“I Can Never Turn My Back on That”: Liminality and the Impact of Class on Service-Learning Experience

  • Sue Ellen Henry

Abstract

Service-learning is often framed as a pedagogical perspective and instructional tool that can help “privileged” students gain greater insight into the life experience and perspectives of “others,” namely those “served” in the service-learning arrangement. Central to this positive conception of service-learning is a binary between “privileged server” and “underprivileged recipient” or an “us/them” dichotomy. Recently, this dichotomy has been questioned by some researchers as problematic to a transformative understanding of service-learning (Flower 2002; Hourigan 1998; Novek 2000).

Keywords

Burning Income Neon Shoe Folk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amy (2004). Interview. Central Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  2. Aronowitz, S. (2003). How class works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blau, Peter & Otis Duncan (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Boyle-Baise, Marilynne & James, Kilbane (2000). What really happens? A look inside service-learning for multicultural teacher education. Michigan journal of Community Service Learning, 7: 54–64.Google Scholar
  5. Bureau, US Census (2004). Three-year-average median household income by state: 2000–2002. US Census Bureau 2002 [cited June 7, 2004 ].Google Scholar
  6. Bureau, US Census (2004). Press briefing on 2002 income and poverty estimates. US Census Bureau 2003 [cited June 7, 2004 ].Google Scholar
  7. Coleman, Richard & Lee Rainwater (1978). Social standing in the United States: New dimensions of class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. College, John Tyler Community (1995). John Tyler Community College Weekend College: The first semester.Google Scholar
  9. Duberman, Lucille (1976). Social inequality: Class and caste in America. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  10. Flower, L. (2002). Intercultural inquiry and the transformation of service. College English, 65 (2): 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, Ann. (2001). But you aren’t white: Racial perceptions and service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Fall: 18–26.Google Scholar
  12. Horvat, Erin & Anthony Antonio (1999). “Hey, those shoes are out of uniform”: African American girls in an elite high school and the importance of habitus. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 30(3): 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hourigan, Maureen (1998). Critical literacy in “White Ethnic” classrooms: When empowered writing reveals class. Paper read at College Composition and Communication, at Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  14. Jackman, M. & Jackman R. (1983). Class a n’arè ucss in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jacqueline (2004). Interview. Central Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, Susan. R. & Elisa S. Abes (2004). Enduring influences of service-learning on college students’ identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 45 (2): 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Katelyn (2004). Interview. Central Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  18. Kingston, Paul (2000). The classless society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lipset, Seymour and Reinhard Bendix (1959). Social mobility in industrial society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. McIntosh, Peggy (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women’s studies. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  21. Nieto, Sonia (1998). On becoming American: An exploratory essay. In A light in dark times: Maxine Greene and the unfinished conversation, ed. William C. Ayers & Joanne L. Miller. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Novek, Eleanor (2000). Tourists in the land of service-learning: Helping middle-class students move from curiousity to commitment. Paper read at National Communication Association, at Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  23. Ryan, Jack & Charles Sackrey (1996). Strangers in paradise. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  24. Terenzini, Patrick T. et al. (1996). First generation college students: Characteristics, experience, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zweig, Michael (2000). The working class majority: America’s best kept secret. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dan W. Butin 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sue Ellen Henry

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations