The Political Basis of Decentralization

  • Aseema Sinha

Abstract

A pervasive “China Envy” dominates public debates in India; India is mostly compared unfavorably to China. Most comparisons contrast China’s double-digit growth and high Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) levels with India’s slower growth rate and much lower FDI levels. This contrast is usually attributed to democracy in India, which, it is argued, has negative costs for economic performance.1 In addition, it is believed that decentralization in China has facilitated its economic success. India’s centralized system (“insufficient decentralization”) creates obstacles to economic reform. According to Percy Barnevik, a former chairman and chief executive of Asea Brown Boveri (ABB):

Maybe India would be served well by deeper decentralization. That could make things move faster … a lot of economic decisions can be handled locally. And then the Andhra Pradesh guy can talk to the Kerala guy and benchmark-why are they getting more than us? What are they doing that we are not doing? [In China] except certain strategic issues like police, foreign policy etc. the local guys are in charge. And they move. And growth is tremendous. That’s not through Beijing but in spite of Beijing.2

Keywords

Economic Crisis Lution Arena Rosen Argentina 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Primary Sources

  1. The Hindu, April 2, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. The Hindu, February 23, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. The Telegraph, December—January 1999.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Bajpai, Nirupam and Nandita Dasgupta (2004). What Constitutes Foreign Direct Investment? Comparison of India and China. CGSD Working Paper, No. 1, January, Center on Globalization and Sustainable Development, The Earth Institute at Columbia University.Google Scholar
  2. Bednar, J., W. Eskridge, and J. Ferejohn (2001). “A Political Theory of Federalism,” in John Ferejohn, Jack N. Rakove, and Jonathan Riley (eds.), Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bhalla, A. S. (1995). “Recent Economic Reforms in China and India.” Asian Survey 35(6) (June): 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bramall, Chris (2000). The Sources of Chinese Economic Growth, 1978–1996. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chhibber, Pradeep and Samuel Eldersveld (2000). “Local Elites and Popular Support for Economic Reform in India and China.” Comparative Political Studies 33 (2): 350–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung, Jae Ho (2000). Central Control and Local Discretion in China: Leadership and Implementation During Post-Mao Decollectivization. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Editorial. 1998. “Who’s Afraid of Art. 356.” Frontline 15(14) July 4–17.Google Scholar
  8. Echeverri-Gent, John (2002). “Politics in India’s Decentered Polity,” in Alyssa Ayres and Philip Oldenburg (eds.), India Briefing: Quickening the Pace of Change. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  9. Freidman, Edward (1998). “Development, Revolution, Democracy, and Dictatorship: China Versus India?” in T. Skapol (ed.), Democracy, Revolution and History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gallager, Mary (2002). “ ‘Reform and Openness’: Why China’s Economic Reforms have Delayed Democracy.” World Politics 54(3) (April): 338–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganapati, Priya (2002). “India’s FDI Flow almost at Par with China.” India Abroad, June 21.Google Scholar
  12. Garman, C., S. Haggard, and E. Willis (2001). “Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases.” World Politics 53 (January): 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, Yasheng (1996). Inflation and Investment Controls in China: The Political Economy of Central-Local Relations during the Reform Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchcroft, Paul (2001). “Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power.” Governance 14(1) (January): 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Interview. Economic Times (India) December 12, 1997, New Delhi Edition.Google Scholar
  16. Jenkins, Rob (1999). Democratic Politics and Economic Reform in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Krugman, Paul and M. Obstfeld (1997). International Economics: Theory and Policy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, Pak K. (2000). “Into the Trap of Strengthening State Capacity: China’s Tax-Assignment Reform.” The China Quarterly 164 (December): 1007–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, Cheng (2002). “After Hu, Who?—China’ Provincial Leaders Await Promotion.” China Leadership Monitor 1 (Winter): 1–14.Google Scholar
  20. Lohmann, Susanne (1997). “Linkage Politics.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1) (February): 38–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maddison, Angus (1998). Chinese Economic Performance in the Long Run. Paris: Development Centre of the OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCarten, W. J. (2003). “The Challenge of Fiscal Discipline in the Indian States,” in Jonathan Rodden, Gunnar S. Eskeland, and Jennie Litvack (eds.), Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Musgrave, Richard A. and Peggy Musgrave (1973). Public Finance in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Oi, Jean (1999). Rural China Takes Off: The Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ordershook, Peter C. and Olga Shvetsova (1997). “Federalism and Constitutional Design.” Journal of Democracy 8(1) (January): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ordershook, Peter (1996). “Russia’s Party System: Is Russia Federalism Viable?” Post-Soviet Affairs 12(3) (July-September): 195–217.Google Scholar
  27. Parikh, Sunita and Barry R. Weingast (1997). “A Comparative Theory of Federalism: India.” Virginia Law Review 83(7) (October): 1593–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Putnam, Robert (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization 42 (Summer): 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rao, M. Govinda (2000). “Fiscal Adjustment and the Role of State Governments in India,” in S. Kahkonen and A. Lanyi (eds.), Institutions, Incentives and Economic Reforms in India. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Rawski, Thomas (2001a). “What’s Happening to China’s GDP Statistics?” China Economic Review 12(4) (December): 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rawski, Thomas (2001b). “China’s Reform Watch: Turning Point Looming.” China Perspectives 38: 28–35.Google Scholar
  32. Rawski, Thomas (2001c). “China’s GDP Statistics-A Case of Caveat Lector?” available at: http://www.pitt.edu/-tgrawski/ Google Scholar
  33. Rawski, Thomas (2002). “Measuring China’s Recent GDP growth: Where Do We Stand?” China Economic Quarterly 2(1) (October).Google Scholar
  34. Ren, R. E. (1997). China’s Economic Performance in an International Perspective. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  35. Rose-Ackerman, Susan and Jonathan Rodden (1997). “Does Federalism Preserve Markets.” Virginia Law Review 83(7) (October): 1521–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosen, George (1990). “India and China: Perspectives on Contrasting Styles of Economics Reform.” Journal of Asian Economics 1(2) (Autumn): 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rudolph, L. and S. Rudolph (2001). “The Iconisation of Chandrababu: Sharing Sovereignty in India Federal Market Economy.” Economic and Political Weekly (May 5): 1541–1567.Google Scholar
  38. Saez, Lawrence (2000). Globalization and Market-Preserving Federalism: Evidence from China and India. Conference paper presented at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the APSA, Washington, D.C., August 31—September 4.Google Scholar
  39. Saez, Lawrence (2002). Federalism Without a Center: The Impact of Political and Economic Reform on India’s Federal System. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Sachs, J. and W. T. Woo (1997). “Chinese Economic Growth,” in Joint Economic Committee (1997): China’s Economic Future. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress.Google Scholar
  41. Shirk, Susan L. (1993). The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Shaoguang, Wang and Hu Angang (1999). The Political Economy of Uneven Development: The Case of China. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  43. Sinha, Aseema (2004). “The Changing Political Economy of Federalism in India: A Historical Institutionalist Approach.” India Review 3(1) (January): 25–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sinha, Aseema (2005). The Regional Roots of Developmental Politics in India: A Leviathan Divided. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Solnick, Steven (1996). “The Breakdown of Hierarchies in the Soviet Union and China: A Neo-Institutionalist Perspective.” World Politics 48 (January): 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stepan, Al (2001). Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Stigler, G. ( 1957 [1998]). “The Tenable Range of Functions of Local Government.” Reprinted in Wallace Oates (ed.), The Economics of Fiscal Federalism and Local Finance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgard.Google Scholar
  48. Tiebout, Charles (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64(5) (October): 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsai, Kellee S. (2004). “Off Balance: The Unintended Consequences of Fiscal Federalism in China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 9(2) (Fall): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsebelis, George (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Weingast, Barry (1995). “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11(1) (April): 1–31.Google Scholar
  52. Weingast, Barry R. (2002). “Rational Choice Institutionalism,” in Ira Katznelson and Helen U. Milner (eds.), Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  53. Whiting, Susan H. (2001). Power and Wealth in Rural China: The Political Economy of Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wong, C. (1992). “Fiscal Reform and Local Industrialization: the Problematic Sequencing of Reform in Post-Mao China.” Modern China 18(2) (April): 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang, Dali L. (1991). “China Adjusts to the World Economy: The Political Economy of China’s Coastal Development Strategy.” Pacific Affairs 64(1) (Spring): 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yang, Dali. Y. (1997). Beyond Beijing: Liberalization and the Regions in China. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward Friedman and Bruce Gilley 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aseema Sinha

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations