“Substantial Branches of Learning” and “A Higher Degree of Culture”: Academic Studies and Intellectual Life

  • Christine A. Ogren

Abstract

Attending any form of “higher” education was a stretch for the types of students who populated nineteenth-century state normal schools throughout the United States; normalites’ gender, race, or families’ financial struggles in many cases prohibited them from traveling to prestigious high schools, academies, or colleges. Affordable and accessible, normal-school training for teaching was within their reach. Because many students in the latter part of the nineteenth century—like those in the previous decades—arrived with little more than a common-school education, normal-school leaders found it necessary to continue to offer instruction in academic subjects. While this situation frustrated some normal-school principals, others looked upon academic instruction as another means of producing well-prepared teachers, even as increasing numbers of normalites were high-school graduates by the turn of the twentieth century. In 1904, Principal William E. Wilson at the state normal in Ellensburg, Washington advocated educating teachers through “general scholarship and broad culture.” He explained,

Keywords

Income Respiration Beach Hull Gravel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

3 “Substantial Branches of Learning” and “A Higher Degree of Culture”: Academic Studies and Intellectual Life

  1. 1.
    Wilson quoted in Samuel R. Mohler, The First Seventy-Five Years: A History of Central Washington State College, 1891–1966 (Ellensburg, WA: Central Washington State College, 1967), 62Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    Daniel Putnam, A History of the Michigan State Normal School at Ypsilanti, Michigan, 1849–1899 (Ypsilanti, MI: Michigan State Normal College, 1899), 60–61Google Scholar
  3. 38.
    Quoted in Lawrence W. Levine, “William Shakespeare and the American People: A Study in Cultural Transformation,” in The Unpredictable Past: Explorations in American Cultural History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 39.
    Burton J. Bledstein, The Culture of Professionalism: The Middle Class and the Development of Higher Education in America (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1976), 30, 55; Levine, “William Shakespeare and the American People”;Google Scholar
  5. Richard Ohmann, Selling Culture: Magazines, Markets, and Class at the Turn of the Century (New York: Verso, 1996), 157–159;Google Scholar
  6. Paul DiMaggio, “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston: The Creation of an Organizational Base for High Culture in America,” Media, Culture and Society 4 (1982): 33–50;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Paul DiMaggio, “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston, Part II: The Classification and Framing of American Art,” Media, Culture and Society 4 (1982): 303–322;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alan Trachtenberg, The Incorporation of America: Culture & Society in the Gilded Age (New York: Hill and Wang, 1982), chapter 5;Google Scholar
  9. Oscar Handlin and Mary F. Handlin, The American College and American Culture: Socialization as a Function of Higher Education (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1970), 49–50Google Scholar
  10. See also Robert H. Wiebe, The Search for Order, 1877–1920 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1967). Jencks and Riesman distinguish between social stratification and cultural stratification, but acknowledge that the two are highly interrelatedGoogle Scholar
  11. Christopher Jencks and David Riesman, The Academic Revolution (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1968), 64–90. According to Bourdieu, cultural capital has three forms: the “embodied state” is the culture absorbed into one’s being or personality; “objectified” cultural capital is physical items such as books or paintings; and the “institutionalized” form is academic qualificationsGoogle Scholar
  12. Pierre Bourdieu, “The Forms of Capital,” in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. John G. Richardson (New York: Greenwood Press, 1986), 243–249Google Scholar
  13. See also David Swartz, Culture & Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997);Google Scholar
  14. Pierre Bourdieu and Jean-Claude Passeron, Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, translated by Richard Nice (Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications, 1977);Google Scholar
  15. Randall Collins, The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc., 1979), 57–62;Google Scholar
  16. Alejandro Portes, “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology,” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frederick Rudolph, The American College and University: A History (Athens: University of Georgia Press, [1962] 1990), 137–150; Rudolph, Curriculum, 95–98;Google Scholar
  18. Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz, Campus Life: Undergraduate Cultures from the End of the Eighteenth Century to the Present (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987), chapter 2;Google Scholar
  19. Thomas S. Harding, College Literary Societies: Their Contribution to Higher Education in the United States, 1815–1876 (New York: Pageant Press, 1976)Google Scholar
  20. 56.
    Lee Graver, A History of the First Pennsylvania State Normal School, Now the State Teachers College at Millersville (Millersville, PA: State Teachers College, 1955), 229; Bannon, “A History,” 44; Marshall, Grandest, 158Google Scholar
  21. 57.
    Brush, In Honor, 48; John W. Cook and James V. McHugh, A History of the Illinois State Normal University (Normal, IL: Illinois State Normal University, 1882), 149; Ryle, Centennial History, 444; Wright, Fifty Years, 202;Google Scholar
  22. John W. Cook and James V. McHugh, The Normal Advance 5 (March 1899): 120–123Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Christine A. Ogren 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine A. Ogren

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations