Advertisement

Early Beginnings of British Community (1841–1898)

  • Gillian Bickley

Abstract

According to British chroniclers and historians, it was news of the preliminaries of a Sino-British treaty that led to the originally unofficial British settlement of Hong Kong Island, which took place in 1841; and subsequently, in 1843, the island was declared a British colony. Seventeen years later, by the Beijing Convention (1860), the territory administered by Britain was expanded, when Kowloon Peninsula (with Stonecutters Island) was also ceded to Britain on the same terms. But a further and final expansion, in 1898, when the New Territories and numerous islands were added, was for a limited period only. This final addition of territory was for a period of ninety-nine years: the New Territories were leased by Britain from China, beginning on July 1, 1898. Paradoxically, it was this lease—designed, by providing a buffer of territory, to preserve the British administration in the face of threat from expansionist European Powers in the region—which ultimately led to the close of British administration at midnight, June 30, 1997, when Britain ceremonially handed Hong Kong back to the government in mainland China.

Keywords

Chinese Mainland Early Beginning Armed Service British Citizen British Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Both this chapter and the following one have been assisted, as all of the author’s work in this area, by her husband, Verner Bickley, whose ready memory and useful suggestions have helped to make the best use of their joint resources of energy, information, and time.

  1. 1.
    G. B. Endacott, A History of Hong Kong, first published 1958, reissued in Oxford in Asia paperbacks (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1964, second edn., 1973), p. 18.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frank Welsh, A History of Hong Kong (London: HarperCollins Publishers, 1993), p. 108.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Speech (delivered June 25, 1850, HANSARD CXII [third ser.], pp. 380–444) added to <www.victorianweb.org/history/polspeech/foreign.html> by Marjie Bloy Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow, National University of Singapore from, Joseph Hendershot Park, British Prime Ministers of the Nineteenth Century: Policies and Speeches (New York: New York University Press, 1916).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    See Gillian Bickley, ed., Hong Kong Invaded! A ’97 Nightmare (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    See e.g., Gillian Bickley, The Golden Needle: The Biography of Frederick Stewart (1836–1889) (Hong Kong: David C. Lam Institute for East-West Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, 1997), p. 239.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    See e.g., Joyce Stevens Smith, Matilda: Her Life and Legacy (Hong Kong: Matilda and War Memorial Hospital, 1988), passim.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    Bickley, “Reverend Ernst Johann Eitel,” in Gillian Bickley, ed., The Development of Education in Hong Kong 1841–1897: As Revealed by the Early Education Reports of the Hong Kong Government 1848–1896 (Hong Kong: Proverse Hong Kong, 2002), pp. 199–204 (with notes, pp. 509–14), p. 200 & n. 38.Google Scholar
  8. 19.
    Endacott, A History of Hong Kong (p. 169) refers also to the vote for a statue of Sir Arthur Kennedy to be erected in the Botanical Gardens.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    Henry James Lethbridge, “Introduction,” in Albert Smith, ed., To China and Back: Being a Diary Kept Out and Home (1859; reprint, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1974), pp. vii–xiv.Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    For one comment on this, see Welsh, A History of Hong Kong, p. 136.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    Gillian Bickley and Verner Bickley, “Living and Working in Early Hong Kong,” talk given at the Jewish Community Centre, Hong Kong, November 12, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 25.
    Verner Bickley, Searching for Frederick and Adventures along the Way (Hong Kong: Asia 2000, 2001), pp. 144–48.Google Scholar
  13. 26.
    See e.g., Endacott, A History of Hong Kong, pp. 165–67.Google Scholar
  14. 30.
    Colin N. Crisswell, The Taipans: Hong Kong’s Merchant Princes (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 6.Google Scholar
  15. 33.
    See e.g., Gillian Bickley, “Reverend Professor James Legge,” in Bickley, ed., The Development of Education in Hong Kong 1841–1897, pp. 57–64. See also Lauren F. Pfister, Striving for “The Whole Duty of Man”: James Legge and the Scottish Protestant Encounter with China: Assessing Confluences in Scottish Nonconformism, Chinese Missionary Scholarship, Victorian Sinology, and Chinese Protestantism (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2004), vol. 2, p. 86.Google Scholar
  16. 34.
    Gillian Bickley, “The Right Reverend George Smith,” in Bickley, ed., The Development of Education in Hong Kong 1841–1897, pp. 25–31.Google Scholar
  17. 35.
    Education Department, Hong Kong, “Report on Education for the Year 1890” (May 30, 1891), in Bickley, ed., The Development of Education in Hong Kong 1841–1897, p. 341, para. 7.Google Scholar
  18. 36.
    See e.g., Bickley, The Golden Needle; The Development of Education in Hong Kong 1841–1897, and many other articles, chapters, and mimeographs, listed particularly in the bibliography of the latter. The same author’s The Stewarts of Bourtreebush (Aberdeen, Scotland: Centre for Scottish Studies, University of Aberdeen, 2003) includes documentation of the Scottish upbringing and education of Stewart.Google Scholar
  19. 38.
    Gillian Bickley, “Nineteenth Century NETs,” talk to NESTA (Native English Speaking Teachers’ Association), Gillian Bickley Collection, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  20. 39.
    “The Corporation Act of 1661 excluded from membership of town corporations all those who were not prepared to take the sacrament according to the rites of the Church of England. The Test Act passed in 1673 imposed the same test upon holders of civil or military office. Roman Catholics, Protestant Dissenters and followers of the Jewish faith were therefore excluded from public office. Religious groups including Unitarians, Wesleyan Methodists, Primitive Methodists, and the Society of Friends campaigned for a change in the law. In 1828 both the Corporation and Test Acts were repealed by Parliament. Roman Catholics were prevented from holding public office until the passing of the Catholic Emancipation Act of 1829. Jewish emancipation took longer and was not fully achieved until 1890” <www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Ltest.htm>.Google Scholar
  21. 41.
    The Macau Governor’s name was confirmed by Eric Sautede, Chief Editor, Chinese Cross Currents, Macau Ricci Institute, Macau. (The name given by Endacott, A History of Hong Kong, in both main text and index, is “Coelho Do Amaral.”)Google Scholar
  22. 47.
    See “Ecclesiastical Return,” Hong Kong Government Blue Book relating to 1847. Public Records Office, Hong Kong. (Also available as Colonial Office Records, Series CO 133, The National Archives, formerly known as Public Record Office, Kew, U.K.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cindy Yik-yi Chu 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gillian Bickley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations