Knots and Tangles of International Obligation

  • Robert Jackson
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought Series book series (PMHIT)

Abstract

Realists claim that questions of obligation have little or no place in international relations, which they portray as a world of power politics: raison d’état, realpolitik. Diplomatic and commercial rela- tions between sovereign states, not to mention military encounters and acts of war or intervention, are instrumental activities calculated to advance or defend national interests. Issues of obligation—issues that demand or require acts of performance, observance, or compliance as a matter of duty or responsibility—are confined to states and do not extend across international borders. The state is the terminal political community: there is no community beyond the state. Political obligation is the duty to uphold and abide by the constitution, laws, and regulations of the state. It involves the most fundamental demands the state can lay upon its officials and citizens: allegiance to the constitution, obedience to the law, conscription, taxation, and education are among the most important.1 The notion of international obligation is a flight of the imagination. Worse than that, it is a misunderstanding and misrepresentation of international relations. Sovereign states are not in a position to demand or require acts of performance, observance, or compliance from each other as a matter of duty or responsibility. They cannot bind each other in the same obligatory way they can bind their officials and their citizens—when the state is effectively institutionalized.

Keywords

Europe Turkey Expense Arena Egypt 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    This pluralist feature of human conduct is explored with characteristic brilliance by I. Berlin, The Crooked Timber of Humanity (New York: Vintage Books, 1992).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    See the insightful investigation of the idea in J.R. Lucas, Responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 5.
    D.D. Raphael, Problems of Political Philosophy 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1990), ch. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    Aristotle, The Politics, rev. ed., tr. T.A. Sinclair (London: Penguin Classics, 1981).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    This is the core of a famous definition of sovereignty and law by J. Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 8.
    T. Hobbes, Leviathan (Oxford: Blackwell, 1946), ch. 13.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    For a general discussion with various points of view see S. Caney, D. George, and P. Jones (eds.), National Rights, International Obligations (Oxford: Westview, 1996).Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in H. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 102–05.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    These are usually listed as the primary sources or bases of international law. See M. Akehurst, A Modern Introduction to International Law 6th ed. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1987), ch. 3.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    See the critique of this conception by former U.S. senator D.P. Moynihan, On the Law of Nations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    See J.H. Jackson, “Helms-Burton, the U.S. and the WTO,” ASIL Insights (The American Society of International Law) (March 1997).Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    See D. Hendrickson, Peace Pact: The Lost World of the American Founding (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2003).Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    G. Schwarzenberger and E.D. Brown, A Manual of International Law (London: Professional Books, 1976), p. 551.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    See L. Gross, “The Criminality of Aggressive War,” The American Political Science Review, vol. 41 (April 1947), pp. 205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 22.
    See R. Tuck, The Rights of War and Peace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 115–18.Google Scholar
  16. 31.
    See L. Mulholland, Kant System of Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  17. 33.
    One of the best discussions is still J.L. Brierly, The Law of Nations, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936).Google Scholar
  18. 35.
    See K.T. Jackson, “International Jurisdiction,” in C. Gray, The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia (New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1999), vol. I, pp. 431–33.Google Scholar
  19. 36.
    See E.A. Posner, “Do States have a Moral Obligation to Obey International Law,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 55 (2003), pp. 1909–10.Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    Quoted in T. Strong, “History and Choices: The Foundations of the Political Thought of Raymond Aron,” History and Theory, vol. 11 (1972), p. 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 39.
    For an excellent discussion and critique see R. Stromberg, “The Idea of Collective Security,” Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 17 (April 1956), pp. 250–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 40.
    M. Wight, Power Politics, 2nd ed. (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979), pp. 217–18.Google Scholar
  23. 41.
    Martin Wight, International Theory: The Three Traditions (London: Leicester University Press for The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1991)Google Scholar
  24. and Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd ed. (London: Macmillan, 1995).Google Scholar
  25. 42.
    M. Donelan, Elements of International Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  26. 43.
    See, e.g. R. Fletcher, The Conversion of Europe: From Paganism to Christianity, 371–1386 A.D. (London: HarperCollins, 1997).Google Scholar
  27. 45.
    Quoted by J. Bowle, Western Political Thought: From the Origins to Rousseau (London: Methuen, 1961), p. 374.Google Scholar
  28. 47.
    See W. Bain, Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 48.
    See I. Hannaford, Race the History of an Idea in the West (Washington, D.C.: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  30. 49.
    D. Hay, Europe: The Emergence of an Idea (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  31. 50.
    See Ali Mazrui, Towards a Pax Africana (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar
  32. 51.
    See J. Jackson Preece, “Ethnic Cleansing as an Instrument of Nation-State Creation: Changing State Practices and Evolving Legal Norms,” Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 4 (1998), pp. 817–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 52.
    See J. Jackson Preece, National Minorities and the European Nation-States System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 54.
    Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1985).Google Scholar
  35. 55.
    I. Berlin, The Crooked Timber of Humanity (New York: Vintage Books, 1992), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar
  36. 56.
    See R. Jackson, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert Jackson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Jackson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations