Reconstructing the Balkans: A Global Governance Construct?

  • Rebecca J. Johnson

Abstract

Several of the essays in this book examine global governance at a very abstract level—as a discourse or a rhetorical move that influences thinking on legitimate social organization in its broadest terms (Späth, Friedrichs, Johns, and Patomäki). Analyses span the theoretical and empirical spectrum so that an examination of sixteenth-century Venice immediately precedes this selection, blending fluidly with the development of a future vision for political life. Perhaps it is their disconnection from the world as it exists today that gives these articles their critical distance and analytical power. This essay adopts a different approach. It scrutinizes the specific in an effort to gain leverage over the general. Its distance is psychological rather than temporal or spatial. The power of the critique launched here derives from the unease that is created when one is confronted with the reality that something is broken, that it cannot be fixed, and that although broken, it is still better than its counterparts in good repair.

Keywords

Europe Arena Defend Protec Reformer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashdown, Paddy. 2004. Office of the High Representative. Mission Implementation Plan. Sarajevo.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, Michael. 2001. Authority, Intervention, and the Outer Limits of International Relations Theory. In Internvention and Transnationalism in Africa: Global-Local Networks of Power, edited by T. Callaghy, R. Kassimir, and R. Latham, 47–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bukanovsky, Mlada. 2002. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Coordinator of the Stability Pact for Southeastern Europe. 2001. 2 1/2 Years of the Stability Pact: Lessons and Policy Recommendations. Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. European Stability Initiative. 2000a. Reshaping International Priorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Part II: International Power in Bosnia. Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. —. 2000b. Stability, Institutions, and European Integration. Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. —. 2001. In Search of Politics: The Evolving International Role in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. International Crisis Group. 2003. Bosnia’s Nationalist Governments: Paddy Ashdown and the Paradoxes of State Building. Europe Report No. 146. July 22, 2003. http://www.crisisgroup.org/library/documents/report_archive/A401057_22072003.pdf.Google Scholar
  9. Knaus, Gerald, and Felix Martin. 2003. Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovia: Travails of the European Raj. Journal of Democracy 14: 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korhonene, Outi. 2001. International Governance in Post-Conflict Situations. Leiden Journal of International Law 14: 495–529.Google Scholar
  11. Moore, Patrick. 2003. Mr. Holkeri Goes to Pristhina. RFE/RL Newline, July 25, 2003. www.hri.org/news/balkans/rferl/2003/03-08-01.rferl.html.Google Scholar
  12. Partner Marketing Consulting. 2003. Public Opinion Poll in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Banja Luka: Agency for International Development, November 2003.Google Scholar
  13. Schmidt, Hans Peter. 2001. When Networks Blind: Human Rights and Politics in Kenya. In Internvention and Transnationalism in Africa: Global-Local Networks of Power, edited by T. Callaghy, R. Kassimir, and R. Latham, 149–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo. 2004. Kosovo Standards Implementation Plan. Pristina.Google Scholar
  15. VanCreveld, Martin. 1999. The Rise and Decline of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Markus Lederer and Philipp S. Müller 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca J. Johnson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations