Abstract
Although there are broad similarities between China and India—two large, populous, physically contiguous, ancient, Asian civilizations that formed nation-states roughly contemporaneously—there are stark differences in their development trajectories. Equally important, there are pros and cons to the models chosen by the two countries even if one restricts the comparison to the economic domain.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aitken, Brian and Ann Harrison (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Instrument? Evidence from Venezuela, American Economic Review 89(3) (June): 605–618.
Alford, William (1995). To Steal a Book is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Clissold (2005). Mr. China: A Memoir. New York: Harpercollins Publishers, Inc.
Encarnation, Dennis (1989). Dislodging Multinationals: India’s Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Farrell, Diana (2004). “Sector by Sector,” in “China and India: A Race to Growth,” McKinsey Quarterly, Special Edition, China Today.
Hazari, R. K. (1986). “Industrial Policy in Perspective,” in Essays on Industrial Policy. New Delhi: Naurang Rai Concept Publishing Company.
Huang, Yasheng (2003). Selling China: Foreign Direct Investment during the Reform Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, Y. (2004). Ownership Biases and FDI in China: Evidence from Two Provinces. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School.
Huang, Y. and H. Wen (2003). A Tale of Two Provinces: Foreign Ownership and Domestic Private Sector in Jiangsu and Zhejiang. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management.
Huang, Yasheng and Tarun Khanna (2003). “Can India Overtake China?” Foreign Policy 137 (August 31): 74–81.
Huang, Yasheng and Wenhua Di (2003). A Tale of Two Provinces: The Institutional Environment and Foreign Ownership in China. Available at http://www.yale.edu/leitner/huang.pdf.
Huang, Y. and B. Yeung (2004). “Asean’s Institutions are Still in Poor Shape.” Financial Times. September 2.
Huang, Y., B. Yeung, and R. Morck (2004). “ASEAN and FTAA: External Threats and Internal Institutional Weaknesses.” Business and Politics 6 (1).
Isaacs, Harold. (1958). Scratches on Our Mind: American Views of China and India. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc.
Khanna, Tarun (2004). “India’s Entrepreneurial Advantage,” in “China and India: A Race to Growth,” McKinsey Quarterly, Special Edition, China Today.
Khanna, Tarun and Krishna Palepu (2002). “Emerging Giants: Building World–Class Companies in Emerging Markets,” Harvard Business School Publishing Case #9–703–431.
Khanna, Tarun and Krishna Palepu (2005). “The Evolution of Concentrated Ownership in India: Broad Patterns and a History of the Indian Software Industry,” in Randall Morck (ed.), The History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mann, James (1997). Beijing Jeep: A Case Study of Western Business in China. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Rawski, T. G. (2001). “Will Investment Behavior Constrain China’s Growth?” China Perspectives 38: 28–35.
Sen, Amartya (2000). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Edward Friedman and Bruce Gilley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huang, Y., Khanna, T. (2005). Indigenous versus Foreign Business Models. In: Friedman, E., Gilley, B. (eds) Asia’s Giants. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978295_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403978295_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-60616-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-7829-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)