The Phoneur: Mobile Commerce and the Digital Pedagogies of the Wireless Web

  • Robert Luke


Corporate data collectors track every move you make on the electronic landscape, recording your m-commerce phone habits only to sell them back to you through advertising that entices you to spend more. Think of these phones as a kind of remote-controlled radio collar—like the ones scientists use to monitor the behaviour of the animals they study.

The move toward mobile commerce, or m-commerce, still nascent in North America, is an attempt to create a worldwide datastructure built on the premise of consumption. The habit@ is the electronic environment—and the sociocultural conditions—of the wireless and worldwide webs (W4 and W3). Within it, “The structures constitutive of a particular type of environment … produce habitus, systems of durable, transposable dispositions, structured structures predisposed to function as structuring structures” (Bourdieu, 1977, p. 72; 1990). These structures are the invisible data collection mechanisms that track user habits through the data flows of electronic identity formation, and sell these habits back to the user in the form of “push” advertising.2 “There is no fixed self, only the habit of looking for one” (Wise, 2000, p. 303), and this habit of looking is our habit@on-line. The wireless habit@ is constituted in the patterns of our mobile browsing behavior, which is in turn repackaged and re-presented as a demographic representation of how we will engage the spending process, how we will actualize ourselves as desiring-machines (Deleuze and Guattari, 1983). The habit@ is becoming the marker of social distinction.


Mobile Phone Cell Phone Mobile Capital Social Difference Digital Literacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Accenture. (2001). “Imagining the EFuture.” Accenture.Google Scholar
  2. Agre, Phil. “Surveillance and Capture: Two Models of Privacy.” The Information Society 10 (1994): 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AOL. “Welcome to AOL Anywhere.” America Online, Inc. <>.
  4. Appadurai, Arjun. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Public Worlds, vol. 1. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: Texas University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. Baudrillard, jean, (1984), Simulations: The Precession of Simulacra. Trans. Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman. London: Foreign Agents.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, Walter. (1999). The Arcades Project. Trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Binsted, Kim. “Mobile Magic: The Future of Mobile Connectivity.” Presented at the Interactive Arena 2000–2001. The Design Exchange, 234 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, May 1, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. —. (1980). The Logic of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. Burbules, Nicholas. (2000). “Does the Internet Constitute a Global Educational Community?” In Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives, ed, Nicholas Burbules and Carlos Alberto Torre. Social Theory, Education and Cultural Change. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 323–356.Google Scholar
  12. Castells, Manuel. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 1. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. —. (1997). The Power of Identity. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 2. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, Roger. “The Digital Persona and Its Application to Data Surveillance.” The Information Society 10 (1994): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CompuServe. “My CompuServe.” CompuServe Interactive Services, Inc. <>.
  16. de Certeau, Michel. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. (1972). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen Lane. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. Dickson, Peter. “Understanding the Trade Winds: The Global Evolution of Production, Consumption, and the Internet.” Journal of Consumer Research 27:1 (June 2000): 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Excite. “My Excite Start Page.” At Home Corporation. <>.
  20. Ferguson, Priscilla Parkhurst. (1994). “The Flâneur on and Off the Streets of Paris.” In The Flâneur, ed. Keith Tester. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 22–42.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, Michel. (1997). “Panopticism.” In Rethinking Architecture Today: A Reader in Cultural Theory, ed. N. Leach. London: Routledge, pp. 356–379.Google Scholar
  22. Friere, Paulo. (1968). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Trans. Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Seabury Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  23. Frisby, David. (1994). “The Flâneur in Social Theory.” In The Flâneur, ed. Keith Tester. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 81–110.Google Scholar
  24. Galloway, Matt. “Absolute Mobility.” Now (Toronto) April 26–May 2, 2001: 39.Google Scholar
  25. Giroux, Henry (2000). Impure Acts: The Practical Politics of Cultural Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  26. Goodman, Ellen. “Cell Phone Speech Far from Free.” Reporter-News.Com. <>.
  27. Graham, Stephen. (1999). “Geographies of Surveillant Simulation.” In Virtual Geographies: Bodies, Space and Relations, ed. Mike Crang, Phil Crang, and Jon May. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 131–148.Google Scholar
  28. Haskins, Walaika. “Take It To The Streets.” PC Magazine 20:8 (April 24, 2001): 63.Google Scholar
  29. Interrogate the Internet. (1996). “Contradictions in Cyberspace: Collective Response.” In Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies, ed. Rob Shields. London: Sage, pp. 125–132.Google Scholar
  30. Jameson, Fredric. (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kellner, Douglas. (2000). “Multiple Literacies and Critical Pedagogies: New Paradigms.” In Revolutionary Pedagogies: Cultural Politics, Instituting Education, and the Discourse of Theory, ed. Peter Pericles Trifonas. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 196–202.Google Scholar
  32. Kelly, Ursula. (1997). Schooling Desire: Literacy, Cultural Politics and Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Kress, Guenther. (2000). “Design and Transformation: New Theories of Meaning.” In Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, ed. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis. Literacies. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 153–161.Google Scholar
  34. Luke, Carmen. (2000). “Cyber-Schooling and Technological Change: Multiliteracies for New Times.” In Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, ed. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis. Literacies. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 69–91.Google Scholar
  35. Luke, Robert. (2001). “Dial In, Sell Out.” Shift (Available on-line:, pp. 28–29.
  36. —. “habit@online:web portals as purchasing ideology.” Topia (in press).Google Scholar
  37. —. “Signal Event Context: Trace Technologies of the habit@online.” Educational Philosophy and Theory (in press).Google Scholar
  38. Mazlish, Bruce. (1994). “The Flaneur: From Spectator to Representation.” In The Flâneur, ed. Keith Tester. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
  39. Menser, Michael and Stanley Aronowitz. (1996). “On Cultural Studies, Science and Technology.” In Technoscience and Cyherculture, ed. Stanley Aronowitz et al. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 7–28.Google Scholar
  40. Microsoft Passport. “Microsoft Passport.” Microsoft Corporation. <>.
  41. Microsoft. “MSN Canada.” Microsoft Corporation. <>.
  42. —. “Welcome to MSN.Com.” Microsoft Corporation. <>.
  43. Miedema, Siebren and Willem L. Wardekker. (1999). “Emergent Identity Versus Consistent Identity: Possibilities for a Postmodern Repoliticization of Critical Pedagogy.” In Critical Theories in Education: Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics, ed. Thomas S. Popkewitz and Lynn Fendler. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 67–83.Google Scholar
  44. Morgan, Robert. (2000). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  45. My Netscape. “My Netscape.” Netscape. <>.
  46. My Yahoo! “Welcome to My Yahoo!” Yahoo! Inc. <>.
  47. “My-Id.Com.” <> 2001.
  48. Myerson, George. (2001). Heidegger, Habermas and the Mobile Phone. Reading, UK: Icon Books (UK); Totem Books (US).Google Scholar
  49. myTO. “MyTO.Com—Part of the Telus Network.” Telus. <>.
  50. Netscape. “Netscape.Com.” Netscape. <>.
  51. Peters, Thomas A. (1999). Computerized Monitoring and Online Privacy. Jefferson, North Carolina and London: McFarland and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  52. Rheingold, Howard. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  53. Samarajiva, Rohan. (1998). “Interactivity As Though Privacy Mattered.” In Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, ed. Phil E. Agre and Marc Rotenberg. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press, pp. 277–310.Google Scholar
  54. Shields, Rob. (1994). “Fancy Footwork: Walter Benjamin’s Notes on Flânerie.” In The Flâneur, ed. Keith Tester. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
  55. Stratton, Jon. (1996). “Cyberspace and the Globalization of Culture.” In Internet Culture, ed. David Porter. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
  56. Sunstein, Cass. (2001). Republic.Com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. The New London Group. (2000). “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures.” In Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, ed. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis. Literacies. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 9–38.Google Scholar
  58. Traffick. “Traffick — The PORTAL Portal.” <>.
  59. Trifonas, Peter. “Derrida and Rousseau: Deconstructing the Ethics of a Pedagogy of the Supplement.” The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies 22:3 (2000): 243–265.Google Scholar
  60. Wark, McKenzie. (1994). Virtual Geography: Living with Global Media Events. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Willis, Paul. (1990). Common Culture: Symbolic Work at Play in the Everyday Cultures of the Young. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wise, J. MacGregor. (1997). Exploring Technology and Social Space. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  63. —. “Intelligent Agency.” Cultural Studies 12:3 (1998): 410–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. —. “Home: Territory and Identity.” Cultural Studies 14:2 (2000): 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. World Wide Web Consortium. “Character Entity References in HTML 4.” World Wide Web Consortium. <>.
  66. Yahoo. “Yahoo!” Yahoo! Inc. <>.

Copyright information

© Peter Pericles Trifonas 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Luke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations