Work or Fight! pp 119-152 | Cite as

California: “Please Forward Chinese, Japanese and American Indians, but no Negroes”

  • Gerald E. Shenk

Abstract

Less than a month after draft boards had begun inducting men in the fall of 1917, the Adjutant General of California, J. J. Borree, instructed all draft boards in the State: “You are authorized to forward Chinese, Japanese and American Indians, but no Negroes, with the third contingent.”1 Governor William Stephens and his adjutant general thereby acquiesced to the insistence of federal authorities that there were only two races in the United States—“white” and “colored.” In this binary racial system only persons of African descent were “colored,” and anyone else would be classified as “white” for purposes of the Selective Service System and the racially segregated armed forces. This surely came as a surprise to Californians who, since 1854, had lived with a state Supreme Court decision that ruled just the opposite. In People v. Hall, the court agreed that there were two races in California—white and nonwhite—but that for purposes of the law, Chinese, other Asians, and American Indians, who it found were obviously not white, should be placed in the same racial category as “Negroes.” A string of federal court decisions, including several notable U.S. Supreme Court rulings, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century had generally confirmed this view. Immigrants from China, Japan, the Philippines, and India all faced an impenetrable barrier to U.S. citizenship because federal courts declared them not “white.”2 California, and eight other states, had barred such immigrants from owning land on the grounds that their nonwhite legal status disqualified them from becoming citizens.3 In so doing, these states explicitly defined whiteness as a narrowly restricted social and political status. In particular, they confirmed that whiteness involved special privileges with respect to land.

Keywords

Sugar Corn Europe Amid Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Ian F. Haney Lopez, White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race (New York: New York University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Gary Okihiro, Common Ground: Reimagining American History (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2001), 76.Google Scholar
  3. 20.
    Castillo as quoted in James J. Rawls and Walton Bean, California: An Interpretive History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003), 19.Google Scholar
  4. 21.
    Robert E Heizer and Alan E. Almquist, The Other Californians: Prejudice and Discrimination under Spain, Mexico, and the United States to 1920 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), 2–3.Google Scholar
  5. 46.
    James Wilson, The Earth Shall Weep: A History of Native America (New York: Grove Press, 1998), 300, 311–316;Google Scholar
  6. Peter Nabokov, Native American Testimony (New York: Penguin Books, 1999), 215–218;Google Scholar
  7. Ward Churchill, Perversions of Justice: Indigenous Peoples and Angloamerican Law (San Francisco: City Lights, 2003), 13.Google Scholar
  8. 59.
    Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of the Census, Thirteenth Census of the United States: Taken in the Year 1910, Vol. II, Population (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1913), 157, 174.Google Scholar
  9. 68.
    Walter G. Beach, Oriental Crime in California. A Study of Offenses Committed by Orientals in that State, 1900–1927 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1932), 459–460.Google Scholar
  10. 74.
    Tomas Almaguer, Racial Faultlines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994);Google Scholar
  11. Martha Menchaca, The Mexican Outsiders: A Community History of Marginalization and Discrimination in California (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1995);Google Scholar
  12. Neil Foley, White Scourge: Mexicans, Blacks, and Poor Whites in Texas Cotton Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997, 1999).Google Scholar
  13. 78.
    Provost Marshal General, Second Report of the Provost Marshal General on the Operations of the Selective Service System, to December 1918 (GPO: Washington, D.C., 1918), 458–459.Google Scholar
  14. 80.
    Nancy Ordover, American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003), 15–20.Google Scholar
  15. 90.
    Carey McWilliams, Factories in the Fields: The Story of Migratory Farm Labor in California (Little, Brown, & Company: Boston, 1939).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gerald E. Shenk 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald E. Shenk

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations