Skip to main content

Global Governance as the Hegemonic Project of Transatlantic Civil Society

  • Chapter
Book cover Criticizing Global Governance

Abstract

There is an old tradition of politics claiming supremacy over the market and civil society. One may reasonably doubt whether politics was ever able to make good this claim. But whereas it was somewhat plausible to talk about the supremacy of politics during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, after the end of the Cold War this claim has come to be more and more questionable. More often than ever before, economic and societal actors bypass their governments and challenge the autonomy of political decision making. At the international level, it has become an accepted wisdom that globalization and global governance are making inroads into the sphere of politics among nations. This implies that the time-honored concepts provided by the academic discipline of International Relations (IR) are less and less adequate to capture the reality of world affairs. Accordingly, it is increasingly important to engage in the conceptualization of novel analytic instruments. The concepts of globalization and its offspring, global governance, both hold the promise to facilitate such a novel conceptualization. Without denying the importance of globalization, this essay focuses on global governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alger, Chadwick. 2002. The Emerging Roles of NGOs in the UN system: From Article 71 to a Peoples Millennium Assembly. Global Governance 8(1): 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, Richard K. 1983. Three Modes of Economism. International Studies Quarterly 27 (4): 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. Staaten im Weltmarkt: zur Handlungsfähigkeit von Staaten trotz wirtschaftlicher Globalisierung. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bocock, Robert. 1986. Hegemony. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Global Governance. 1995. Our Global Neighborhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drache, Daniel, ed. 2001. The Market or the Public Domain? Global Governance and the Asymmetry of Power. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1971. The Political System: An Inquiry on the State of Political Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, Lawrence S. 1995. What is Global Governance? Global Governance 1: 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, Vivienne. 1996. L’horreur économique. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. Une étrange dictature. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jörg. 2001. The Meaning of New Medievalism. European Journal of International Relations 7 (4): 475–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004. The Neomedieval Renaissance: Global Governance and International Law in the New Middle Ages. In Governance and International Legal Theory, edited by I. R Dekker and Wouter G. Werner, 3–36. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhof.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Paul, and Grahame Thompson. 1996. Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz, Ronnie D. 1996. Global Civil Society and Global Environmental Governance: The Politics of Nature from Place to Planet. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin, Karen T. 1999. Constructing environmental security and ecological interdependence. Global Governance 5: 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2nd vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte, Marie Josée. 1999. Global Governance and the Global Political Economy: Three Texts in Search of a Synthesis. Global Governance 5(1): 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, Jessica T. 1997. Power Shift. Foreign Affairs 76 (1): 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, Ruben P. 1995. The Provision and Financing of Universal Public Goods. In Global Governance: Ethics and Economics of the World Order, edited by M. Desai and P. Redfern, 39–59. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelman, James H., and Robert Johnston. 1999. The Globalization of Organized Crime, the Courtesan State, and the Corruption of Civil Society. Global Governance 5: 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, and Marc Williams. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaway, Marina. 2001. Corporatism Goes Global: International Organizations, nongovernmental Organization Networks, and Transnational Business. Global Governance 7 (3): 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patomäki, Heiki. 2001. Democratizing Globalization: The Leverage of the Tobin Tax. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Mark A., and Gregory C. Shaffer, eds. 2001. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, Aseem, and Jeffrey A. Hart, eds. 1999. Globalization and Governance. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke, Wolfgang H. 1998. Global Public Policy: Governing without Government. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinicke, Wolfgang H., and Francis M. Deng. 2000. Critical Choices: The United Nations, Networks, and the Future of Global Governance. Ottawa: IDRC Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N., and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, eds. 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John Gerald, 1982. International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order. International Organization 36 (2): 379–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, 1998. Globalization and the Embedded Liberalism Compromise: The End of an Era? In Internationale Wirtschaft, nationale Demokratie: Herausforderungen für die Demokratietheorie, edited by W. Streeck, 79–97. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 1998. Demokratie in der transnationalen Politik. In Internationale Wirtschaft, nationale Demokratie: Herausforderungen für die Demokratietheorie, edited by W. Streeck, 151–174. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, Jan Aart. 1997. Global Capitalism and the State. International Affairs 73 (3): 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Gerhard, ed. 2002. Progressive Governance for the 21st Century. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1982. Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis. International Organization 36 (2): 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1998. Mad Money: When Markets Outgrow Governments. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, Gunther. 1993. Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toope, Stephen J. 2000. Emerging patterns of governance and international law. In The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, edited by M. Byers, 91–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussie, Diana, and Maria Pia Riggirozzo. 2001. Pressing Ahead with New Procedures for Old Machinery: Global Governance and Civil Society. In. Global Governance and the United Nations System, edited by V. Rittberger, 158–180. New York: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of International Associations, ed. 2002. Yearbook of International Organizations: Guide to Global and Civil Society Networks 2002/2003, 39th ed., 2nd vol. München: Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Stephen K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, Peter. 2000. From “Consultative arrangements” to “Partnership”: The Changing Status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN. Global Governance 6 (2): 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Oran R., ed. 1997. Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumach, Andreas. 2002. Der “strategische Handel” des Generalsekretärs: ernüchternde Erfahrungen mit dem Globalen Pakt von Davos. Vereinte Nationen 50 (1): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Markus Lederer and Philipp S. Müller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friedrichs, J. (2005). Global Governance as the Hegemonic Project of Transatlantic Civil Society. In: Lederer, M., Müller, P.S. (eds) Criticizing Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979513_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics