The Problem of Love

  • Tracy Adams
Part of the Studies in Arthurian and Courtly Cultures book series (SACC)

Abstract

In The Knight, the Lady and the Priest, Georges Duby characterizes Lambert of Ardres, a cleric who chronicled the chivalrous and amorous adventures of his patrons in his History of the Counts of Guines, as a debunker of the popular literary conventions of courtly love. Although familiar with the romances of courtly love, in his account of the broken betrothal of Arnoul II of Guines in 1188 to the older, wealthier Ide, Countess of Boulogne, Lambert sets love “right in the middle of concrete reality.” Duby explains:

Ide had loved Arnoul, or at least “out of feminine frivolity and deceit” she had pretended to. Arnoul, for his part, had loved Ide, or at least “out of masculine prudence and cunning” had acted the part. In fact, “he aspired, by winning the countess’s favors through that genuine or simulated love, to the lands and dignity attached to the comté of Boulogne.”1

“[A]s we see quite clearly here,” Duby concludes,“amorous posturings were only the prelude to nuptial ceremonies, and beneath such displays were hidden the stern realities of dynastic politics.” For Lambert, courtly love is a duplicitous discourse that Arnoul had assimilated through reading courtly romances and then assumed to disguise his ulterior motives “out of masculine prudence and cunning”—or at least this is how Duby understands Lambert’s take on the matter. In another chapter of the same work Duby reinforces his notion of courtly love as deception, writing that contemporary sermons castigated noble youths, who, steeped in the literature of courtly love, pretended to “abase themselves before women, simulating mutual love and scandalously playing at serving ladies as they ought to serve only their lord .”2

Keywords

Clay Coherence Assure Posit Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 11.
    Rosalind C. Morris, “All Made Up: Performance Theory and the New Anthropology of Sex and Gender,” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1995): 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 20.
    C.S. Lewis, The Allegory of Love (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936), p. 2.Google Scholar
  3. 21.
    Jean Frappier, “Structure et sens du Tristan: version commune, version courtoise,” Cahiers de Civilisation Médiévale 6 (1963): 255–280; 441–454. My translation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 23.
    Theresa Tinkle, Medieval Venuses and Cupids: Sexuality, Hermeneutics and English Poetry (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996), p. 10.Google Scholar
  5. 24.
    Karl Uitti, “Remarks on Old French Narrative: Courtly Love and Poetic Form (I),” review article Romance Philology 26 (1972–1973):80–81.Google Scholar
  6. 25.
    E. Jane Burns, “Speculum of the Courtly Lady: Women, Love, and Clothes,” The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 29 (1999): 253.Google Scholar
  7. 29.
    Maureen Fries, “Female Heroes, Heroines, and Counter-Heroes: Images of Women in Arthurian Tradition,” Arthurian Women: A Casebook, intro. and ed. Thelma S. Fenster (New York and London: Garland, 1996), p. 63.Google Scholar
  8. 38.
    See Michael R. McVaugh, ed., Opera Arnaldi omnia III: Tractatus de amore heroico. Epistola de dosi tyriacalium medicinarum (Barcelona: University of Barcelona, 1985), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
  9. 39.
    Kathryn Gravdal, “Poetics of Rape Law in Medieval France,” Rape and Representation, ed. Lynn A. Higgins and Brenda R. Silver (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 207–226.Google Scholar
  10. 42.
    Ordericus Vitalis, The Ecclesiastical History of Ordericus Vitalis, ed. and tran. Marjorie Chibnall, 6 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969),vol. 2, pp. 290–291.Google Scholar
  11. 44.
    Jean Devisse, Hincmar: Archevêque de Reims 845–882, 3 vols. (Geneva: Droz, 1975), vol. 1, p. 375. My translation.Google Scholar
  12. 45.
    Diane Wolfthal, “ ‘A Hue and Cry’: Medieval Rape Imagery and Its Transformation,” Art Bulletin 75 (1993): 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 47.
    Henriette Benveniste, “Les Enlèvements: stratégies matrimoniales, discours juridique et discours politique en France à la fin du Moyen Age,” Revue Historique 283 (1990): 21. My translation.Google Scholar
  14. 49.
    Cited in Alison Weir, Eleanor of Aquitaine: By the Wrath of God, Queen of England (London: J. Cape, 1999), p. 92.Google Scholar
  15. 50.
    Peggy Reaves Sanday, “Rape-Free versus Rape-prone,” Evolution, Gender, and Rape, ed. Cheryl Brown Travis (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003), pp. 337–361.Google Scholar
  16. 54.
    M.-D. Chenu, “L’Homme et la nature: perspectives sur la Renaissance du XIIe siècle,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 19 (1953): 57. My translation.Google Scholar
  17. 82.
    Joan Cadden, “Medieval Scientific and Medical Views of Sexuality: Questions of Propriety,” Medievalia et Humanistica 14 (1986): 159.Google Scholar
  18. 84.
    Margaret R. Miles, “The Body and Human Values in Augustine of Hippo,” Grace, Politics and Desire: Essays on Augustine, ed. H. A. Meynell (Calgary, Alberta: University of Calgary Press, 1990), p. 61.Google Scholar
  19. 90.
    Richard W. Kaeuper, Chivalry and Violence in Medieval Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 19.Google Scholar
  20. 93.
    John F. Benton,“The Court of Champagne as a Literary Center,” Speculum 36 (1961), p. 590.Google Scholar
  21. 100.
    Alastair Minnis, Magister Amoris: The Roman de la Rose and Vernacular Hermeneutics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tracy Adams 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tracy Adams

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations