Abstract
In this volume of essays on differing models of imperialism, different scholars engage in comparative studies of empires and imperial ideologies across various nations with British imperialism—and, to a limited extent, French imperialism—as the central point of reference. The main issue is the variety of dominance. To what extent is it true that imperialisms compete with each other? We all examine varieties of imperialism based on individual components in each case. The editors and authors of this volume argue that imperialisms fashion themselves in relation to their forms of nationhood, in relation to other imperialisms from which they discriminate themselves, and in relation to territories for which they compete. While it can be argued that the subvariety of British imperialism was distinguished by its prolonged and complex involvement with India, German imperialist discourse emerged in the Romantic era as a philosophical and scholarly discourse that is also sufficiently distinctive and cohesive to be taken into account. Susanne Zantop argued in a pioneering study of German precolonial fantasies that precolonial German letters from 1770 to 1870 saw the emergence of stories of sexual conquest and surrender, love and blissful domestic relations between colonizer and colonized, set in colonial territory, stories that made the strange familiar, and the familiar ‘familial.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Susanne Zantop, Colonial Fantasies: Conquest, Family, and Nation in Precolonial Germany, 1770–1870 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997), 2.
Sara Friedrichsmeyer, Sara Lennox, and Susanne Zantop, eds., The Imperialist Imagination: German Colonialism and Its Legacy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998 ), 8.
See Edward W. Said, Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1978), 19.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, The Philosophy of History , trans. J. Sibree (New York: Dover, 1956), 104.
Russell A. Berman, “German Colonialism: Another Sonderweg” European Studies Journal 16 (1999): 30.
Russell A. Berman, Enlightenment or Empire: Colonial Discourse in German Culture (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1998), 10.
John K. Noyes, The Mastery of Submission: Inventions of Masochism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997), 30.
A. J. Loveridge, British Colonial Experience in Educational Development: A Survey of Non-Formal Education for Rural and Agricultural Development (Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press, 1978), 15.
Gauri Viswanathan, “Milton and Education,” in Milton and the Imperial Vision , ed. Balachandra Rajan and Elizabeth Sauer (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1999), 289.
Ibid., 87; for a similar argument regarding the situation in Nigeria see Chuka E. Okonkwo, “The Language Medium of the School and the Curriculum: The Case of Colonial Nigeria,” Journal ofAfrican Studies 9, 4 (1982–3): 194–200.
Stephen H. Roberts, History of French Colonial Policy (1870–1925) (London: P. S. King & Son, LTD, 1929), 636.
See Sibylle Benninghoff-Liihl, Deutsche Kolonialromane 18841914 in ihrem Entstehungs- und Wirkungszusammenhang (Bremen: Ubersee-Museum, 1983), 16–52 for an overview of some of these activities to promote colonial education of the German population.
Werner Schiefel, Bernhard Dernburg: 1865–1937, Kolonialpolitiker und Bankier im wilhelminischen Deutschland (Zurich: Atlantis, 1974), 60.
Direktor Fabarius, Der deutsche Kulturpionier.• Nachrichten aus der deutschen Kolonialschule (Witzenhausen: Eigenverlag, 1900), 5.
J. A. Onnen, “Die kolonialen Bildungsstatten Deutschlands,” Deutsche Kolonial-Zeitung 50.1 (1938): 50.
Direktor Fabarius, “Aufgabe und Arbeit der Deutschen Kolonialschule nach dem ‘Vertrage’ von Versaille,” Koloniale Rundschau 15.1 (1925): 13.
Daniel Walther, “Creating Germans Abroad: White Education in German Southwest Africa, 1894–1914,” German Studies Review 24 (2001): 325.
Hermann von Wif3mann, “Zur Behandlung des Negers,” Das Deutsche Kolonialbuch , ed. Hans Zache (Berlin: Wilhelm Andermann, 1925), 39.
Hans Zache, “Deutschlands koloniale Eingeborenenpolitik,” Das Deutsche Kolonialbuch (Berlin: Wilhelm Andermann, 1925), 69.
Hauptmann Leue, “Unsere Eingeborenen,” Koloniale Monatsblatter 9 (1913): 363.
See Hans Meyer, Das deutsche Kolonialreich: Eine Länderkunde der deutschen Schutzgebiete , 2 vols. (Leipzig, Vienna: Bibliographisches Institut, 1910).
See Missionar H. Vedder, “Eingeborenenerziehung im heutigen Sudwest-Afrika,” Koloniale Rundschau 15. 6 (1925): 183.
Marcia Wright, “Local Roots of Policy in German East Africa ,” Journal ofAfrican History 9. 4 (1968): 625.
Pfarrer E. Dinkelacker, “Bilder aus der Mittelschule in Bonaberi,” Jambo watu! Das Kolonialbuch der Deutschen , ed. Willy Bolsinger and Hans Rauschnabel (Stuttgart: Steffen, 1927), 46.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2004 Imperialisms
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilke, S. (2004). The Colonial Pedagogy of Imperial Germany: Self-Denial in the Interest of the Nation. In: Rajan, B., Sauer, E. (eds) Imperialisms. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980465_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980465_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52878-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8046-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)