Skip to main content

The U.S. Role: Helpful or Harmful?

  • Chapter
Iran, Iraq, and the Legacies of War

Abstract

For the past 50 years, Iran and Iraq have been regarded and dealt with as elements in a wider U.S. agenda. A summary of the milestones in bilateral relations will serve to underline the ways ties with the United States influenced both parties and by extension their relations with each other. Some observations can then be made about how the United States has itself made a connection between Iraq and Iran and treated them as a pair—either by deliberately playing off one against the other, as during the Iran-Iraq War, or by lumping the two together under “dual containment” in the 1990s and on a so-called axis of evil depicted by President George W. Bush in January 2002. A year later, the U.S. intervention in Iraq was portrayed as the first step in a regional democratization strategy that would oblige Iran to change too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Bruce Robellet Kuniholm, The Origins of the Cold War in the Near East: Great Power Conflict and Diplomacy in Iran, Turkey, and Greece (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), pp. 410–31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See James A. Bill, The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988), p. 79 where he cites four reasons for the U.S. decision to intervene, namely preoccupation with the Soviet threat, oil interests, the success of British persuasion, and Mosaddeq’s negotiating techniques that eventually backfired.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charles Tripp, A History of Iraq (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 140–42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steven L. Spiegel, The Other Arab-Israeli Conflict: Making America’s Middle East Policy, from Truman to Reagan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), pp. 119–64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For discussion of the deliberations in Washington see: Hussein Sirriyeh, U.S. Policy in the Gulf 1968–1977: Aftermath of the British Withdrawal (London: Ithaca Press, 1984), chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gary Sick, All Fall Down: America’s Tragic Encounter with Iran (New York: Random House, 1985), pp. 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anthony H. Cordesman, The Gulf and the Search for Strategic Stability: Saudi Arabia, the Military Balance in the Gulf and Trends in the Arab-Israeli Military Balance (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1984), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sick, All Fall Down and Barry Rubin, Paved with Good Intentions: The American Experience and Iran (London: Penguin Books, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Apparently by connivance rather than just good fortune, as recounted by Gary Sick in October Surprise: America’s Hostages in Iran and the Election of Ronald Reagan (New York: Random House, 1991), especially pp. 145–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fred Halliday, The Making of the Second Cold War (Norfolk, UK: Thetford Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. For a discussion of the Soviet naval presence in the Indian Ocean and U.S. countermeasures see Alvin J. Cottrell and Michael L. Moodie, The United States and the Persian Gulf Past Mistakes, Present Needs, Agenda Paper No. 13 (Washington, D.C.: National Strategy Information Center, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. William B. Quandt, “The Gulf War: Policy Options and Regional Implications,” in American Arab Affairs, no. 9 (Summer 1984), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bruce W. Jentleson, With Friends Like These: Reagan, Bush and Saddam (New York: WW Norton, 1994), pp. 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anthony H. Cordesman, “The Gulf Crisis and Strategic Interests: a Military Analysis,” in American Arab Affairs, no. 9 (Summer 1984), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bill, The Eagle and the Lion, p. 306; Jentleson, With Friends Like These, p. 46; and Alan Friedman, Spider’s Web: Bush, Saddam, Thatcher and the Decade of Deceit (London: Faber and Faber, 1993), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Caspar Weinberger, Security Arrangements in the Gulf, Gulf Cooperation Council Reports Series, no. 3, 1988, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. George P. Shultz, Turmoil and Triumph: My Years as Secretary of State (Macmillan: New York, 1983), p. 790.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zachary Karabell, “Backfire: US Policy Toward Iraq, 1988–2 August 1990,” in Middle East Journal, vol. 49, no. 1 (Winter 1995), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For an assessment see Hossein Alikhani, Sanctioning Iran: Anatomy of a Failed Policy (London: I.B.Tauris, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gary Sick, “US policy in the Gulf: objectives and prospects,” in Managing New Developments in the Gulf ed. Rosemary Hollis (London: RIIA, 2000), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mike Allen and Karen DeYoung, “Bush Charts First-Strike Policy on Terror Cells,” International Herald Tribune, June 3, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Richard Perle, “Why the West must Strike First Against Saddam Hussein,” Daily Telegraph, August 9, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brian Knowlton, “War talk by Cheney is tougher,” International Herald Tribune, August 27, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. For analysis of the internal politics behind U.S. decision-making see Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard A. Clarke, Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror (New York: Free Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ali M. Ansari, Iran, Islam and Democracy: The Politics of Managing Change (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2000), chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Robert D. Kaplan, The Arabists: The Romance of an American Elite (New York: The Free Press, 1993), p. 263, and Jentleson, With Friends Like These, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Lawrence G. Potter Gary G. Sick

Copyright information

© 2004 Lawrence G. Potter and Gary G. Sick

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hollis, R. (2004). The U.S. Role: Helpful or Harmful?. In: Potter, L.G., Sick, G.G. (eds) Iran, Iraq, and the Legacies of War. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980427_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics