Abstract
Since 1949 the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has played an important function as balancer on the Korean peninsula. Particularly since the late 1980s, Beijing has served a key constructive role in reducing tensions and facilitating reconciliation between Seoul and Pyongyang. There are, however, limitations to China’s role in Korean conflict management linked to its policy preferences vis-à-vis the Korean peninsula and desired political outcomes on the peninsula. While Beijing’s enlightened self-interest has fueled its constructive involvement on the peninsula, self-interest and extreme aversion to rapid major change also constrain the extent of its contribution. Indeed, Chinese diplomacy tends to eschew bold transformational initiatives in preference for efforts that are far more conservative and aimed at maintaining the status quo. This tendency by Beijing toward excessive caution is even more in evidence as a leadership transition from the so-called third generation headed by Jiang Zemin to the fourth generation headed by Hu Jintao is underway. And China’s national interests vis-à-vis inter-Korean relations dictate a preference for what might be dubbed peninsular conflict management without swift resolution.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the U.S. government, Department of Defense, or U.S. Army.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Andrew Scobell, “Soldiers, Statesmen, Strategic Culture and China’s 1950 Intervention in Korea,” Journal of Contemporary China 8 (1999): 477–497.
Chae-Jin Lee, China and Korea: Dynamic Relations ( Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1996 ), pp. 121–122;
Samuel S. Kim, “The Making of China’s Korea Policy in the Era of Reform,” in Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Reform Era, ed. David M. Lampton ( Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001 ), p. 379.
Samuel S. Kim, “China, Japan, and Russia in Inter-Korean Relations,” Korea Briefing 2000–2001 ( Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2002 ).
Andrew Scobell, “North Korea on the Brink: Breakdown or Breakthrough?” in The Rise of China in Asia: Security Implications, ed. Carolyn Pumphrey (Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, 2002 ), p. 213.
Joseph S. Bermudez, Jr., The Armed Forces of North Korea (London and New York: I.B. Taurus, 2001 ), p. 103.
Kenneth W. Allen and Eric A. McVadon, China’s Foreign Military Relations Report No. 32 (Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1999 ), pp. 66–67.
Nicholas Eberstadt, “Korea,” in Strategic Asia: Power and Purpose, 2001–02, ed. Richard J. Ellings and Aaron L. Friedberg ( Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2001 ), p. 138.
Benjamin Neaderland, “Quandary on the Yalu: International Law, Politics, and China’s North Korean Refugee Crisis,” Stanford Journal of International Law 40: 1 (2004): 143–177.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Samuel S. Kim
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scobell, A. (2004). China and Inter-Korean Relations: Beijing as Balancer. In: Kim, S.S. (eds) Inter-Korean Relations: Problems and Prospects. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980434_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980434_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52832-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8043-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)