Hot Pursuit: Fugitives From Justice

  • Kingsley Chiedu Moghalu


The very idea of international criminal justice is predicted on a framework in which sovereign states cooperate with international criminal tribunals, giving effect to their judicial orders and providing political and financial support. This is what oils the wheels of war crimes justice. It could not be otherwise, for the Arusha and Hague tribunals have no police forces or prisons of their own. These two tribunals, created as they are by the United Nations (UN) Security Council’s enforcement powers, impose on states an obligation to cooperate with them. In the treaty-based International Criminal Court (ICC), that obligation is willingly taken on when a state signs on to the treaty regime. And for the “hybrid” courts such as the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the weak legal framework for state cooperation has had important practical consequences. That court, not having the enforcement powers of UN Security Council-created International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) under the UN Charter, cannot compel the cooperation of states. Charles Taylor, the Special Court’s most important indictee, is in exile in Nigeria, which has declined to hand him over to the Court.


United Nations Security Council International Criminal Court Rome Statute International Criminal Tribunal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 Hot Pursuit: Fugitives From Justice

  1. 1.
    Kingsley Chiedu Moghalu, “International Humanitarian Law from Nuremberg to Rome: The Weighty Precedents of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,” Pace International Law Review 14, fall 2002, 273–305.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    J.G. Starke, Introduction to International Law ( London: Butterworths, 1984 ), 68–71.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    See Dagmar Stroh, “State Cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 5 (The Hague, London, and New York: Kluwer Law International, 2001 ), 282.Google Scholar
  4. 17.
    Evan J. Wallach, “Extradition to the Rwandan War Crimes Tribunal: Is another Treaty Required?” UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 59, summer 1998.Google Scholar
  5. Sean D. Murphy, “Surrender of Indictee to International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,” American Journal of International Law 131, January 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 24.
    See Barbara Crossette, “Judge in Texas Jars UN Effort on War Crimes,” New York Times, December 30, 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 35.
    Douglass Cassel, “U.S. Cooperation with International Justice: A First Step,” commentary, April 12, 2000, Scholar
  8. 44.
    See Ian Fisher, “War Crimes in Africa: Where Justice Takes a Back Seat to Just Ending a War,” New York Times, July 15, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 55.
    See Sudarsan Raghavan, “Ten Years Later, Rwanda Still Seeking Justice ” Kansas City Star, April 2, 2002Google Scholar
  10. 70.
    Kevin J. Kelley, “Kenya Under Pressure from U.S. Over Kabuga?” Daily Nation, August 29, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 74.
    See Adam Hochschild, “The Dark Heart of Mineral Exploitation,” International Herald Tribune, December 24–26, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 83.
    Omar McDoom, “Calling the UN and the African Union,” International Herald Tribune, December 24–26, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kingsley Chiedu Moghalu 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kingsley Chiedu Moghalu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations