Cognitive Science and Christian Theology

  • Charlene P. E. Burns

Abstract

Concerns about the impact of scientific discoveries on Christian theology have been a reality for at least 400 years. From Copernicus and Galileo came the first major challenges to humanity as the imago dei and its home as the center of God’s purpose-filled creation. Subsequent discoveries compelled theologians to rethink everything from the meaning of miracles to the creation story itself. Again and again, doomsayers and scientific reductionists decreed the demise of religion under the burden of scientific “truth.” Yet religion survived and theologians carried on the task of interpreting doctrine in light of a rapidly changing world. But today, say some, theology might finally collapse under the weight of science.This is so because the cognitive sciences offer a challenge to so many aspects of theological reflection. As science uncovers the ways in which neurochemistry affects the mental life, serious questions arise about what it means to say we have a soul, that humanity is created in the image of God, that we sin yet have free will, that we can encounter the divine through prayer, mystical experience, and revelation, even to say that there is a personal God.

Keywords

Dust Kelly Stake Metaphor Rause 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aquinas, T. 1964. Summa Theologi, Book I, Questions 75 and 76. Blackfriars ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Ashbrook, J. 1984. Neurotheology: The working brain and the work of theology. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 19, 331–350.Google Scholar
  3. Ashbrook, J. and Albright, C. 1997. The Humanizing Brain: Where Religion and Neuroscience Mee. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
  4. Augustine, A. 1980. City of Go. H. Bettenson (trans.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Barbour, I. 1990. Religion in an Age of Scienc. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.Google Scholar
  6. Bellah, R. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Lif. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained:The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Though. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bracken, J.A. 2004. Reconsidering fundamental issues: Emergent monism and the classical doctrine of the soul. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 39, 161–174.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, W.S., Murphy, N., and Malony, H.N. (eds.). 1998. Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and the Theological Portraits of Human Natur. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, C.P.E. 2002. Divine Becoming: Rethinking Jesus and Incarnatio. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chalmers, D.J. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studie, 2, 200–209.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, J.W. 2000. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debat. Grand Rapids:William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  13. Crick, F. 1994. The Astonishing Hypothesis:The Scientific Search for a Sou. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. Cullman, O. 1958. Immortality of the Soul or Resurrection of the DeadLondon: Epworth Press.Google Scholar
  15. Damasio, A. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousnes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  16. D’Aquili, E. and Newberg, A. 1999. The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experienc. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  17. Delio, I. 2003. Brain science and the biology of belief: A theological response. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 38, 573–585.Google Scholar
  18. Descartes, R. 1637. The Philosophical Works of Descarte. vol. 1. (1970).Google Scholar
  19. Donald, M. 2001. A Mind so Rare:The Evolution of Human Consciousnes. New York:W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  20. Edwards, P. (ed.) 1999. Immortalit.Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  21. Elizabeth S. Haldane and Ross G.R.T. (trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Feit, J.S. 2003. Probing Neurotheology’s Brain, or Critiquing an Emerging Quasi-Scienc. Paper presented to the Critical Theory and Discourses on Religion Selection, American Academy of Religion, 2003 Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, November 22–25, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Flanagan, O. 2002. The Problem of the Soul:Tw o Visions of the Mind and How to Reconcile The. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gillman, N. 1995. The Death of Death: Resurrection and Immortality in Jewish Though. Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Gorsky, J. 1999. Conscience in Jewish thought, in Jayne Hoose (ed.), Conscience in World Religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, pp. 129–154.Google Scholar
  26. Jewett, P.K. 1996. Who We Are: Our Dignity as Huma. Marguerite Shuster (ed.). Grand Rapids:William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, J. 1996. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind–Body Problem and Mental Causatio. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Murphy, N.(Winter 1999).Downward causation and why the mental matters.CTNS Bulleti, 19 (1), 13.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy, N. and Ellis, G. 1996. On the Moral Nature of the Univers. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  30. Newberg, Andrew, Eugene D’Aquili, and Vince Rause. 2001. Why God Won’t Go Away: Brain Science and the Biology of Belie. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  31. Pannenberg, W. 1985. Anthropology in Theological Perspectiv. Matthew J. O’Connell (trans.). Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
  32. Persinger, M. 1987. Neuropsychological Bases of God Belief. New York: Praeger Books.Google Scholar
  33. Peters, Ted 1999. Resurrection of the very embodied soul? Russell et al. (eds.), p. 38.Google Scholar
  34. Peterson, G. 2003. Minding God:Theology and the Congnitive Science(Minneapolis: Fortress Press).Google Scholar
  35. Peterson, G.R. 1997. Cognitive science:What one needs to know. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 32, 615–627.Google Scholar
  36. Russell, R.J., Murphy, N., Meyering, T.C., and Arbib, A.E. (eds.) 1999. Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Actio. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, H. 2001. Why Religion Matters:The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelie. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.Google Scholar
  38. Tertullian. 1978. A treatise on the soul, in Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (eds.), Ante-Nicene Fathers.The Writings of the Fathers Down to A.D. 32. Grand Rapids:William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  39. Teske, J. 1996. The spiritual limits of neuropsychological life. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 31, 209–234.Google Scholar
  40. Thatcher, A. 1987. Christian theism and the concept of a person, in A. Peacocke and Grant Gillett (eds.), Persons and Personality:A Contemporary Inquir. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 180–196.Google Scholar
  41. Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognitio. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  42. Wacome, D.H. 2004. Reductionism’s demise: Cold comfort. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Scienc, 39, 321–338.Google Scholar
  43. Ware, K. 2002. How Do We Enter the Heart? Paths to the Heart: Sufism and the Christian Eas(especially pp. 2–23). James Cutsinger (ed.), Bloomington, IN:World Wisdom.Google Scholar
  44. Wolfson, H.A. 1993. Immortality and resurrection in the philosophy of the church fathers, in Everett Ferguson, David Scholer, and Paul Finney (eds.), Doctrines of Human Nature, Sin, and Salvation in the Early Church, vol. X, Studies in Early Christianit. New York: Garland Books, pp. 301–336.Google Scholar
  45. Zizioulas, J.D. 1985. Being as Communio. Crestwood, NY: St.Vladimir’s Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kelly Bulkeley 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlene P. E. Burns

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations