141–151; Duchen, Women’s Rights and Women’s Lives, 117–146; Catherine Valabrègue, Contrôle des naissances et planning familial (Paris: Editions de la Table Ronde, 1960).Google Scholar
  47. 55.
    See also Jacques Danzelot, The Policing of Families, trans. Robert Hurley (New York: Pantheon Books, 1979), 194–198.Google Scholar
  48. 56.
    Évelyne Sullerot, La Vie des femmes (Paris: Editions Gonthier, 1965), 68.Google Scholar
  49. 57.
    Marie Andrée Lagroua Weill-Hallé, Pour la pillule et le planningfamilial (Nancy: Berger-Levrault, 1967), 9.Google Scholar
  50. 66.
    Birnbaum, Liberazione della donna 89; Prue Chamberlayne, “Women and the State: Changes in Roles and Rights in France, West Germany, Italy, and Britain, 1970–1990,” in Lewis, ed., Women and Social Policies 170–193; Franca Bimbi, “Tre generazioni di donne: Le trasformazioni dei modelli de identità femminile in Italia,” in A. Galoppini, F. Cambi, F. Bimbi, A. Bertondini, F. Pristinger, S. Ulivieri, A Porcheddu, G. Campani, and C. Covato, Educazione e ruolo femminile: La condizione delle donne in Italia dal dopoguerra a oggi (Scanducci, Firenze: Nuova Italia, 1992), 65–98.Google Scholar
  51. 69.
    Caitriona Clear, Women of the House: Women’s Household Work in Ireland, 1926–1961: Discourses, Experiences, and Memories (Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 2000), 100, 122–123; Pauline Conroy Jackson, “Managing the Mothers: the Case of Ireland,” in Lewis, Women and Social Policies 72–91.Google Scholar
  52. 70.
    Daniel Callahan, Abortion: Law, Choice and Morality (London: Macmillan, 1979), 184–217, 142–148.Google Scholar
  53. 72.
    Philippe Ariès, “Two Successive Motivations for the Declining Birth-Rate in the West,” Population and Developmcut Review 6 (December 1980): 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 73.
    Evelyne Sullerot, Demain les fi ormes (Paris: Robert Lafont, 1965), 48.Google Scholar
  55. 75.
    Alva Myrdal and Viola Klein, Women’s Two Roles: Home and Work (London: Routledge, 1956).Google Scholar
  56. 76.
    Cf. Schelsky, Wandlungen der deutschen Familie, 335–350; Eva M. Hubback, The Population of Britain (West Drayton, Middlesex and New York: Penguin, 1947), 213.Google Scholar
  57. 78.
    Viola Klein, Britain’s Married Women Workers [1965] (London: Routledge, 1998), 26–83.Google Scholar
  58. 80.
    IIAV, Dossier “ ,‘ Arbeid van de vrouw met gezinsverpflichtingen,’ houdende stukken betreffend arbeid van de vrouw buiten het eigen gezin en arbeid van de gehuwde vrouw buitenhuis,” in Hettie Pott-Buter and Kea Tijdens, eds., Vrouwen, leven en werk in die twintigste eeuw (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998), 169.Google Scholar
  59. 81.
    Pearl Jephcott, Married Women Working (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1962), 19.Google Scholar
  60. 83.
    Sissela Bok, Alva Myrdal: A Daughter’s Memoir (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1991), 201.Google Scholar
  61. 85.
    Schellekens-Ligthart, quoted in Marjolein Morée, “Mijn kinderen hebben er nets van gemerkt:” Buitenhuis werkende moeders tussen 1950 en nu (Utrecht: Jan van Arkel, 1992), 73–74.Google Scholar
  62. 86.
    Elisabeth Joris, “Die fünfzigerjahre-Das Werk-Die Autorin,” in Iris von Roten, Frauen im Laufgitter: Offene Worte zur Stellung der Frau [1958] (Zürich: eFeFVerlag, 1991), 580–588Google Scholar
  63. 86.
    Gisela Kaplan, Contemporary Western Feminism (New York: New York University Press, 1992), 16.Google Scholar
  64. 88.
    See Elisabeth Pfeil, Die Berufstätigkeit von Müttern: Eine empirisch-soziologische Erhebung an 900 Müttern aus vollständigen Familien (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1961); Moeller, Protecting Motherhood 174.Google Scholar
  65. 90.
    See Évelyne Sullerot, Histoire et sociologie du travail féminin (Paris: Editions Gonthier, 1968), 340–353; Pfeil, Berufstätigkeit 83, 149; Klein, Britain’s Married Women Workers 26–83; Jephcott, Married Women Working 100.Google Scholar
  66. 91.
    Judith Hubback, Wives who Went to College (London: Heinemann, 1957), 53, 64.Google Scholar
  67. 92.
    Sondra R. Herman, “Dialogue: Children, Feminism, and Power: Alva Myrdal and Swedish Reform, 1929–1956,” Journal of Women’s History 4 (Fall 1992): 82–112.Google Scholar
  68. 92.
    Viola Klein, The Feminine Character: History of an Ideology [1946] (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1972).Google Scholar
  69. 98.
    Ute Frevert, Women in German History: From Bourgeois Emancipation to Sexual Liberation, trans. Stuart MacKinnon Evans (Oxford: Berg, 1988), 253–304Google Scholar
  70. 98.
    Merith Niehuss, Familie, Frau und Gesellschaft: Studien zur Strukturgeschichte der Familie in Westdeutschland, 1945–1960 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2001), 214–288.Google Scholar
  71. 99.
    For example: Edith Hinze, “Arbeit und Beruf in der Sicht erwerbstätiger Mütter,” Zentralblattf it Arbeitswissenschaft 16 (August/September 1962): 132–135.Google Scholar
  72. 103.
    Alva Myrdal, “Foreword,” in Edmund Dahlström, ed., The Changing Roles of Men and Women trans. Gunilla and Steven Anderman (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1962), 9–15 (quotation 9).Google Scholar
  73. 113.
    Donald Winnicott, The Child, the Family, and the Outside World (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969), 26–27, quoted byGoogle Scholar
  74. 113.
    Yvonne Schütze, Die Gute Mutter: Zur Geschichte des normativen Musters “Mutterliebe” (Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag, 1986), 91; on postwar child-rearing theory see Schütze, Die Gute Mutter 86–103.Google Scholar
  75. 114.
    Nancy Pottishman Weiss, “Mother, the Invention of Necessity: Dr. Benjamin Spock’s Baby and Child Care,” American Quarterly 29 (Winter 1977): 519–546.Google Scholar
  76. 115.
    Helene Deutsch, The Psychology of Women: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation Vol. 2 (New York: Grune and Stratton, 1945), 282; see also Sayers, Mothers of Psychoanalysis 67–75.Google Scholar
  77. 119.
    Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 484; see also Toril Moi, Simone de Beauvoir: The Making of an Intellectual Woman (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), 148–178.Google Scholar
  78. 123.
    Beauvoir, The Second Sex; cf Alison S. Fell, Liberty, Equality, Maternity in Beauvoir, Leduc, and Ernaux (Oxford: Legenda, 2003), 78–115Google Scholar
  79. 123.
    Yolanda Astarita Patterson, “Simone de Beauvoir and the Demystification of Motherhood,” Yale French Studies 72 (1986): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 125.
    See e.g., Elizabeth Fallaize, ed., Simone de Beauvoir: A Critical Reader (London and New York: Routledge, 1998); and Moi, What is a Woman? 59–84.Google Scholar
  81. 130.
    Interview with Ann Oakley, in Penny Forster and Imogen Sutton, eds., Daughters of de Beauvoir (London: The Women’s Press, 1989), 67–76 (quotation 69).Google Scholar
  82. 134.
    Interview with Val Charlton, in Michelene Wandor, Once a Feminist: Stories of a Generation (London: Virago, 1990), 161–162.Google Scholar
  83. 136.
    Juliet Mitchell, “Women: The Longest Revolution” [1966], in Juliet Mitchell, Women: The Longest Revolution (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984), 17–54 (quotation 33).Google Scholar
  84. 137.
    Penelope Mortimer, The Pumpkin Eater (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964), 123.Google Scholar
  85. 139.
    See e.g., A.J. Schellekens-Ligthart, Nadcre verkenningen t.a.v. de problematiek van de buitenhuis werkendegehuwde vroun’ (S’Gravenhage: Ned. Huishoudrad, 1961), 68–87.Google Scholar
  86. 141.
    Ase Grude Skard, “Maternal Deprivation: The Research and Its Implications,” Journal of Marriage and the Family 27 (August 1964): 333–343 (quotation 341).Google Scholar
  87. 147.
    Catherine Valabrègue, La Condition masculine (Paris: Bibliothèque Payot, 1968), 155–175.Google Scholar
  88. 150.
    Margaret Mead, Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World (New York: William Morrow, 1949), 381.Google Scholar
  89. 153.
    Françoise d’Eaubonne, Le Complexe de Diane: Érotisme ou féminisme (Paris: René Julliard, 1951), 292.Google Scholar
  90. 156.
    Yolanda A. Patterson, Simone de Beauvoir and the Demystification ofMotherhood (London: UMI Research Press, 1989), 338. Cf. Fell, Liberty, Equality, Maternity 78–115.Google Scholar
  91. 157.
    Simone de Beauvoir, The Prime of Life [1960], trans. Peter Green (Cleveland, OH: Meridian, 1966), 66–67.Google Scholar
  92. 158.
    Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (London: Bantam, 1971), 248.Google Scholar
  93. 160.
    Herrad Schenk, Die feministische Herausforderung: 150 jahre Frauenbewegung in Deutschland (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1992), 87.Google Scholar
  94. 165.
    Rivolta Femminile, “Manifesto” [1970], in Paola Bono and Sandra Kemp, eds., Italian Feminist Thought: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991), 37–40 (quotation 38).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ann Taylor Allen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann Taylor Allen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations