The Constitutive Components of Scientific Inquiry: Bridging the Subject/Object Dichotomy
Even though meaning (Sinn) is simultaneously a fact and a value, Weber posits that a distinction can be drawn between the two different aspects and that scientific inquiry requires an “objective” distinction between the two. This claim is itself based on the presupposition that there exists an “unconditional valid type” of knowledge by means of which this distinction can be drawn. Speaking of this presupposition, Weber notes: “This presupposition now becomes our problem in the sense that we must discuss the meaning of objectively ‘valid’ truth in the social sciences” (OSS, 63). In other words, how do we arrive at objectively valid scientific knowledge (or “truth”)? The manner in which Weber investigates and eventually resolves this question parallels and complements the manner in which he investigates and resolves the question: What does scientific inquiry investigate?
When we distinguished in principle between “value-judgment” and “empirical knowledge,” we presupposed the existence of an unconditional valid type of knowledge in the social sciences, i.e., the analytical order of empirical social reality. (OSS, 63)
KeywordsManifold Assure Posit Clarification Univer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.