Advertisement

The Creation Society’s Remaking of the Shishôsetsu

  • Christopher T. Keaveney
Chapter
  • 29 Downloads
Part of the Comparative Perspectives on Modern Asia book series (CPMA)

Abstract

The transfer of a distinct genre from one national literature to another is a difficult one to measure with any degree of accuracy. Frequently, this difficulty is compounded by the nebulous and often contradictory nature of genre distinctions themselves. Genres, by their very nature, are in a constant state of flux, developing in response to the exigencies of the literary community in which they are produced.1 This is certainly true of the shishôsetsu, a form that was evolving at the very time that the Creation Society was exposed to it

Keywords

Chinese Literature Current Circumstance Chinese Writer Autobiographical Event Modern Chinese Literature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Anthony Pare and Graham Smart, “Observing Genres in Action: Toward a Research Methodology,” in Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway (London: Taylor and Francis, 1994), 153.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paul de Man, “Autobiography as Defacement,” in The Rhetoric of Romanticism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984), 226.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Irmela Hijiya-Kirschnereit, Rituals of Self Revelation: Shishôsetsu as Literary Genre and Socio-Cultural Phenomenon (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996), 162.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Guo Moruo, “Lun guonei de pingdan ji wo duiyu chuangzuo shang de taidu” (Concerning Domestic Critical Circles and My Attitude Toward Creativity) in Chuangzaoshe ziliao, vol. 1, Chen Huangmei, ed. (Fujian: Fujian renmin chubanshe, 1985), 15. Originally appeared in the August 4, 1922 edition of Shanghai’s Shishi Xinbao newspaper.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Stephen W. Kohl, “Shiga Naoya and the Literature of Experience,” Monumenta Nipponica 32: 2 (Summer 1977): 211.Google Scholar
  6. 13.
    Masao Miyoshi, “Against the Native Grain: The Japanese Novel and the ‘Postmodern West,’” South Atlantic Quarterly (Fall 1988): 537.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    Wayne C. Booth, The Rhetoric of Fiction, 2nd edition (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1983), 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 16.
    Henry Y.H. Zhao, The Uneasy Narrator: Chinese Fiction From the raditional to the Modern (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 60.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Ye Shengtao, “Wenyi tan,” in Modern Chinese Literary Thought: Writings on Literature, 1893–1945, ed. and trans. Kirk A. Denton (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1996), 164. Originally published serially from March 5 to June 25, 1921 in Chenbao.Google Scholar
  10. 25.
    Itô Toramaru, “Satô Haruo yu Yu Dafu,” Zhongguo xiandai wenxue yanjiu 2 (February 1993), 209.Google Scholar
  11. 30.
    Quoted in Yu Yun, Yu Dafu Chuan (Fuzhou: Fujian sheng renmin dasha, 1984), 54.Google Scholar
  12. 31.
    As quoted in James A. Fujii, Complicit Fictions: The Subject in the Modern Japanese Prose Narrative (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1993), 20. Originally appeared in Booth, The Rhetoric of Fiction, 151.Google Scholar
  13. 33.
    Yu Dafu’s “Wind Chime” (Fengling) originally appeared in Chuangzao Jikan 1:2 (1922). Reprinted in Chen Huangmei, ed., 1: 83–99.Google Scholar
  14. 34.
    Lydia H. Liu, “Narratives of Modern Selfhood: First-Person Fiction in May Fourth Literature,” in Politics, Ideology, and Literary Discourse in Modern China: Theoretical Interventions and Cultural Critique, ed. Liu Kang and Xiaobing Tang (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 39.
    Kasai Zenzô, “Kanashiki Chichi,” in Gendai bungaku taikei, vol. 29, ed. Takenauchi Shizuo (Tokyo: Chikuma Shobô, 1967), 265.Google Scholar
  16. 42.
    Anna Dolezelovâ, Yü Ta-fu: Specific Traits of His Literary Creation (London: C. Hurst and Company, 1971), 36.Google Scholar
  17. 53.
    Shiga Naoya, “At Kinosaki,” in Donald Keene, ed., Modern Japanese Literature: From 1868 to the Present Day, trans. Edward Seidensticker (New York: Grove Press, 1956), 274.Google Scholar
  18. 66.
    Guo Moruo, “Halfway,” Chen Huangmei, ed., Chuangzaoshe ziliao, 1: 13–32. Originally appeared in the Creation Quarterly 1: 3 (Fall 1922), 1–20.Google Scholar
  19. 72.
    Donald Keene, Dawn to the West: Japanese Literature in the Modern Era (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1984), 521.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Christopher T. Keaveney 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher T. Keaveney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations