Advertisement

Shifting Political Identities and Global Governance of the Justified Use of Force

  • Anna Leander

Abstract

This is not a quote from a contemporary scholar discussing the impact of globalization on the way that the justified use of force is viewed. It is taken from Sheldon Wolin’s discussion of violence in Western political thought in the 1960s when the word globalization did not yet enjoy its current, seemingly irresistible, appeal. It nonetheless adequately describes a tension deepened since Wolin wrote his article: namely the tension between the inside/outside (state) boundaries that are used when thinking and reasoning about the justified use of force and the geographic boundaries and foreign commitments of society. This tension has increased as a result of two parallel developments in political identities. The first of these is the development of transnational political identities articulated in relation to issues that have boundaries different from those of the state. The interest of the community no longer coincides with the geographic boundaries of the state in Wolin’s wording. The second development is the parallel affirmation of the rights of individuals to resist oppressive states (and their use of force) that creates uncertainty about the foreign commitments of society to intervene in support of that right. These developments have opened up the questions that are the stuff of the global governance debate.

Keywords

Civil Society Global Governance Political Identity Geographic Boundary International Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angoustures, Aline, and Valérie Pascal. 1993. Diasporas et financement des conflits. In Économie des guerres civiles, edited by François Jean and Jean-Christophe Rufin, 495–543. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1969. On Violence. New York: A Harvest Book Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, Michael M. 2002. Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. —. 2001. Den explosive elændighed Information, September 15.Google Scholar
  6. Bayart, J. F., S. Ellis, and B. Hibou. 1997. La criminalisation de l’Etat en Afrique. Paris: Editions Complexe.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Ulrich G. 2000. What is Globalization? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Bilgin, Pinar, and Adam David Morton. 2002. Historicising Representations of “Failed States”: Beyond the Cold-War Annexation of the Social Sciences. Third World Quarterly 20 (1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buzan, Barry. 1995. The Security Problematique in the “New World Order.” In On Security, edited by R. D. Lipschutz, 196–211. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Rogue States: The Rule of Force in World Affairs. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clapham, Christopher. 1996. Africa and the International System. The Politics of State Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connolly, William. 1984a. The Dilemma of Legitimacy. In Legitimacy and the State, edited by W. Connolly, 222–249. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1984b. Legitimacy and Modernity. In Legitimacy and the State, edited by W. Connolly, 1–20. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. —. 1991. Identity/Difference. Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. —. 2000. Speed, Concentric Cultures and Cosmopolitanism. Political Theory 28 (5): 596–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elias, Norbert. 1982. Civilization and Violence: On the State Monopoly of Physical Violence and its Infringements. Telos 16: 133–154.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, Irving S. 1983. Private Bank Conditionality: Comparison with the IMF and the World Bank. In IMF Conditionality, edited by J. Williamson, 109–124. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  18. Frost, Mervyn. 1996. Ethics in International Relations. A Constitutive Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gambetta, Diego. 1993. The Sicilian Mafia: The Business of Private Protection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gellner, Ernest. 1959. Words and Things. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
  21. Giddens, Anthony. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Die postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  23. Hassner, Pierre. 1995. Par-delà le national et l’international: la dérision et l’espoir. In La violence et la paix. De la bombe atomique au nettoyage ethnique, 335–355. Paris: Editions Esprit.Google Scholar
  24. Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modem State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hobbes, Thomas. 1651 [1985]. Leviathan. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  26. Holsti, Kalevi J. 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howe, Herbert M. 2001. Ambiguous Order. Military Forces in African States. Boulder CO.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jean, François, and Jean-Christophe Rufin, eds. 1999. Économie des guerres civiles. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  30. Kaldor, Mary. 1999. Transnational Civil Society. In Human Rights in Global Politics, edited by T. Dunne and N. J. Wheeler, 195–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Citizenship in an Era of Globalization. In Politics in the Vernacular, edited by W. Kymlicka, 317–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Billon, Philippe. 2000. The Political Economy of Resource Wars. In Angola’s War Economy: The Role of Oil and Diamonds, edited by J. Cilliers and C. Dietrich, 21–43. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Loureiro, Maria Rita. 1998. L’Internationalization des milieux dirigeants au Brazil. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 121/122: 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, John W. 1980. The World Polity and the Authority of the Nation State. In Studies of the Modern World System, edited by A. Bergesen. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Neumann, Iver B. 2002. Kosovo and the End of the Legitimate Warring State. In Mapping European Security After Kosovo, edited by P. van Ham and S. Medvedev, 66–81. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pauly, Louis W. 1997. Who Elected the Bankers? Surveillance and Control in the World Economy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pizzorno, Alessandro. 1987. Politics Unbound. In Changing Boundaries of the Political: Essays on the Evolving Balance Between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe, edited by Charles S. Maier, 27–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poirier, Jean. 1993. Une nouvelle forme de violence institutionelle: la violence par préténtion. In La Violence et l’Etat. Formes et Evolution d’un Monopole, edited by E. Le Roy and T. von Trotha, 183–198. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  40. Porter, Tony. 1999. The Transnational Agenda for Financial Regulation in Developing Countries. In Financial Globalization and Democracy in Emerging Markets, edited by L. E. Armijo, 91–117. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  41. Reno, William. 1998. Warlord Politics and African States. Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  42. Shaw, Martin. 1996. Civil Society and the Media in Global Crises. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  43. —. 2000. Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomson, Janice. 1994. Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns: State-Building and Extraterritorial Violence in Early Modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Cambridge, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. —. 1998. International Communities, Secure or Otherwise. In Security Communities, edited by E. Adler and M. Barnett, 397–412. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Ham, Peter, and Sergei Medvedev, eds. 2002. Mapping European Security After Kosovo. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Violence, Modernity, Silence: From Max Weber to International Relations. In The Political Subject of Violence, edited by D. Campbell and M. Dillon, 137–160. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  51. —. 1994. Social Movements/World Politics. Millennium. Journal of International Studies 23 (3): 669–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wolin, Sheldon S. 1963. Violence and the Western Political Tradition. American journal of Orthopsychiatry 33: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zürn, M., G. Walter, S. Dreher, and M. Beisheim. 2000. Globalisierung und die Handlungsfähigkeit des Nationalstaats. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 7(2): 297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Markus Lederer and Philipp S. Müller 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Leander

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations