Abstract
By the time the war in Europe ended, the United States had emerged as the principal industrial and financial power in the world political economy. Its economy accounted for more than 50 percent of all manufacturing in the world. Its banks had lent some $2 billion to the Allies between 1914 and 1917, and during the next year and a half the U.S. government extended about $7.5 billion worth of credits to them. At home, war-time government spending had stimulated the economy to the advantage of corporations and the average citizen, as the manufacturing and agricultural sectors supplied goods for domestic and foreign markets. Immediately after the war, the Wilsonian corporatist, “promotional state,” having successfully aided the Allies in securing victory, now prepared to compete against them for a greater share of the world markets and resources, a particularly pressing concern as demands for American goods in the Allied markets dropped.1 U.S.-Turkish trade relations had, with the exception of a handful of products, virtually stopped after diplomatic relations were severed in April 1917, and both nations were determined to resume their economic ties. In the meantime, various interests at home competed to shape U.S. foreign policy toward the tattered Ottoman Empire.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Kendrick A. Clements, The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1992 ), pp. 143–44, 158, 174.
Thomas, J. Knock, To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Questfor a New World Order ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992 ), pp. 194–96.
Josephus Daniels, The Navy and the Nation: War-Time Addresses ( New York: George H. Doran, 1919 ), pp. 295–301.
Gerald D. Nash, United States Oil Policy 1890–1964 (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968 ), pp. 40–41, 43–44, 45.
Gregory P. Nowell, Mercantile States and the World Oil Cartel, 1900–1939 ( Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1994 ), p. 129.
Abraham H. Hartunian, Neither to Laugh Nor to Weep: A Memoir of the Armenian Genocide ( Boston: Beacon Press, 1968 ), pp. 116–17;
Stanley E. Kerr, The Lions of Marash ( Albany: State University of New York Press, 1973 ), p. 35.
Gregory P. Nowell, Mercantile States and the World Oil Cartel 1990–1939, ( Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1994 ), pp. 126–27;
Benjamin Gerig, The Open Door and the Mandates System ( London: George Allen and Unwin, 1930 ), p. 143.
Frank M. Surface, The Grain Trade during the World War: Being a History of the Food Administration Grain Corporation and the United States Grain Corporation (New York: Macmillan, 1928), pp. 156–57; Hovannisian, Republic of Armenia vol. 2, pp. 367–72, 401.
Emily S. Rosenberg, Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930 ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999 ), p. 99.
Copyright information
© 2005 Simon Payaslian
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Payaslian, S. (2005). The Perversion of Peace. In: United States Policy toward the Armenian Question and the Armenian Genocide. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978400_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978400_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53258-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7840-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)