Indigenous versus Foreign Business Models

  • Yasheng Huang
  • Tarun Khanna

Abstract

Although there are broad similarities between China and India—two large, populous, physically contiguous, ancient, Asian civilizations that formed nation-states roughly contemporaneously—there are stark differences in their development trajectories. Equally important, there are pros and cons to the models chosen by the two countries even if one restricts the comparison to the economic domain.1

Keywords

Europe Income Expense Malaysia Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, Brian and Ann Harrison (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Instrument? Evidence from Venezuela, American Economic Review 89(3) (June): 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford, William (1995). To Steal a Book is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clissold (2005). Mr. China: A Memoir. New York: Harpercollins Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Encarnation, Dennis (1989). Dislodging Multinationals: India’s Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Farrell, Diana (2004). “Sector by Sector,” in “China and India: A Race to Growth,” McKinsey Quarterly, Special Edition, China Today.Google Scholar
  6. Hazari, R. K. (1986). “Industrial Policy in Perspective,” in Essays on Industrial Policy. New Delhi: Naurang Rai Concept Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Huang, Yasheng (2003). Selling China: Foreign Direct Investment during the Reform Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Huang, Y. (2004). Ownership Biases and FDI in China: Evidence from Two Provinces. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School.Google Scholar
  9. Huang, Y. and H. Wen (2003). A Tale of Two Provinces: Foreign Ownership and Domestic Private Sector in Jiangsu and Zhejiang. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
  10. Huang, Yasheng and Tarun Khanna (2003). “Can India Overtake China?” Foreign Policy 137 (August 31): 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, Yasheng and Wenhua Di (2003). A Tale of Two Provinces: The Institutional Environment and Foreign Ownership in China. Available at http://www.yale.edu/leitner/huang.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Huang, Y. and B. Yeung (2004). “Asean’s Institutions are Still in Poor Shape.” Financial Times. September 2.Google Scholar
  13. Huang, Y., B. Yeung, and R. Morck (2004). “ASEAN and FTAA: External Threats and Internal Institutional Weaknesses.” Business and Politics 6 (1).Google Scholar
  14. Isaacs, Harold. (1958). Scratches on Our Mind: American Views of China and India. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Khanna, Tarun (2004). “India’s Entrepreneurial Advantage,” in “China and India: A Race to Growth,” McKinsey Quarterly, Special Edition, China Today.Google Scholar
  16. Khanna, Tarun and Krishna Palepu (2002). “Emerging Giants: Building World–Class Companies in Emerging Markets,” Harvard Business School Publishing Case #9–703–431.Google Scholar
  17. Khanna, Tarun and Krishna Palepu (2005). “The Evolution of Concentrated Ownership in India: Broad Patterns and a History of the Indian Software Industry,” in Randall Morck (ed.), The History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mann, James (1997). Beijing Jeep: A Case Study of Western Business in China. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Rawski, T. G. (2001). “Will Investment Behavior Constrain China’s Growth?” China Perspectives 38: 28–35.Google Scholar
  20. Sen, Amartya (2000). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward Friedman and Bruce Gilley 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasheng Huang
  • Tarun Khanna

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations