Making Space for Transnational Democracy
Our survey of transnational social movements in this volume suggests the state system is losing its place of privilege. We are witnessing the dislocation of traditional politics and the reordering of global affairs. As new forms of globally networked civil and (uncivil) actors emerge, the interstate system and hegemonic structures of world order are being disrupted, dislocated, and increasingly, sidestepped. The rise of global civil society is giving way to new identities, ties and dialogues that lay outside the reach and control of states. The actors of global civil society are also pressuring global governance institutions to become more transparent and engage them directly. Indeed, much of the real implementation of the work of global institutions—as in peacemaking, de-mining, environmental monitoring, development, emergency humanitarian assistance—depends on NGO and social movement capacities to work the ground in local settings around the world, to network, and report back.
KeywordsEurope Cage Hunt Arena Argentina
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Appadurai, Arjun, ed. 2001. Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Bowden, Charles. 2003. “Outback Nightmares and Refugee Dreams.” Mother Jones (March/April): 47–5 5.Google Scholar
- Chandhoke, Neera. 2002. “The Limits of Global Civil Society.” Pp. 35–53 in Global Civil Society 2002, ed. Mary Glasius, Mary Kaldor, and Helmut Anheier. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Curl, Joseph. 2004. “Foreign Observers to Audit Election.” Washington Times, August 7.Google Scholar
- Der Derian, James. 2000. Virtual War. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
- Ebo, Bosah. 2001. Cyberimperialism: Global Relations in the New Electronic Frontier. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Eschle, Catherine. 2001. Global Democracy, Social Movements and Feminism. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
- Gill, Stephen. 2003. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Glasius, Marlies and Mary Kaldor. 2002. “The State of Global Civil Society Before and After September 11.” Pp. 3–33 in Global Civil Society, ed. Marlies Glasius, Mary Kaldor, and Helmut Anheier. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kaldor, Mary. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink, 1998. Activists beyond Borders. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Leatherman, Janie. 2003. From Cold War to Democratic Peace: Third Parties, Peaceful Change and the OSCE. Syrause, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
- Magnussen, Warren. 1996. The Search for Political Space. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Mittelman, James H. 2002. “Making Globalization work for the Have Nots.” International Journal on World Peace 19, no. 2 (June): 3–25.Google Scholar
- Naughton, John. 2001. “Contested Space: the Internet and Global Civil Society.” Pp. 147–68 in Global Civil Society 2001, ed. Glasius, Marlies, Mary Kaldor, and Helmut Anheier. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
- Pigeaud, Fanny. 2003. “The Sengalese Chicken is Debated at the WTO.” La Liberation. Accessed October 19, 2004 <http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/080703I.shtml>.
- Rupert, Mark. 2000. Ideologies of Globalization. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Smith, Jackie, and Hank Johnston, eds. 2002. Globalization and Resistance. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Zur, Ofer. 2002. “Time for a Wall.” Tikkun 17, no. 3: 20–22.Google Scholar