Thinking Like a Policy Analyst

Policy Analysis as a Clinical Profession
  • Iris Geva-May


The main objective of this chapter is to highlight the intellectual processes involved in policy analysis. The chapter discusses (a) notions of professional reasoning; (b) clinical reasoning and cognitive processes in the clinical process of policy analysis; (c) theories of cognition and bounded rationality that contribute to policy analysis practice (i.e., problem solving, prediction and decision making); and (d) awareness of these issues and instructional implications for enabling a learner to successfully join the policy analysis professional community. The author proposes a pedagogy of learning through inference as it yields embodied concepts that can be reclaimed in future related diagnostic contexts.


policy analysis profession bounded rationality clinical cognition reasoning discipline medicine psychology economics practice instruction diagnosis uncertainty context cues embodied knowledge 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allard, F. 1993. Cognition, Expertise, and Motor Performance. In Cognitive Issues in Motor Expertise. J.L. Starkes and F. Allard, eds. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Amsterdam, A.G. 1984. Clinical legal education—A 21st-century perspective. Journal of Legal Education 34: 612–19.Google Scholar
  3. Bardach, E. 1976. Gathering data for policy research. Journal of Urban Analysis 1974 (2): 117–44.Google Scholar
  4. —. 2000. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. New York: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Barzelay, M. 2001. The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, H.S. 1978. Arts and crafts. American Journal of Sociology 83 (4): 862–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, J.O. 1985. Theory of Sets of Probabilities (and Related Models) in a Nutshell. In Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer, G.D. and P. deLeon. 1983. The Foundations of Policy Analysis. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J.S. 1963. The Process of Education. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Brunswick, E. 1943. Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review 50: 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, L.J. and J.P. Chapman. 1966. Genesis of popular but erroneous psycho-diagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 72(3): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clement, J. 1988. Imagery in problem solving in physics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Cognition in Science Learning, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
  13. Conslisk, J. 1996. Why bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature 34(2): 669–700.Google Scholar
  14. Czerlinski, J., G. Gigerenzer and D.G. Goldstein. 1999. How Good Are Simple Heuristics? In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd and the ABC Research Group, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. 1933. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relationship of Reflective Thinking to Educative Process. Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
  16. —. 1938. Logic and the Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Dunn, W.N. 1981. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Edwards, W 1954. The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin 51: 380–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elmore, R.F. 1985. Forward and Backward Mapping: Reversable Logic. In Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary Systems. K. Hanf and T.A.J. Toonen, eds. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Elstein, A.S. 2000. Clinical problem solving and decision psychology: Comment on the epistemology of clinical reasoning. Academic Medicine 7510: 134–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elstein, A.S. and A. Schwarz. 2002. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: Selective review of the cognitive literature. British Medical Journal 324: 729–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ericsson, K.A. and W. Kintsch. 1995. Long-term working memory. Psychology Review 102: 211–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Etzioni, A. 1985. Making policy for complex systems. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 4(3): 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer, Frank and John Forester, eds. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gagne, E.D. 1984. Psychology of Learning. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  26. Center, D. and A. Stevens. 1983. Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Geva-May, I. 2002. Comparative studies in public administration and public policy. Public Management Review 26: 3.Google Scholar
  28. Geva-May, I. and A. Maslove. 2000. What prompts health care policy change? On political power contests and treatment of health care systems: The case of Canada and Israel. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 25(4): 717–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geva-May, I. with A. Wildavsky. 1997 [2001]. An Operational Approach to Policy Analysis: The Craft. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gigerenzer, G. 1999. The Adaptive Toolbox. In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. G. Gigerenzer and R. Selten, eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gigerenzer, G. and R. Selten, eds. 1999. Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gigerenzer, G. and R Selten. 1999. Rethinking Rationality. In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. G. Gigerenzer and R Selten, eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Goldberg, L.R. 1968. Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments. American Psychologist 23(7): 483–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldstein, D.G., G. Gigerenzer, R.M. Hogarth, A. Kacelnik, Y. Kareev, G. Klein, L. Martignon, J.W. Payne and K.H. Schlag. 1999. Group Report: When do Heuristics Work? In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. G. Gigerenzer and R Selten, eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Grefher, D. 1992. Testing Bayes’ rule and the representativeness heuristic: some experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization. 17(1): 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grether, D. and C. Plaott. 1979. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review 69(4): 623–38.Google Scholar
  37. Hammond, K.R. 1996. Human Judgment and Social Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hennessey, S. 1993. Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship. Studies in Science Education 22: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Herrenstein, R. and D. Prelec. 1991. Melioration: A theory of distributed choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(3): 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoppe, R. and I. Geva-May, eds. 2002. Cultural theory and its contribution to policy analysis. Special Issue. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 4:3.Google Scholar
  41. Ingram, H. 1990. Implementation: A Review and Suggested Framework. In Public Administration: The State of the Art. N.B. Lynn and A. Wildavsky, eds. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  42. Kahneman, D., J. Knetsch and R. Thaler. 1991. Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1): 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kassirer, J.P. and R.I. Kopelman. 1991. Learning Clinical Reasoning. Baltimore, MA: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  45. Lerner, D. and H.D. Lasswell, eds. 1951. The Policy Sciences. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lewin, K. 1938. The Conceptual Representations and the Measurement of Psychological Forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Loewenstein, G. and R.H. Thaler. 1989. Intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lynn, L.E. 1996. Public Management as Art, Science, and Profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  49. —. 1999. Teaching and Learning with Cases. New York: Chatham House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mach, E. 1983. The Science of Mechanics. 9th ed. Trans. Thomas McCormack. London: Open Court.Google Scholar
  51. MacRae, D. and J. Wilde. 1979. Policy Analysis for Public Decisions. California: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  52. Majone, G. n.d. Craftmanship. In The Uses of Policy Analysis. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  53. —. 1975. On the notion of political feasibility. European Journal of Political Research 3: 259–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. —. 1977. Pitfalls of analysis and analysis of pitfalls. Journal of Urban Analysis 4: 232–51.Google Scholar
  55. —. 1989. An Anatomy of Pitfalls. In Pitfalls of Analysis. G. Majone and S. Quade, eds. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  56. Majone, G. and S. Quade, eds. 1989. Pitfalls of Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  57. May, P. 1986. Politics and policy analysis. Political Science Quarterly 101(1): 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. —. 1989. Hints for crafting alternative policies. Policy Analysis 7(2): 227–44.Google Scholar
  59. Meltsner, A. 1972. Political feasibility and policy analysis. Public Administration Review 32: 859–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. —. 1976. Policy Analysis in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mintrom, M. 2003. People Skills for Policy Analysts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Newell, A. and H.A. Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  63. Nisbett, R and L. Ross. 1980. Human Interferences: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Norman, G.R. 2000. The epistemology of clinical reasoning: Perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience. Academic Medicine 75(10): 127–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Norman, G.R. and H.G. Schmidt. 1992. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine 67: 557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Patton, C.V. and D.S. Sawicki. 1993. Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  67. Payne, J.W., J.R. Bettman and E.J. Johnson. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Piaget, J. 1953. Logic and Psychology. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  69. —. 1977. The Development of Thought. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  70. —. 1985. The Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rabin, M. 1998. Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 11–46.Google Scholar
  72. Radin, B.A. 2000. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Reiner, M. 1998. Thought experiments and collaborative learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education 20: 1043–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. —. 2000. Thought Experiments and Embodied Cognition. In Developing Models in Science Education. J.K. Gilbert and C.J. Boulter, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Reiner, M. and J. Gilbert. 2000. Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education 22(5): 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Riker, W.H. 1983. Political Theory and the Art of Heresthetics. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Ada Finifter, ed. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  77. —. 1984. The heresthetics of constitution-making: The Presidency in 1787, with on determinism and rational choice. American Political Science Preview 78: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. —. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  79. —. 1990. Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model. In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting. J.M. Enelow and M.J. Hinich, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Sargent, T.J. 1993. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Sauermann, H. and R Selten. 1962. Anpassungstheorie der Unternehmung. Zges. Staatswiss 118: 577–97.Google Scholar
  82. Scott, J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes To Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Selten, R 1999. What is Bounded Rationality? In Bounded Rationality. The Adaptive Toolbox. G. Gigerenzer and R Selten, eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  84. Simon, H.A. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review 63: 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stigler, G.J. 1961. The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy 69: 213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stokey, E. and R. Zeckhouser. 1978. A Primer for Policy Analysis. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  87. Todd, P.M. 1999. Fast and Frugal Heuristics and Environmentally Bounded Minds. In Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. G. Gigerenzer and R. Selten, eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  88. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. —. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tversky, A. and R Thaler. 1990. Anomalies: Preference reversals. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(2): 201–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Webber, D.J. 1986. Analyzing political feasibility: Politics’ unique contribution to policy analysis. Policy Studies Journal 14(4): 545–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Weick, Karl. 2001. Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  93. Weimer, D.L. 1992. The craft of policy design: Can it be more than art? Policy Studies Review 11(3/4): 370–87.Google Scholar
  94. —. 1993. The current state of the design craft: Borrowing, tinkering, and problem solving. Public Administration Review 53(2): 110–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weimer, D.L. and A.R. Vining. 1989 [2000]. Policy Analysis Concepts and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  96. —. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Hampshire: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  97. Wildavsky, A.B. 1987. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Bown & Co.Google Scholar
  98. Williams, W 1998. Elonest Numbers and Democracy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iris Geva-May 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iris Geva-May

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations