Abstract
That the independence and power of the Hungarian constitutional court has been called a “happy surprise” of Hungary’s negotiated transition reflects the more general assessment that pact-making in Hungary was the exception that proved an unfortunate rule: the regime usually wins pacted transitions.1 The attention, if not the emphasis, on opposition caution and regime power in the democratization literature is warranted, and explanations of pact-making dynamics must account for these less happy outcomes as well.This chapter attempts to do so by examining the other possible combinations of opposition and regime negotiators: an opposition and regime both risk-averse, a risk-averse opposition facing risk-taking softliners, and a risk-taking opposition matched by risk-taking regime softliners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2005 John W. Schiemann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schiemann, J.W. (2005). Comparative Perspectives: South Africa, Poland, and China. In: The Politics of Pact-Making. Political Evolution and Institutional Change. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978578_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978578_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53273-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7857-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)