Advertisement

Nineteenth-Century German Community

  • Ricardo K. S. Mak

Abstract

Anthony Smith suggests that an “ethnic group” is a group of people who have a collective proper noun, a myth of common ancestry, collective historical memories, one or more differentiating elements of common culture, an association with a “homeland,” and a sense of solidarity among significant sectors of its population. 1 According to historical experience, it seems to be a rule that political entities consist of different ethnic groups. Different ethnic groups in a nation or a larger community do not always coexist peacefully, because they are inevitably caught in the struggle for social, economic, and political resources. Those who are bigger in size, more coherent, and politically or militarily better organized usually prevail over the others. War, invasion, and changes in the political boundaries continue to produce privileged as well as underprivileged ethnic groups. Peoples subdued by foreign invaders are likely to be politically, economically, and culturally marginalized. Ethnic groups possessing immense wealth and social resources such as the Chinese in twentieth-century Southeast Asian countries, though small in size, can play a key role in the domestic affairs of the host-state.

Keywords

German State German Government German Firm Colonial Government German Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

This chapter is a revised version of an article, “The German Community in 19th Century Hong Kong,” published in the Asia Europe Journal, vol. 2 (2004), pp. 237–55.

  1. 1.
    Anthony Smith, National Identity (Reno, Nev.: University of Nevada Press, 1991), p. 21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolfgang Bergem, “Culture, Identity and Distinction: Ethnic Minorities between Scylla and Charybdis,” in Stefan Wolff, ed., German Minorities in Europe: Ethnic Identity and Cultural Belonging (New York: Berghahn, 2000), p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Ernst Baasch, Beiträge zur Geschichte des Deutschen Seeschiffbaues und der Schiffbaupolitik (Hamburg: Lucas Gräfe & Sillen, 1898), p. 10.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Robert B. Asprey, Frederick the Great: The Magnificent Enigma (New York: Ticknor & Fields, 1986), pp. 572–73.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    Thomas Brysch, Marinepolitik im Preuischen Abgeordnetenhaus und Deutschen Reichstag 1850–1888 (Hamburg: Verlag E.S. Mittler, 1996), pp. 41–43.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    According to Philippe Dollinger, The German Hansa, trans. and ed. D. S. Ault and S. H. Steinberg (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970), the cooperation between Belgian, Dutch, English, and German traders in the North Sea can be dated back to the twelfth century. London, Antwerp, Brugge, and Amsterdam were all founding members of the early Hanseatic organization. See especially pp. 85–92.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    Karin Bartsch, Hamburgs Handelsbeziehung mit China und Britisch- Ostindien (Ph.D. diss., University of Hamburg, 1958), p. 22.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    For statistics of German ships visiting the above cities in the midnineteenth century, see Bernd Eberstein, Hamburg-China (Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde, 1988), p. 388.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    Percy Ernst Schramm, ed., Kaufleute zu Haus und Übersee: Hamburgische Zeugnisse des 17., 18. &19. Jh. (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag, 1948), p. 333.Google Scholar
  10. 20.
    Theodor Bohner, Von Dresden nach China: Der Deutsche Kaufmann von Carlowitz (Leipzig: Otto Elsner Verlagsgesellschaft, 1945), p. 10.Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    C. Melchers & Co., Bremen. Melchers & Co. Hongkong, Kanton, Schanghai, Hankow, Tientsin, Chinkiang, Ichang, Tsingtau (Bremen: n.p., 1909), pp. 11, 17–18.Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    Maria Möring, Siemssen & Co., 1846–1971 (Hamburg: Verlag Hanseatischer Merkur, 1971), pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    Herman Schlyter, Karl Gützlaff als Missionar in China (Lund: Gleerup, 1946), p. 33.Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    Wong Man Kong, Christian Missions, Chinese Culture, and Colonial Administration: A Study of the Activities of James Legge and Ernest John Eitel in Nineteenth Century Hong Kong (Ph.D. diss., Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1996), pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  15. 27.
    Briefe Richards von Carlowitz aus Ostindien und China von 1844 an, p. 32, Archives of Commerzbibliothek Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  16. 29.
    Solomon Matthews Bard, Traders of Hong Kong: Some Foreign Merchant Houses, 1841–1899 (Hong Kong: Urban Council, 1993), pp. 98–99.Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    Carl Smith, “The German Speaking Community in Hong Kong, 1846–1918,” Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. 34 (1994), p. 3.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    Adolf von Hänisch, Jebsen & Co. Hong Kong: China-Handel im Wechsel der Zeiten 1895–1945 (Apenrade: Selbstverlag, 1970), p. 33.Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    Harold James, A German Identity: 1770 to the Present Day (London: Phoenix, 1994), pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  20. 39.
    Frank H. H. King, Catherine E. King, and David J. S. King, eds., The Hongkong Bank in Late Imperial China 1864–1902 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p. 135.Google Scholar
  21. 44.
    Germany in Hong Kong: 50 Years Consulate General of the Federal Republic of Germany, 40 Years Goethe-Institut Hong Kong, 20 Years German Chamber of Commerce (Hong Kong: German Chamber of Commerce, Goethe-Institut, Consulate General of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2003), p. 3.Google Scholar
  22. 47.
    For a short discussion of the German missionaries in Hong Kong, see R. G. Tiedemann, “The Early German Protestant Missions in the Hong Kong Region,” paper presented at the international conference on “Church History of Hong Kong,” University of Hong Kong, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. 48.
    Schlyter, Karl Gützlaff als Missionar in China, pp. 68–77.Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    Timothy M. K. Wong (Wong Man Kong), “The Limits of Ambiguity in German Identity in Nineteenth Century Hong Kong: With Special Reference to Ernest Eitel (1838–1908),” in Ricardo K. S. Mak and Danny S. L. Paau, eds., Sino-German Relations Since 1800: Multidisciplinary Explorations (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2000), p. 84.Google Scholar
  25. 52.
    Wong, Christian Missions, Chinese Culture, and Colonial Administration, pp. 217–27.Google Scholar
  26. 53.
    For a short discussion of Wilhelm Lobscheid’s contribution to education in early Hong Kong, see Ng Lun Ngai-ha, Interactions of East and West: Development of Public Education in Early Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1984), pp. 26–31. Wilhelm Lobscheid’s observation of Hong Kong education in the nineteenth century was summed up in his A Few Notices on the Extent of Chinese Education and the Government Schools of Hong Kong (Hong Kong: China Mail Office, 1859).Google Scholar
  27. 56.
    Material from the name lists of directors given in The Board of Directors 1970–1971, ed., One Hundred Years of the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals 1870–1970 (Hong Kong: Tung Wah Group of Hospitals, 1971), pp. 62–64.Google Scholar
  28. 58.
    For instance in Hao Yen Ping’s brilliant study, The Comprador in Nineteenth Century China: Bridge between East and West (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970), the compradores working under Germans are briefly mentioned twice.Google Scholar
  29. 61.
    Colonial Office Records, Series CO 129, no. 169, pp. 263–70, Public Records Office, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  30. 62.
    Carlowitz & Co. Hamburg, Hong Kong, New York, China and Japan (Hamburg: n.p., 1906), p. 30.Google Scholar
  31. 63.
    Colonial Office Records, Series CO 129, no. 166, pp. 196–211, Public Records Office, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  32. 69.
    Smith, “The German Speaking Community in Hong Kong, 1846–1918,” pp. 9–10; Hänisch, Jebsen & Co. Hong Kong, pp. 33 and 444–45.Google Scholar
  33. 70.
    Winfried Speitkamp, “The Germans in Hong Kong, 1860–1914: Social Life, Political Interests, and National Identity,” in Mak and Paau, eds., Sino-German Relations Since 1800, p. 61.Google Scholar
  34. 71.
    Rogers Brubaker, Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992), pp. 116–18.Google Scholar
  35. 72.
    Helmuth Stoecker, Deutschland und China im 19. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Rütten & Loening, 1958), p. 73.Google Scholar
  36. 73.
    Udo Ratenhof, Die Chinapolitik des Deutschen Reiches 1871 bis 1945: Wirtschaft-Rüstung-Militär (Boppard am Rhein: Boldt, 1987), pp. 100–01.Google Scholar
  37. 79.
    According to Eberstein, the number of steamers from Hamburg to China increased from 16 in 1871 to 100 in 1913. More significantly, in 1862 Hamburg ships unloaded 1,351 cargoes in Chinese harbors, but in 1895 the weight of cargoes from Hamburg increased to 55,000 tons. See his Hamburg-China, p. 160.Google Scholar
  38. 82.
    Lothar Gall, ed., The Deutsche Bank (London: Trafalgar Square Publishing, 1985), p. 55.Google Scholar
  39. 83.
    Maximilian Muller-Jabusch, Fünfzig Jahre Deutsch-Asiatische Bank, 1890–1939 (Berlin: Deutsch-Asiatischen Bank, 1940), p. 11.Google Scholar
  40. 85.
    Dieter Glade, Bremen und der Ferne Osten (Bremen: Carl Schünemann Verlag, 1966), p. 114.Google Scholar
  41. 86.
    Max von Brandt, Dreiunddreissig Jahre in Ostasien: Erinnerungen eines deutschen Diplomaten (Leipzig: Verlag von Georg Wigano, 1901), vol. 1, p. 287.Google Scholar
  42. 89.
    Bert Becker, “The ‘German Factor’ in the Founding of the University of Hong Kong,” in Chan Lau Kit-ching and Peter Cunich, eds., An Impossible Dream: Hong Kong University from Foundation to Re-establishment 1910–1950 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 23–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cindy Yik-yi Chu 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo K. S. Mak

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations