Marriage and Amor

  • Tracy Adams
Part of the Studies in Arthurian and Courtly Cultures book series (SACC)

Abstract

The romance, a cocktail of realistic and fantastic detail, transmutes the historical, permitting events to be reclaimed in a new register. The romance thus controls the meaning of the history it processes, and it is therefore a valuable tool for promulgating ideologies. In the words of Geraldine Heng:

[R]omance represents a medium that is neither wholly fantastical nor wholly historical, but in which history and fantasy collide, the one vanishing into the other, almost without a trace, at the location where the advantage of both can most easily be mined. For romance does not repress or evade the historical—as has sometimes been claimed—but surfaces the historical, which it transforms and safely memorializes in an advantageous form, as fantasy…. Negotiating thus history and fantasy to special advantage, the genre of romance offers the skillful manipulator an ideological medium of incomparable value.1

In opposition to strong currents of rhetoric that denied the value of the body, the romance elaborates its characters through their amorous activities. Sexual desire was an issue upon which the Church and the aristocracy agreed in a fundamental way: it was not an emotion upon which to found a marriage.

Keywords

Dust Hunt Ghost Volatility Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Geraldine Heng, Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy (NewYork: Columbia University Press, 2003), p. 45.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.R. Curtius, European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973), p. 124.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anne Llewellyn Barstow, Married Priests and the Reforming Papacy: The Eleventh-Century Debates (New York: The Edwin Mellon Press, 1982), p. 175.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Neil Cartlidge, Medieval Marriage: Literary Approaches, 1100–1300 (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1997), p. 15.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    See Christopher N.L. Brooke, The Medieval Idea of Marriage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 79.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Nancy Partner, Serious Entertainments: The Writing of History in Twelfth-Century England (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1977), p. 47.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    C.N.L. Brooke, “Gregorian Reform in Action: Clerical Marriage in England, 1050–1200,” Cambridge Historical Journal 12 (1956): 1.Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    R.W. Southern, Western Society and the Church in the Middle Ages (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970), p. 126.Google Scholar
  9. 22.
    Dyan Elliott, Spiritual Marriage: Sexual Abstinence in Medieval Wedlock (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 141.Google Scholar
  10. 28.
    R.J. Helmholz, Marriage and Litigation in Medieval England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974), p. 25.Google Scholar
  11. 30.
    John W. Baldwin, The Government of Philip Augustus: Foundations of French Royal Power in the Middle Ages (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1986), pp. 267–268.Google Scholar
  12. 48.
    Gerald A. Bond, The Loving Subject: Desire, Eloquence, and Power in Romanesque France (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995), p. 100.Google Scholar
  13. 51.
    Sarah Kay, Courtly Contradictions: The Emergence of the Literary Object in the Twelfth Century (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001), p. 2.Google Scholar
  14. 64.
    Peter Damian, Letters, trans. Owen J. Blum, O.F.M. (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1997), p. 14.Google Scholar
  15. 67.
    Jody Enders, The Medieval Theatre of Cruelty: Rhetoric, Memory, Violence (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), p. 161.Google Scholar
  16. 70.
    Robert Glendinning, “Pyramus and Thisbe in the Medieval Classroom,” Speculum 61 (1986): 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 72.
    C. Stephen Jaeger, The Envy of Angels: Cathedral Schools and Social Ideals in Medieval Europe, 950–1200 (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994), p. 105.Google Scholar
  18. 80.
    Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley (New York: Vintage Books, 1978), p. 34.Google Scholar
  19. 95.
    Peter Dronke, “Peter of Blois and Poetry at the Court of Henry II,” Mediaeval Studies 38 (1976): 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tracy Adams 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tracy Adams

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations