Service-Learning as Postmodern Pedagogy

  • Dan W. Butin

Abstract

Stanley Fish has done it again. He has thoroughly antagonized liberals with his outrageous statements and at the same time frustrated conservatives intent on appropriating his rhetoric (though conservatives don’t usually get the irony; but more on that later).

Keywords

Bromide Marketing Stake Blindness Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Billig, S. & Welch, M. (2004). New perspectives in service-learning: Research to advance the field. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bringle, Robert & Julie Hatcher (1995). A Service-learning curriculum for faculty. The Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 2: 112–122.Google Scholar
  3. Butin, D. W. (2003a). Of what use is it? Multiple conceptualizations of service-learning in education. Teachers College Record, 105(9): 1674–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butin, D. W. (2003b). The limits of categorization: Re-reading multicultural education. Educational Studies, 34 (1): 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butin, D. W. (2005). Identity (re)construction and student resistance. In D. W. Butin (Ed.), Teaching social foundations of education: Contexts, theories, and issues (pp. 109–126). Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Campus Compact (2004). Presidents’ declaration on the civic responsibility of higher education. Available at http://www.compact.org/presidential/declaration.html. Accessed 10/27/04.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eyler, Janet & Dwight E. Giles, Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Fish, S. E. (1967). Surprised by sin: The reader in paradise lost. New York: Macmillan; St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fish, S. E. (1972). Self-consuming artifacts: The experience of seventeenth-century literature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fish, S. E. (1980). Iv there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fish, S. E. (1994). There’s no such thing as free speech, and it’s agood thing, too. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fish, S. E. (1999). The trouble with principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fish, S. E. (2001). How Milton works. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fish, S. E. (2003). Aim low. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49 (36): C5.Google Scholar
  16. Fish, S. E. (2004a). Why we built the ivory tower. New Tbrk Times, 5/21/04, A23.Google Scholar
  17. Fish, S. E. (2004b). “Intellectual diversity”: The Trojan horse of a dark design. Chronicle of Higher Education 50(23): B13—B14.Google Scholar
  18. Fish, S. E. & Veeser, H. A. (1999). The Stanley Fish reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Furco, Andrew (1996). Expanding Boundaries: Serving and Learning. Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.Google Scholar
  20. Furco, Andrew & Shelley Billig (Eds.) (2002). Service-learning: The essence of the pedagogy. Greenwich, CT: IAP Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gutmann, A. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Habermas, J. (1989). jûrgen Habermas on society and politics: A reader. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Horowitz, D. & Lehrer, E. (n.d.). Political bias in the administrations and faculties of 32 elite colleges and universities. Available at http://www.studentsforacademicfreedom.org/reports/lackdiversity.html. Accessed October 28, 2004.
  24. Kendall, Jane (Ed.) (1990). Combining service and learning: A resource book for community and public service. Raleigh, NC: National Society for Internships and Experiential Education.Google Scholar
  25. Lisman, C. David (1998). Toward a civil society: Civic literacy and service-learning. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  26. Liu, Goodwin (1995). Knowledge, foundations, and discourse: Philosophical support for service-learning. The Michigan journal of Community Service-Learning, 2: 5–18.Google Scholar
  27. Michigan Journal of Community Service-learning (MJCSL) (2001). Service-learning course design workbook. Jeffrey Howard (Ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: OCSL Press.Google Scholar
  28. Morton, Keith. (1995). The irony of service: Charity, project, and social change in service-learning. The Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 2: 19–32.Google Scholar
  29. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sigmon, Robert (1979). Service-learning. Three principles. ACTION, 8 (1): 9–11.Google Scholar
  31. Stanton, T., Giles, D., & Cruz, N. I. (1999). Service-learning: A movement’s pioneers reflect on its origins, practice, and future (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Varlotta, Lori E. (1997). A critique of service-learning’s definitions, continuums, and paradigms: A move towards a discourse-praxis community. Educational Foundations, Summer: 53–85.Google Scholar
  33. Wittgenstein, L. (2000). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Zlotkowski, Edward (1995). Does service-learning have a future? The Michigan journal of Community Service-Learning, 2: 123–133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dan W. Butin 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan W. Butin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations