Democratizing Global Governance: Beyond the Domestic Analogy

  • Heikki Patomäki

Abstract

Criticism of global governance leads to the search for alternatives. Would it be possible to make systems of global governance more responsive to the most salient problems of humanity, such as poverty and oppression, ecological threats and disasters, and the enormous destructive powers of modern weapons systems? How could the systems of governance be made more responsive? Would it be possible to break the dual hegemony of neoclassical economics and the United States, and refashion the principles of global economic governance? What should these alternative principles be?

Keywords

Europe Turkey Sonal Metaphor Ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alker, H. 1981. Dialectical Foundations of Global Disparities. International Studies Quarterly 25 (1): 9–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alker, Jr., H., T. Biersteker, and T. Inoguchi. 1989. From Imperial Power Balancing to People’s Wars: Searching for Order in the Twentieth Century. In International/Intertextual Relations. Postmodern Readings of the World Politics, edited by J. Der Derian and M. Shapiro, 135–162. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M. et al. 1998. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  4. Archibugi, D. 1998. Principles of Cosmopolitan Democracy. In Re-Imagining Political Community. Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy, edited by D. Archibugi, D. Held, and M. Köhler, 198–228. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Archibugi, D., and D. Held, eds. 1995. Cosmopolitan Democracy. An Agenda for a New World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Archibugi, D., D. Held, and M. Köhler, eds. 1998. Re-Imagining Political Community. Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barkawi, T., and M. Laffey. 2001. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  9. —. 1993. Dialectic. The Pulse of Freedom. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Braithwaite, J., and P. Drahos. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bull, H. 1977. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Connolly, W. 1989. Identity and Difference in World Politics. In International/Intertextual Relations. Postmodern Readings of World Politics, edited by J. Der Derian and M. Shapiro, 323–342. Lexington, MA: Lexington books.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1991. Democracy and Territoriality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 20 (3).Google Scholar
  14. —. 1995. The Ethos of Pluralization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deutsch, K. W. et al. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. International Organisation in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NL: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Held, D. 1980. An Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. —. 1991. Democracy, the Nation-State and the Global System. In Political Theory Today, edited by D. Held. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. — 1995. Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. —. 2003. “The Will to Change the World,” an interview of D. Held by A. Lent. Available at http://www.fabianglobalforum.net.Google Scholar
  20. Held, D., and H. Patomäki. (Forthcoming). A Dialogue on the Underpinnings of Global Democracy. In Theory, Culture & Society (special issue on global democracy).Google Scholar
  21. Hirst, P., and G. Thomson. 2000. Global Myths and National Policies. In Global Democracy. Key Debates, edited by B. Holden, 47–59. Routledge: London & New York.Google Scholar
  22. Holden, B., ed. 1999. Global Democracy. Key Debates. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Kant, I. 1983. Perpetual Peace and other Essays. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company [“May be true in theory, but is of no practical use,” 1793].Google Scholar
  24. Koselleck, R. 1983. Time and Revolutionary Language. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 9 (2): 117–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Lijphart, A. 1981. Karl W. Deutsch and the New Paradigm in International Relations. In From National Development to Global Community. Essays in Honour of Karl W. Deutsch, edited by R. Merritt and B. Russett, 233–251. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  27. Linklater, A. 1990. Beyond Realism and Marxism. Critical Theory and International Relations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGrew, A., ed. 1997. The Transformation of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with the Open University.Google Scholar
  29. Patomäki, H. 2000. Republican Sphere and the Governance of Global Political Economy. In Value Pluralism, Normative Theory and IR, edited by M. Lensu and J.-S. Fritz, 60–95. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. —. 2001. Democratising Globalisation. The Leverage of the Tobin Tax. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  31. —. 2002a. From East to West: Emergent Global Philosophies—Beginnings of the End of Western Dominance? Theory, Culture and Society 19 (3): 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. —. 2002b. After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patomäki, H., 2003. Problems of Democratising Global Governance. European Journal of International Relations 9 (3): 347–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patomäki, H., and L. A. Denys. 2002. Draft Treaty on Global Currency Transactions Tax. NIGD Discussion Paper 1/2002: Helsinki & Nottingham, page 24.Google Scholar
  35. Patomäki, H., and T. Teivainen. 2004. A Possible World. Democratic Transformation of Global Institutions. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  36. Patomäki, H., and, C. Wight. 2000. After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism. International Studies Quarterly 44 (2): 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perraton, J. 2000. Hirst and Thompson’s “Global Myths and National Policies.” In Global Democracy. Key Debates, edited by Barry Holden, 60–72. Routledge: London & New York.Google Scholar
  38. Polanyi, K. 1957 [1944]. The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ruggie, J. 1998. Constructing the World Polity. Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saward, M. 2000. A Critique of Held. In Global Democracy. Key Debates, edited by B. Holden, 32–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Sayer, A. 1992. Method in Social Science. A Realist Approach, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. —. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Todorov, T. 1984. The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other, translated by R. Howard. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  44. Unger, R. M. 1998. Democracy Realized. The Progressive Alternative. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  45. Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. —, 1995. “Ajallisia yhteyksiä ja moninaisia identiteettejä: kohti uutta maailman-politiikkaa?” [Temporal Connections and Plural Identities: Towards New World Politics?], an interview of R. B. J. Walker by H. Patomäki, Kosmopolis 25 (4): 23–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Markus Lederer and Philipp S. Müller 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heikki Patomäki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations