The Offering of Food and the Creation of Order: The Practice of Sacrifice in Early China

  • Michael Puett

Abstract

Anthropologists of contemporary Chinese religion have often pointed out that the lines between spirits, ghosts, and ancestors are highly permeable. Indeed, the primary difference between them is to be found in food—both in the types of food offered and the ways in which it is given. Ghosts are dead humans who are not fed by living descendants (and thus become hungry and highly dangerous, but also objects of offerings by individuals outside of more established avenues of worship); ancestors are fed by their living descendants (and thus are not dangerous and may even be helpful to the descendants); and spirits are fed by larger numbers of people than just simply their descendants (and thus become far more powerful than ghosts or ancestors). Moreover, each of these can become any of the others if the food offerings are changed: a ghost can become an ancestor, an ancestor can become a ghost, a ghost can become a spirit. In other words, it is living humans, through the act of feeding, who define the differences between spirits, ghosts, and ancestors.1

Keywords

Burning Clay Smoke Straw Triad 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Boileau, Gilles (1998–99). “Some Ritual Elaborations on Cooking and Sacrifice in Late Zhou and Western Han Texts” Early China 23–24: 89–123.Google Scholar
  2. Brashier, K. E. (1996). “Han Thanatology and the Division of ‘Souls,’” Early China 21: 125–58.Google Scholar
  3. Campany, Robert (1992). “Xunzi and Durkheim as Theorists of Ritual Practice,” in Frank Reynolds and David Tracy eds., Discourse and Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, Michael (1985). “Personation of the Dead in Ancient China,” Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages 24: 1–107.Google Scholar
  5. Falkenhausen, Lothar von (1994). “Sources of Taoism: Reflections on Archaeological Indicators of Religious Change in Eastern Zhou China,” Taoist Resources 5.2: 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. Harrel, C. Stevan (1974). “When a God Becomes a Ghost,” in Arthur P. Wolf ed., Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 193–206.Google Scholar
  7. Jordan, David (1972). Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors: The Folk Religion of a Taiwanese Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Keightley, David N. (2004). “The Making of the Ancestors: Late Shang Religion and Its Legacy,” in John Lagerwey ed., Religion and Chinese Society. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, vol. 1: 3–63.Google Scholar
  9. Kern, Martin (2001). “Ritual, Text, and the Formation of the Canon: Historical Transitions of wen in Early China,” T’oung Pao 87.1–3: 43–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Legge, James (1885). Li Chi: Book of Rites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Loewe, Michael (1974). Crisis and Conflict in Han China: 104 B.C.-A.D. 9. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  12. Loewe, Michael — (1979). Ways to Paradise: The Chinese Quest for Immortality. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Nylan, Michael (1997). “Han Classicists Writing about Their Own Tradition,” Philosophy East and West 47.2: 133–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nylan, Michael — (1999). “A Problematic Model: The Han ‘Orthodox Synthesis.’ Then and Now,” in Kai-wing Chow et al. eds., Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Her meneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 17–56.Google Scholar
  15. Nylan, Michael (2001). The Five “Confucian” Classics. New Haven:Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Puett, Michael (2001). The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Puett, Michael — (2002). To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center.Google Scholar
  18. Puett, Michael — (2004). “The Ethics of Responding Properly: The Notion of Qing in Early Chinese Thought,” in Halvor Eifring ed., Love and Emotions in Traditional Chinese Literature. Leiden: Brill, 37–68.Google Scholar
  19. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1965). “Religion and Society,” in Structure and Function in Primitive Society. NewYork: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rawson, Jessica (1999). “Ancient Chinese Ritual as Seen in the Material Record,” in Joseph P McDermott ed., State and Court Ritual in China. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 20–49.Google Scholar
  21. Rawson, Jessica — (2000). “Cosmological Systems as Sources of Art, Ornament and Design,” Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 72: 133–89.Google Scholar
  22. Sangren, Steven (1987). History and Magical Power in a Chinese Community. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Seidel, Anna (1982). “Tokens of Immortality in Han Graves,” Numen 29: 79–114.Google Scholar
  24. Seidel, Anna — (1987). “Traces of Han Religion in Funeral Texts Found in Tombs,” in Akitsuki Kan’ei 秋月観英 ed., Dōkyō to shūkyō bunka 道教と宗教文化. Tokyo: Hirakawa shuppansha, 21–57.Google Scholar
  25. Sterckx, Roel (2002). The Animal and the Daemon in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  26. Watson, James L. and Evelyn S. Rawski (1988). Death Ritual in Late Imperial and Modern China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Weller, Robert P. (1987). Unities and Diversities in Chinese Religion. Seattle: University of Washington Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson, Thomas (2002). “Sacrifice and the Imperial Cult of Confucius,” History of Religions 41.3: 251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wolf, Arthur P. (1974). “Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors,” in Arthur P. Wolf ed., Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 131–82.Google Scholar
  30. Wu Hung (1988). “From Temple to Tomb: Ancient Chinese Art and Religion in Transition,” Early China 13: 78–115.Google Scholar
  31. Yu Ying-Shih (1987). “‘O Soul, Come Back!’ A Study in the Changing Conceptions of the Soul and Afterlife in Pre-Buddhist China,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 47.2: 363–95.Google Scholar
  32. Zito, Angela (1997). Of Body and Brush: Grand Sacrifice as Text/Performance in Eighteenth-Century China. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Roel Sterckx 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Puett

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations