Global Arrogance and the Crisis of Hegemony

  • Janie Leatherman


In an era of wealth and opportunity, a simple fact demands our attention; most of the world’s people lack basic human needs. Their daily struggle is a stark contrast to the privileged lives that a global minority take for granted. The chasm between these two worlds is growing. In his Nobel Peace Prize address, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter has called this “the most serious and universal problem,” a disparity that we can trace to “the root causes of most of the world’s unresolved problems, including starvation, illiteracy, environmental degradation, violent conflict, and unnecessary illnesses that range from guinea worm to HIV and AIDS.” Carter calls on us to share with others “an appreciable part of our excessive wealth,” but notes we seem to lack “understanding or concern about those who are enduring lives of despair and hopelessness” (2002, 3–4).


Social Movement World Trade Organization Global Governance Global Civil Society Democratic Deficit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aksu, Esref and Joseph A. Camilleri, eds. 2002. Democratizing Global Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Albright, Madeleine K. 2000. “Sustaining Democracy in the Twenty-First Century.” The Roots Lecture Series, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, D.C., January 18. As Released by the Office of the Spokesman U.S. Department of State.Google Scholar
  3. Anheir, Helmut and Nuno Themuod. 2002. “Organizational Forms of Global Civil Society: Implications of Going Global.” Pp. 191–215 in Global Civil Society, ed. Marlies Glasius, Mary Kaldor, and Helmut Anheier. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barfield, Claude E. 2001. Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy. The Future ofthe World Trade Organization. Washington, D.C.: The AEI Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barthes, Roland. 1994. Mythologies, trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang. 28th printing.Google Scholar
  6. Bayes, Jane H. and Nayereh Tohidi, ed. 2001. Globalization, Gender and Religion. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, Elizabeth. 2003. “Delegates From Poorer Nations Walk out of World Trade Talks.” The New York Times, September 15: A1, A4.Google Scholar
  8. Bienen, Derek, Volker Rittberger, and Wolfgang Wagner. 1998. “Democracy in the United Nations System: Cosmopolitan and Communitarian Principles.” Pp. 287–380 in Re-Imagining Political Community, ed. Daniel Archibuigi, David Held, and Martin Köhler, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boswell, Terry and Christopher Chase-Dunn. 2000. The Spiral of Capitalism and Socialism: Toward Global Democracy. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  10. Brilmayer, Lea. 1994. American Hegemony. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carter, Jimmy. 2002. Carter Nobel Peace Prize Speech. December 10. Transcript accessed September 15, 2004 <>.
  12. Chomsky, Noam. 1999. The New Military Humanism. Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar
  13. Council on Foreign Relations. 2002. Public Diplomacy: A Strategy for Reform. A Report of an Independent Task Force on Public Diplomacy Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, D.C. <>.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, Robert. 1996. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  16. Dunne, Michael. 2000. “U.S. Foreign Relations in the Twentieth Century: From World Power to Global Hegemony.” International Affairs 76, no.1: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edelman, Murray. 1992. “The Construction and Uses of Social Problems.” Pp. 263–80 in Jean Baudrillard: The Disappearance of Art and Politics, ed. William Stearns and William Chaloupka. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foot, Rosemary, S. Neil MacFarlane, and Michael Mastanduno. 2002. U.S. Hegemony and International Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, Michel. 1977. The Archeology of Knowledge, trans. from the French by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  20. Fukuyama, Francis. 2000. “The March of Equality.” Journal of Democracy 11, no.1: 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. —. 1998. “Women and the Evolution of World Politics.” Foreign Affairs 77 no.5: 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fulbright, J. William. 1966. The Arrogance of Power. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  23. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited by Q. Hoare and G. Smith. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Guidry, John A., Michael D. Kennedy, and Mayer N. Zald. 2000. Globalizations and Social Movements. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Held, David. 1998. “Democracy and Globalization.” Pp. 11–27 in Re-Imagining Political Community, ed. Daniel Archibuigi, David Held, and Martin Köhler. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hershberg, Eric and Kevin Moore. 2002. “Introduction: Place, Perspective and Power: Interpreting September 11.” Pp. 1–19 in Critical Views of September 11, ed. Eric Hershberg and Kevin Moore. Social Science Research Council <>.Google Scholar
  27. Hettne, Björn and Bertil Odén, eds. 2002. Global Governance in the 21st Century: Alternative Perspectives on World Order. Expert Group on Development Issues 2002:2. Stockholm, Sweden: Almkvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  28. Hooper, Charlotte. 2001. Manly States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Human Development Report 2001. Making New Technologies Work for Human Development. United Nations Development Programme <>.
  30. Johnson, Paul. 2002. “European Envy, American Arrogance?” Forbes 169, no.9: 37.Google Scholar
  31. Kagan, Robert. 1998. “The Benevolent Empire.” Foreign Policy (Summer): 24–35.Google Scholar
  32. Karns, Margaret P. and Karen A. Mingst. 2004. International Organizations: The Politics and Processes of Global Governance. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  33. Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kristof, Nicholas D. 2003. “Flirting with Disaster.” The New York Times February 14, p. A31.Google Scholar
  35. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. N.Y.: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Leatherman, Janie, Jackie Smith, and Ron Pagnucco. 1994. “International Institutions and Transnational Social Movement Organizations: Global Politics as a Three Level Game.” Paper presented at the SSRC-Kroc Institute joint sponsored workshop on: International Institutions and Transnational Social Movement Organizations. April 21–23.Google Scholar
  37. Linklater, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lipschutz, Ronnie. 2000. After Authority. Albany, N.Y.: University of New York.Google Scholar
  39. Mayall, James. 2000. “Democracy and International Society.” International Affairs 76, no.1: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maynes, Charles William. 1998. “The Perils of (and for) an Imperial America.” Foreign Policy 111: 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Michelini, Dennis. 2002. “Tracing Clues Along the Border.” The New York Times August 23, p. A17.Google Scholar
  42. Nandy, Ashis. 2002. “The Beautiful, Expanding Future of Poverty: Popular Economics as a Psychological Defense.” International Studies Review 4, no. 2: 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Naples, Nancy A. and Manisha Desai, ed. 2002. Women’s Activism and Globalization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Nye, Joseph. 2004. “When Hard Power Undermines Soft Power.” New Perspectives Quarterly 21, no. 3: 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams. Contesting Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Patrick, Stewart. 2002. “More Power to You: Strategic Restraint, Democracy Promotion and American Primacy.” International Studies Review 4, no.1: 117–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. PIPA/Knowledge Networks Poll. 2003. Americans on America’s Role in the World after the Iraq War. Accessed at <>.
  48. Powell, Colin L. 2003. “Remarks at the World Economic Forum.” Davos, Switzerland, January 26. Accessed at <>.Google Scholar
  49. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rice, Condoleezza. 2000. “Promoting the National Interest.” Foreign Affairs 79, no. 1 ( January/February): 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Risse, Thomas, Stephen Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rubin, Trudy. 2001. “Arrogance of Global Power Is Worrisome.” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel April 29, accessed October 25, 2004 <>.
  53. Sassen, Saskia. 2002. “Governance Hotspots: Challenges We Must Confront in the Post September 11 World.” Social Science Research Council/After Sept. 11. Accessed at <>.Google Scholar
  54. Scholte, Jan Aart. 2000. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  55. Scott, Catherine. 2003. “Americans Aren’t Consumers who have to be sold on War.” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution January 22.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, Jackie, Charles Chatfield, and Ron Pagnucco, eds. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, Jackie and Johnston, eds. 2002. Globalization and Resistance. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  58. Sontag, Susan. 2002. “Real Battles and Empty Metaphors.” The New York Times, p. A31.Google Scholar
  59. Steans, Jill. 1998. Gender and International Relations. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  60. Tehranian, Majid. 2002. “Democratizing Governance.” Pp. 55–74 in Democratizing Global Governance, ed. Aksu, Esref and Joseph A. Camilleri. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  61. Tenet, George J. 2002. “Worldwide Threat—Converging Dangers in a Post 9/11 World.” Testimony of Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet before the Senate Armed Services Committee, March 19, 2002. Accessed at <>.Google Scholar
  62. Tickner, J. Ann. 2001. Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Urry, John. 2000. “Global Flows and Global Citizenship.” Pp. 62–78 in Citizenship and Identity, ed. Engin F. Isin and Patricia, Wood. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Vandenberg, Andrew, ed. 2000. Citizenship and Democracy in a Global Era. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  65. Weber, Cynthia. 2001. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. New York: Roudedge.Google Scholar
  66. Webber, Julie. 2003. Failure to Hold. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  67. We the Peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and Global Governance. 2004. Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations. A/58/817. Accessed at <>.

Copyright information

© Janie Leatherman and Julie Webber 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janie Leatherman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations