Abstract
Since the adoption of mixed systems in many of the new democracies that emerged from the rubble of the Berlin Wall and in a number of countries with established democratic records, many scholars have theorized about the consequences that mixed systems exert on the configuration of national party systems. The normative judgments made by practitioners and academics alike about the “goodness” or “badness” of mixed electoral institutions have mostly been based on predictions about the kinds of party systems that these election rules should engender. Few, however, have investigated this issue cross-nationally. If mixed systems are to be judged based on their representativeness and their ability to produce cabinet stability, coherent and identifiable governing majorities, and a balance between local and national interests (Shugart and Wattenberg 2001b), no such evaluation can be complete without a thorough assessment of the kinds of legislatures they spawn.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2005 Federico Ferrara, Erik S. Herron, and Misa Nishikawa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferrara, F., Herron, E.S., Nishikawa, M. (2005). Better, Worse, or Just Different? Legislative Fractionalization in Mixed Systems. In: Mixed Electoral Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978851_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978851_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53256-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7885-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)