Skip to main content

Court–President Clashes: The Cases of Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, and Bill Clinton

  • Chapter
The Presidency and the Constitution

Abstract

Over the course of U.S. history, there have been a number of significant clashes between presidents and Courts. Three of the most important were the challenges posed by the presidencies of Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and William Jefferson Clinton. Although each poses a different set of circumstances and issues, each is an exemplar of how interactions between the president and the judiciary have shaped these presidencies. Most of the cases mentioned in this chapter are reprinted in the chapters to come. We offer these three accounts to provide an instructive narrative underscoring the interplay of law, politics, and interbranch jockeying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Clinton Rossiter, The Supreme Court and the Commander-in-Chief (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1951), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard N. Current, “The Lincoln Presidents,” Presidential Studies Quarterly (Winter 1979): 32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robert H. Jackson, The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy (New York: Vintage, 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Philip Abbott, The Exemplary Presidency: Franklin D. Roosevelt and the American Political Tradition (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1990), chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. William E. Leuchtenburg, “Court-Packing Plan,” in Otis L. Graham and Meghan Robinson Wander, eds., Franklin D. Roosevelt: His Life and Times (Boston: G.K. Hall, 1985), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Gray Adler, “Court, Constitution, and Foreign Affairs,” in Adler and Larry George, eds., The Constitution and the Conduct of America Foreign Policy (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David J. Danelski, “The Saboteurs’ Case,” Journal of Supreme Court History 1 (1996): 80. See also Louis Fisher, Nazi Saboteurs on Trial (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard M. Pious, “The Paradox of Clinton Winning and the Presidency Losing,” Political Science Quarterly 114, no. 4 (1999–2000): 590.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Gray Adler and Michael A. Genovese, eds., The Presidency and the Law: The Clinton Legacy (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Michael A. Genovese

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Genovese, M.A., Spitzer, R.J. (2005). Court–President Clashes: The Cases of Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, and Bill Clinton. In: The Presidency and the Constitution. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979391_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics