Slavery, Colonialism, and State Formation in the Sudan

  • Amir H. Idris


Neither culture nor race is at the heart of the current conflict in the Sudan. Rather it is the racialized state that transformed cultural identities into political identities through the practice of slavery in the precolonial period, indirect rule during the colonial period, and state exclusive policy of citizenship in the postcolonial period. The goal here is to examine how these political and racial identities have been constructed through the process of state formation.


State Formation Slave Trade Colonial State Indirect Rule African Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 22.
    Cited in T.D. Murray and A.S. White (1895) Sir Samuel Baker: A Memoir, London: Macmillan, p. 138.Google Scholar
  2. 43.
    See Charles L. (1918) Native Races and Their Rulers, Cape Town, Argus Printing, p. 30.Google Scholar
  3. 46.
    See E.E. Evans-Pritchard (1938) Administrative Problems in the Southern Sudan, Oxford: Oxford University Summer School on Colonial Administration, p. 77.Google Scholar
  4. 53.
    See Robert Collins (1964) “Autocracy and Democracy in the Southern Sudan: The Rise and Fall of the Chiefs’ Court,” in A. Rivkin, ed., Nations by Design, New York: Anchor Book.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Amir H. Idris 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir H. Idris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations