The Seminar Paper

  • Gregory M. Colón Semenza

Abstract

Almost every serious graduate course in the humanities culminates in a final written assignment that I refer to in this chapter as the “seminar paper.” Because the seminar paper both allows you to demonstrate your knowledge of the relevant course material and prepares you for the difficult tasks of dissertation writing and scholarly publishing, it might accurately be understood as the sine qua non of your academic training. Nonetheless, for most graduate students, confronting the seminar paper each semester is akin to launching an arctic expedition without a compass or a map; you may have some sense of where you want to go but painfully little guidance about how to get there. Although there exists no universally applicable set of instructions for writing a successful seminar paper, especially across disciplines, you can take certain steps that will help you to master the form—steps which, in ideal situations, might even lead to publication. This chapter focuses on the perils and pitfalls of seminar paper writing—and how to avoid them. Since wise students approach writing seminar papers just as they approach writing articles, this chapter serves as a supplement to chapter 10, which deals with the publication process. The major subjects include:
  • The value of emulation

  • The construction of a reading list

  • The organization of materials

  • The note-taking process

  • The formulation of an argument

  • The context of an argument

  • The evidence of an argument

  • The process of revising for publication

Keywords

Dust Sine Lost Dick Ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Sean C. Grass, The Self in the Cell: Narrating the Victorian Prisoner (New York and London: Routledge, 2003), 7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edward Muir and Guido Ruggiero, Microhistory and the Lost Peoples of Europe, trans. Eren Branch (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991), xviii.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    William Germano, Getting it Published: A Guide for Scholars and Anyone Else Serious about Serious Books (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2001), 70.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gregory M. Colón Semenza, Sport, Politics, and Literature in the English Renaissance (Newark, DE. and London: University of Delaware Press, 2003), 139.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stanley Fish, Surprised by Sin: The Reader in “Paradise Lost,” (1967), 2nd edition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997), lxxi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), 17.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stephen Jay Gould, The Mismeasure of Man (1981), revised ed. (New York and London: W.W. Norton and Co., 1996), 52–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gregory M. Colón Semenza 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory M. Colón Semenza

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations