Advertisement

Prescribing the Decline of the State

  • Per A. Hammarlund
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought book series (PMHIT)

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the normative elements in the decline-of-thestate hypothesis. It provides a critical interpretation of what roles Cobden, Mitrany, and Ohmae ascribe to the state in domestic affairs, and relates their visions of how the state should be organized to contemporary ideological trends and fashions regarding the ideal role of national governments. The analysis focuses on the tensions between Cobden, Mitrany, and Ohmae’s rhetoric of state decline and their visions of what ought to be the proper roles of states. Their proposals for what governments should do in domestic affairs and the key roles they should occupy in national communities sit uneasily with their more exalted criticisms of the inherent flaws in state institutions, as well as their calls for retrenchment (Cobden), transcending the nation-state (Mitrany), and the end of the nation-state (Ohmae).

Keywords

Central Government Global Economy Government Spending Functional Approach International Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    George H. Sabine, A History ofPolitical Theory, third edition (London: George G. Harrap, 1951), p. 618.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldwin Smith, “The Manchester School,” The Contemporary Review (Vol. 67, March, 1895), p. 386.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edmund Burke, Thoughts and Details on Scarcity, 1795, in The Works of Edmund Burke, 1846, iv, p. 270. Quoted in E. H. Carr, What is History?, second edition (London: Penguin Books, 1990 [first published 1987]), p. 58.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unsigned, “The Church of Cobden,” The Pall Mall Gazette: An Evening Newspaper and Review, Wednesday, 10 January 1872, p. 121.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crane Brinton, English Political Thought in the 19th Century (New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks, 1962 [first published 1933]), p. 110.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Richard Cobden, House of Commons, 22 July 1864, in Richard Cobden, Speeches on Questions of Public Policy, Vol. I, of two volumes John Bright and James E. Thorold Rogers (eds.) (London: Macmillan and Co., 1870), p. 577.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Richard Cobden, House of Commons, 6 July 1848, in Richard Cobden, Speeches on Questions ofPublic Policy, Vol. II, of two volumes, John Bright and James E. Thorold Rogers (eds.) (London: Macmillan and Co., 1870), p. 474.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    J. A. Hobson, Richard Cobden: TheInternational Man (London: Ernest Benn, 1968 [first published 1919]), p. 391.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Richard Cobden, “Russia” (1836), in Richard Cobden, The Political Writings of RicharcZ Vol. I, of two volumes, fourth edition (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1903 [first published 1867]), pp. 138–9, emphasis in original.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Richard Cobden, “England, Ireland, and America” (1835), in Cobden, The Political Writings, Vol. I, p. 103.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    A. J. P. Taylor, The Trouble Makers: Dissent over Foreign Policy, 1792–1939 (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1957), p. 63.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Richard Cobden, letter to Joseph Sturge, 1846, in John Morley, The Life of Richard Cobden, fourteenth edition (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1920 [first published in two volumes 1879]), p. 501.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Cobden, Leeds, 18 December 1849, in Hirst, Free Trade and the Manchester School, p. 256.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
  15. 23.
    Richard Cobden, the Free Trade Hall, Manchester, 10 January 1849, in Hirst, Free Trade and the Manchester School, p. 304.Google Scholar
  16. 27.
    Richard Cobden, House of Commons, 22 May 1851, in Cobden, Speeches, Vol. II, p. 589. See also Hirst, Free Trade and the Manchester School, p. 482.Google Scholar
  17. 28.
    Cobden, House of Commons, 22 May 1851, in Cobden, Speeches, Vol II, p. 593. See also Hirst, Free Trade and the Manchester School, p. 486.Google Scholar
  18. 29.
    Richard Cobden, letter to Robertson Gladstone, president of the Financial Reform Association, 18 December 1848, in Hirst, Free Trade and the Manchester School, p. 397.Google Scholar
  19. 30.
    Richard Cobden, letter to George Combe, 29 December 1845, in Morley, The Life ofRichard Cobden, pp. 207–8, emphases in original. See also Wendy Hinde, Richard Cobden: A Victorian Outsider (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987), p. 123.Google Scholar
  20. 32.
    Robert D. Kaplan, “The Faceless Enemy,” The New York Times Book Review, 14 October 2001, p. 11.Google Scholar
  21. 33.
    Anthony Howe, Free Trade and Liberal England, 1846–1946 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 296.Google Scholar
  22. 34.
    See, e.g., J. D. B. Miller, “Norman Angell and Rationality in International Relations,” Peter Wilson, “Leonard Woolf and International Government,” David Long, “J.A. Hobson and Economic Internationalism,” and D. J. Markwell,“J.M. Keynes, Idealism, and the Economic Bases of Peace,” all in David Long and Peter Wilson (eds.), Thinkers ofthe Twenty YearsCrisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  23. 35.
    E. H. Carr, The New Society (Boston, MA: Beacon 1’ress, 1957 [lirst published 1951]), p. 87.Google Scholar
  24. 36.
    A. J. R. Groom, “Functionalism and World Society,” in A. J. R. Groom and Paul Taylor (eds.), Functtonalism: Theory and Practice in International Relations (New York, NY: Crane, Russak & Company, 1975), p. 100.Google Scholar
  25. 37.
    See, e.g., David Mitrany, “The Political Consequences of Economic Planning,” The Sociological Review (Vol. 26, No. 4, 1934).Google Scholar
  26. 38.
    David Mitrany, The Progress ofInternational Government (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1933), pp. 140–1.Google Scholar
  27. 39.
    David Mitrany, speech on “Problems of World Citizenship and Good Group Relations,” in International Congress on Mental Health, London 1948: Proceedings ofthe International Conference on Mental Hygiene, 16th-21st August, Volume IV, (London: H.K. Lewis, 1948), p. 75.Google Scholar
  28. 40.
    Ibid., p. 78.Google Scholar
  29. 41.
    Ibid., pp. 77–8.Google Scholar
  30. 42.
    See, e.g., David Mitrany, “A Political Theory for the New Society,” in Groom and Taylor, Functionalism, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar
  31. 43.
    David Mitrany, “The Functional Approach in Historical Perspective,” InternationalAffairs (Vol. 47, No. 3, 1971), p. 543.Google Scholar
  32. 44.
  33. 45.
  34. 46.
    See, e.g., Paul Taylor, “Functionalism: The Theory of David Mitrany,” in Paul Taylor and A. J. R. Groom (eds.), International Organisation: A Conceptual Approach (London: Frances Pinter, 1978), p. 245.Google Scholar
  35. 47.
    David Mitrany, A WorkingPeace System (Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books, 1966), p. 164.Google Scholar
  36. 54.
    David Mitrany, “Parliamentary Democracy and Poll Democracy,” Parliamentary Affairs (Vol. 9, No. 1, 1955–56), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  37. 66.
    Linda Weiss, The Myth ofthe Powerless State: Governing the Economy in a Global Era (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998), p. 204.Google Scholar
  38. 67.
    Sven Steinmo, “The End of Redistribution? International Pressures and Domestic Tax Policy Choices,” Challenge! (Vol. 37, No. 6, 1994), pp. 9–17, in Weiss, The Myth ofthe Powerless State, p. 226.Google Scholar
  39. 68.
    Kenichi Ohmae, The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies (London: HarperCollins, 1995), pp. 42 and 68.Google Scholar
  40. 69.
    Ibid., p. 38.Google Scholar
  41. 70.
    Ibid., p. 123.Google Scholar
  42. 71.
    See, e.g., Kenichi Ohmae, The Invisible Continent: Four Strategic Imperatives of the New Economy (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2000), p. 231, and chapter 3, in this volume.Google Scholar
  43. 73.
    Susan Strange, The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 14.Google Scholar
  44. 75.
    See Kenichi Ohmae, The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace (London: HarperCollins, 1990), p. 172 and p. 11, respectively.Google Scholar
  45. 79.
    Kenichi Ohmae, The Mind of the Strategist: The Art of Japanese Business (NewYork, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1982), originally published in Japanese as Kigyo Sanbo, in 1975.Google Scholar
  46. 80.
    Kenichi Ohmae, Triad Power: The Coming Shape of Global Competition (NewYork, NY: The Free Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  47. 81.
    Kenichi Ohmae, Beyond National Borders: Reflections on Japan and the World (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1987); Kenichi Ohmae, in Ann Fact and Friction: Kenichi Ohmae on US-Japan Relations, Gregory and Sam Waite (eds.) (Tokyo: The Japan Times, 1990); and Ohmae, The Borderless World. Google Scholar
  48. 85.
    Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), pp. 154–60.Google Scholar
  49. 99.
    Kenichi Ohmae, “Putting Global Logic First,” Harvard Business Review (January-February, 1995), p. 125.Google Scholar
  50. 102.
    See also Kenichi Ohmae, “The Rise of the Region State,” Foreign A,ffairs (Vol. 72, No. 2, 1993), p. 78.Google Scholar
  51. 112.
    W. J. Fox, Royton, 12 February 1853, speech to Fox’s Oldham constituents, in Hirst, Free Trade and the Manchester School, p. 489.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Per A. Hammarlund 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per A. Hammarlund

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations