Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Culture and Religion in International Relations ((CRIR))

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

Several domestic phenomena and issues that juxtapose with religion are becoming progressively global in that they are no longer bound by state borders. We qualify them as transnational. Religious fundamentalism is becoming an increasingly important factor in both domestic and international politics in most parts of the world and across religions with political Islam being, perhaps, the most obvious but clearly not the only example of this. Religiously motivated terrorism has an increasingly global agenda. International missionary movements often upset local governments and cultures. Human rights, including religious human rights, has become a global issue. Also many transnational issues like women’s rights and family planning have religious aspects or overtones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This information is also taken from The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2000 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2000 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002). Andrea Morigi, Vittorio Emanuele, Vernole Chiara Verna, “Report 2000 on Religious Freedom in the World” Aid to the Church in Need, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2000 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. It must be noted that the Kuwaiti government only officially recognizes three Churches: The Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, and the National Evangelical Church of Kuwait (Protestant). These Churches enjoy “full recognition” and are permitted to build temples and worship publicly. The other, unrecognized, churches are permitted private worship in private homes, Office of the Secretary of State, 1999 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, Report on Human Rights Practices, 1999 (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2000), “Lebanon: Thinking the Holy Unthinkable” The Economist, March 28, 1998, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The U S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2001); Andrea Morigi, Vittorio Emanuele, Vernole Chiara Verna, “Report 2000 on Religious Freedom in the World” Aid to the Church in Need, 2000; “Qatar,” Religious Freedom World Report, www.religiousfreedom.com.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 1999 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2000); Andrea Morigi, Vittorio Emanuele, Vernole Chiara Verna, “Report 2000 on Religious Freedom in the World” Aid to the Church in Need, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy Human Rights, and Labor, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, Report on Human Rights Practices, 2001 (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002); Andrea Morigi, Vittorio Emanuele, Vernole Chiara Verna, “Report 2000 on Religious Freedom in the World” Aid to the Church in Need, 2000; “UAE,” Religious Freedom World Report, www.religiousfreedom.com.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2000 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  17. U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, Report on Human Rights Practices, 1992 (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. The U.S. Office of the Secretary of State, 2001 Annual Report on International Religious Freedom (Washington, DC: U.S. Secretary of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fox, J., Sandler, S. (2004). Transnational Religious Phenomena. In: Bringing Religion into International Relations. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981127_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics