Advertisement

Conversing with Thrasymachus: Voices of Realism

  • Robert Jackson
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought Series book series (PMHIT)

Abstract

Classical political thought, in one of its unmistakable modes of expression, is a dialogue, discourse, or conversation. Politics, too, is dialogical; it is “three-quarters talk.”1 In contemporary idiom, politics is an exchange—of thoughts, ideas, points-of-view, opinions, observations, judgments, communiqués, diplomatic notes, and so on—on issues of mutual interest or common concern. International politics, perhaps even more than other politics, lends itself to dialogue because of the horizontal character of international relations, particularly evident in diplomacy, which is characterized as a dialogue of states.2 One of the oldest dialogues in political science is a conversation between Socrates and Thrasymachus in Plato’s The Republic. Another is between the Athenians and the Melians in Thucydides’s History of the Peloponnesian War. These ancient discourses capture the persona of realism. This persona reappears, forcefully, in the writings of Machiavelli and Hobbes, from whom, along with Thucydides, modern realists derive their leading ideas. These ideas are not entirely instrumental. They disclose a normative discourse, but one that is reticent and fenced in.

Keywords

Foreign Policy International Relation Sovereign State Fair Play International Ethic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    M. Oakeshott, “The Political Vocabulary of the Modern European State,” Political Studies, vol. 23 (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Watson, Diplomacy: The Dialogue of States (London: Allen & Unwin, 1982).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Grube (tr.), Plato-Republic, rev. C. Reeve (Indianapolis, IN and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, 1992), Book I, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, rev. ed. tr. Rex Warner (New York: Penguin Books, 1972), pp. 400–08.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    N. Machiavelli, The Prince, tr. George Bull (London: Penguin Books, 1975).Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    President Woodrow Wilson, “Fourteen Points,” point I. Reprinted in L. Snyder (ed.), Historic Documents of World War I (New York: Van Nostrand Company, 1958), p. 164.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    G. Mattingly, “Machiavelli,” in J.H. Plumb (ed.), The Italian Renaissance (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), p. 191.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    N. Machiavelli, The Discourses (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970).Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    See E.F. Guarini, “Machiavelli and the crisis of the Italian republics,” in G. Bock, Q. Skinner, and M. Viroli (eds.), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 33.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    T. Hobbes, Leviathan ed. Michael Oakeshott (Oxford: Blackwell, 1946), ch. 13.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Thomas Hobbes, Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive) ed. B. Gert (Indianapolis, IN: Hacket, 1991), 258 (original emphasis).Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    See J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1944). This is the seminal work of game theory which expounds two-person zero sum games as well as cooperative and coalition games. The logic is instrumental and utilitarian, like modern economic analysis, with no consideration of ethics.Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    See J.R. Lucas, Responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Also see M. Weber on the ethic of responsibility in “Politics as a Vocation,” in H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford, 1958), pp. 120–28.Google Scholar
  16. 30.
    J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 46–48.Google Scholar
  17. 31.
    K. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979), p. 73.Google Scholar
  18. 37.
    Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Knopf, 1960).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert Jackson 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Jackson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations