Advertisement

Brain, Mind, and Spirit—A Clinician’s Perspective, or Why I Am Not Afraid of Dualism

  • James W. Jones

Abstract

Physicalism reigns supreme. Even theologians have rushed to embrace it. Not the “greedy” (Dennett) reductionistic physicalism of yore but a new, kindler, gentler physicalism called (of course!) “nonreductive physicalism.” Rather than the militantly antireligious drive of earlier reductive materialists, the new nonreductive types insist that theirs is a position fundamentally affirming of the religious and moral life (Brown et al. 1998). Rather than eliminating the features of human life on which religion depends, this form of physicalism affirms that “consciousness and religious awareness are emergent properties and they have top–down causal influence on the body” (Murphy 1998, p. 131).“The long-banned subjective states and qualities are now put up front—in the driver’s seat as it were...,” enthuses one of this position’s most famous spokesman, the Nobel laureate Roger Sperry (1991, p. 244). I fail to share this enthusiasm. Not because I am an eliminative materialist

Keywords

Behavioral Medicine Emergent Property Causal Power Mental Property Conscious Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andresen, J. 2000. Meditation meets behavioral medicine: The story of experimental research on meditation. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, 17–74.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J. 1998. Zen and the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, J. 1996, Hypnosis and Suggestion in the Treatment of Pain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Basmajian, J.V. 1983. Biofeedback—Principles and Practices for Clinicians. Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  5. Bielfeldt, D. 1999a. Can downward causation make the mental matter? A reply to Meyering and Murphy. CTNS Bulletin, 19/4, 11–21.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1999b. Mancey Murphy’s nonreductive physicalism. Zygon, 34/4, 619–628.Google Scholar
  7. —. 2001. Can Western monotheism avoid substance dualism? Zygon,36/1, 153–177.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, D. and Fromm, E. 1987. Hypnosis and Behavioral Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, W., Murphy, N., and Malony, N. (eds.) 1998. Whatever Happened to the Soul? Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, L., Speca, M. Petal, K., and Goodey, E. 2003. Minfulness-based stress reduction in relation to quality of life, mood, symptoms of stress, and immune parameters in breast and prostate cancer outpatients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 571–581.Google Scholar
  11. Chalmers, D. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219.Google Scholar
  12. Clayton, P. 1999. Neuroscience, the person, and God, in R. Russell, N. Murphy, T. Meyering, and M.Arbib (eds.), Neuroscience and the Person. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 181–214.Google Scholar
  13. Davidson, R., Kabat-Zinn, J., Shumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S., Urbanowski, F., Harrington, A., Bonus, K., and Sheridan, J. 2003.Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 564–570.Google Scholar
  14. Deikman, A. 2000. A functional approach to mysticism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 7, 75–92.Google Scholar
  15. DuBreuil, S. and Spanos, N. 1993. Psychological treatment of warts, in J. Rhue, S. Lynn, and I. Kirsh (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Hypnosis.Washington:American Psychological Association, pp. 623–648.Google Scholar
  16. Eccles, J. 1982. Mind and Brain. New York: Paragon.Google Scholar
  17. Feldman, J. 2004.The neurobiology of pain, affect, and hypnosis.American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 46, 187–200.Google Scholar
  18. Findlay, J. 1952. Goedelian sentences.A non-numerical approach. Mind,51, 259–265.Google Scholar
  19. Goldapple, K., Segal, Z., Garson, C., Lau, M., Bieling, P., Kennedy, S., and Mayberg, H. 2004. Modulation of cortical–limbic pathways in major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 34–41.Google Scholar
  20. Goleman, D. 2003. Destructive Emotions. NewYork: Bantam.Google Scholar
  21. Green, E. and Green, A. 1977. Beyond Biofeedback. NewYork: Delacorte.Google Scholar
  22. Griffin, D. 1998. Unsnarling the World Knot: Consciousness, Freedom and the Mind–Body Problem.Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. —. 2002. Scientific naturalism, the mind–body relation, and religious experience. Zygon, 37, 361–380.Google Scholar
  24. Heil, J. and Mele, A. 1993. Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hofstadter, D. R. and Dennett, D.C. (eds.) 1981. The Mind’s I. New York. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Hutto, D. 1998. An ideal solution to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5/3, 328–341.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, J. 1981. The Texture of Knowledge. Lanaham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  28. —. 1984. The Redemption of Matter. Lanaham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  29. —. 1992. Can neuroscience provide a complete account of human nature. Zygon, 27, 187–202.Google Scholar
  30. —. 2003. The Mirror of God: Christian Faith as Spiritual Practice—Lessons from Buddhism and Psychotherapy. NewYork: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  31. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2001, 8/9–10.Google Scholar
  32. Kabat-Zinn, J. 1990. Full Catastrophe Living. New York: Delacorte.Google Scholar
  33. Kabat-Zinn, J., Massion, A.O., Kristeller, J., Peterson L.G., Fletcher, K.E., Pbert, L., Lenderking, W.R., and Santorelli, S.F. 1992. Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychology, 149, 936–943.Google Scholar
  34. Kihlstrom, J. 2002. The seductions of materialism and the pleasures of dualism. Journal of Conscious Studies, 9, 30–34.Google Scholar
  35. Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kosslyn, S., Alpert, N., Thompson, S., Weise, C., Chambris, S., Hamilton, S., Rauch, S., and Buonanno, F. 1993.Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 263–287.Google Scholar
  37. Kristeller, J.L. and Hallett, B. 1999. Effects of a meditation-based intervention in the treatment of binge eating. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(3), 357–363.Google Scholar
  38. Libet, B. 1967. Responses of human somatosensory cortex to stimuli below threshold for conscious experience. Science, 158, 1597–1600.Google Scholar
  39. —. 1978. Neuronal versus subjective timing for a conscious sensory experience, in P.A. Buser and A. Rougeul-Buser (eds.), Cerebral Correlates of Conscious Experience.Amsterdam: North Holland Press.Google Scholar
  40. —. 1982. Subjective and neuronal time factors in conscious sensory experience and their implications for the mind–Brain relationship, in J. Eccles (ed.), Mind and Brain. New York: Paragon, pp. 99–102.Google Scholar
  41. —. 1996. Neural processes in conscious experience, in M. Velmans, (ed.), The Science of Consciousness. London: Routledge, pp. 96–117.Google Scholar
  42. Linehan, M. 1993. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  43. Lucas, J. 1964. Minds, machines, and goedel, in J.Anderson (ed.), Minds and Machines. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Marlett, G.A. and Kristeller, J.L. 1999. Mindfulness and meditation, in W.R. Miller (ed.), Integrating Spirituality in Treatment. American Psychological Association Books, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
  45. McGinn, C. 1989. Can we solve the mind–body problem? Mind, 88, 349–366.Google Scholar
  46. Meyering, T. 1999, Mind matters, in R.Russell, N.Murphy, T.Meyering, and M.Arbib (eds.), Neuroscience and the Person. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 165–180.Google Scholar
  47. Morowitz, H.J. 1981. Rediscovering the mind, in D.R. Hofstader and D.C. Dennett (eds.), The Mind’s I.New York: Basic Books, pp. 34–42.Google Scholar
  48. Murphy, N. 1998. Non-reductive physicalism: Philosophical issues, in W. Brown, and N. Murphy, and N. Malony (eds.), Whatever Happened to the Soul? Minneapolis: Fortress Press, pp. 127–148.Google Scholar
  49. Murphy, N. 1999a. Supervenience and the downward efficacy of the mental:A nonreductive physicalist account of human action, in R. Russell, N. Murphy, T. Meyering, and M. Arbib (eds.), Neuroscience and the Person. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 147–164.Google Scholar
  50. —. 1999b. Downward causation and why the mental matters. CTNS Bulletin, 19/1, 13–21.Google Scholar
  51. —. 1999c. Physicalism without reductionism:Toward a scientifically, philosophically, and theologically sound portrait of human nature. Zygon, 34/4, 551–571.Google Scholar
  52. Murphy, N and Ellis, G.F. 1996. On the Moral Nature of the Universe.Google Scholar
  53. Nagel, T. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.Google Scholar
  54. Penfield, W. 1975. The Mystery of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Popper, K. and Eccles, J. 1977. The Self and its Brain. London: Routledge and Kegan, Paul.Google Scholar
  56. Poulton, E.P. 1973. Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory.The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  57. Robinson, D.M. 1982. Some thoughts on the matter of the mind/body problem, in J. Eccles (ed.), Mind and Brain. New York. Paragon, pp. 197–206.Google Scholar
  58. Robinson, H.M. 1976.The mind–body problem in contemporary philosophy. Zygon, 11, 346–60.Google Scholar
  59. Rurzyla-Smith, P., Barabasz, A., Barabasz, M., and Warner, D. 1995. Effects of hypnosis on immune response. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 38, 71–79.Google Scholar
  60. Russell, R., Murphy, N., Meyering, T., and Arbib, M.(eds.) 1999. Neuroscience and the Person. Berkeley, CA: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, G. and Beatty, J. 1977. Biofeedback Theory and Research. New York:Academic Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schwartz, J. 1999. A role for volition in the generation of new brain circuitry. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 115–142.Google Scholar
  63. Scott, A. 2004. Reductionism revisited. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, 51–68.Google Scholar
  64. Segal, Z., Williams, J., and Teasdale, J. 2002. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression. NewYork: Guilford.Google Scholar
  65. Shapiro, S., Schwartz, G., and Bonner, G. 1998. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on medical and premedical students. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 581–599.Google Scholar
  66. Sheikh, A., Kunzendorf, R., and and Sheikh, K. 1996. Somatic consequences, of consciousness, in M.Velmans (ed.), The Science of Consciousness. London: Routledge, pp. 140–180.Google Scholar
  67. Silberstein, M. 2001. Converging on emergence: Consciousness, causation, and explanation. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 61–98.Google Scholar
  68. Sperry, R.W. 1991. Search for beliefs to live by consistent with science. Zygon, 26, 237–358.Google Scholar
  69. Toulmin, S. 1960. The Philosophy of Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  70. Van Gulick, R. 1993.Who’s in charge here? Who’s doing all the work? in J. Heil and A. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 223–256.Google Scholar
  71. Velmans, M. (ed.) 1996. The Science of Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Velmans, M. 2000. Understanding Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. —. 2002. How could conscious experiences effect brains? Journal of Conscious Studies, 9, 3–29.Google Scholar
  74. Watkins, J. 1982. A basic difficulty in the mind–brain identity hypothesis, in J. Eccles (ed.), Mind and Brain. New York: Paragon, pp. 221–232.Google Scholar
  75. Wood, G. Bughi, S. Morrison, J. Tanavoli, S. and Zadeh, H. 2003. Hypnosis, differential expression cytokines by T-cell subsets, and the hypothalamo-pituitary axis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 45, 179–193.Google Scholar
  76. Woody, E. and Szechtman, H. 2000. Hypnotic hallucinations: Towards a biology of epistemology. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17, 4–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kelly Bulkeley 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James W. Jones

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations