Advertisement

Communicative Action and the Social Construction of Shari‘a in Pakistan

  • Muhammad Khalid Masud
Part of the Culture and Religion in International Relations book series (CRIR)

Abstract

The shari‘a, in common Muslim usage, refers to a comprehensive concept of law, which includes ritual and dietary rules, as well as laws about family, commerce, and social relations. The shari‘a had been almost marginalized in the public sphere emerging during the colonial period in the 19th century. Most Western experts on Islamic law saw no future for shari‘a in a modern society, which was conceived of as essentially secular, and which had no place for religion in public affairs. But shari‘a reappeared in the emerging postcolonial public spheres in a number of Muslim majority societies in the 20th century. This trend raises a number of questions about the conception of the public sphere: specifically, does the emergence of a public sphere necessarily presuppose a secular society? Is it not possible to speak of public sphere in Muslim societies? Does the revival of shari‘a reflect the decline of public sphere?

Keywords

Communicative Action Public Sphere Social Construction Public Reason Strategic Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.N.D. 1976. Law Reform in the Muslim World. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, John. 1954. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. H.L.A. Hart, London: George Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  3. D’Agostino, Fred. 1996. Free Public Reason: Making it Up as We Go. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dy, Manuel B. Jr. 1998. “The Ethics of Communicative Action: Habermas’s Discourse Analysis.” In The Humanization of Technology and Chinese Culture, ed. Tomonobu Imamichi et al., Washington: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  5. Ehrlich, Eugene. 1936. Fundamental Principles of Sociology of Law. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eickelman, Dale F., and Armando Salvatore. 2004 [ 2002 ]. “Muslim Publics.” In Public Islam and Common Good, ed. Armando Salvatore and Dale F. Eickelman, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 3–27.Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996 [1992]. Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William Rehg, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ibn ‘Abidin. 1884. Nashr al-ûrf fi bina ba‘d al-ahkam ‘ala al-ûrf. Damascus: Dar al-ma‘arif.Google Scholar
  9. Ibn Khaldun. 1989. Muqaddima. Tehran: Intisharat Istiqlal.Google Scholar
  10. Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lloyd, Dennis 1979. Introduction to Jurisprudence. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
  12. Mahmood, Tahir. 1972. The Family Law Reform in the Muslim World. Bombay: N.M. Tripathy.Google Scholar
  13. Mahmood, Tahir. 1987. Personal Law in Islamic Countries. New Delhi: Academy of Law and Religion.Google Scholar
  14. Makdisi, George. 1981. The Rise of Colleges. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Makdisi, George. 1984. “The Juridical Theology of Shafi‘i: Origins and Significance of Usul al-Fiqh.” Studia Islamica, 59: 5–47.Google Scholar
  16. Makdisi, George. 1991. Religion, Law and Learning in Classical Islam. Hampshire: Variorum.Google Scholar
  17. Malik, Jamal. 1996. Colonization of Islam, Dissolution of Traditional Institutions in Pakistan. New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
  18. Masud, Muhammad Khalid. 1996. “Apostasy and Judicial Separation in British India.” In Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas, ed. Muhammad Khalid Masud, Brinkley Messick, and David S. Powers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 193–203.Google Scholar
  19. Masud, Muhammad Khalid. 2000 [1995]. Shatibi’s Philosophy of Islamic Law. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.Google Scholar
  20. Mehdi, Rubya. 1994. The Islamization of the Law in Pakistan. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
  21. Nasir, Jamal. J. 1986. The Islamic Law of Personal Status. London: Graham and Trotman.Google Scholar
  22. Pearl, David. 1979. A Textbook on Muslim Personal Law. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  23. Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rehg, William. 1996. “Translator’s Introduction” to Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, Richard D. 1986. “Law and Normative Order.” In Law and Social Sciences, ed. Leon Lispon and Santon Wheeler, New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 63–107.Google Scholar
  26. al-Shatibi, Abu Ishaq. 1915. Al-I’tisam. Cairo: Mustafa Muhammad.Google Scholar
  27. al-Shatibi, Abu Ishaq. 1975 [1883]. Al-Muwafaqat fi-usul al-shariâ, 4 vols. Cairo: al-Maktabat al-tijariyya.Google Scholar
  28. Waliullah, Shah. n.d. Hujjatullah al-baligha, 2 vols. Lahore: al-Maktabat al-salafiyya.Google Scholar
  29. Wheeler, Brannon M. 1996. Applying the Canon in Islam, The Authorization and Maintenance of Interpretative Reasoning in Hanafi Scholarship. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Armando Salvatore and Mark LeVine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Khalid Masud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations