India’s Reform Strengths

  • James Manor


Why does China receive so much more international attention than India? China is the world’s most populous nation, but the gap is shrinking. For a long time, China’s economy was growing much faster than India’s, but that gap too has closed substantially. In recent years, China has received vastly more foreign direct investment (FDI) than India, but India does almost as well with nonethnic Chinese investors. Indian imports still lag behind China’s, but have begun to increase as China’s did after the first few years of its economic reforms. While China struggles with political liberalization and decentralization, India has long had a resilient democracy, a federal system and—since 1993—a somewhat more decentralized political system. This chapter explains why India was taken less seriously by the outside world and why that situation has begun to change.


Foreign Direct Investment Gross Domestic Product Foreign Policy Economic Reform Asian Financial Crisis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Crook, Richard, C. and James Manor (1994). Enhancing Participation and Institutional Performance: Democratic Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa. London: Overseas Development Administration.Google Scholar
  2. Dhar, P. N. (1987). “The Political Economy of Development in India.” The Indian Economic Review, January-June.Google Scholar
  3. Gaddis, J. L. (1997). We Now Know. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press and Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  4. Gupta, Shekhar (1995). India Redefines Its Role, Adelphi paper 293. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the IISS.Google Scholar
  5. Manor, James (1994). “The Political Sustainability of Economic Liberalization”, in Robert H. Gassen and Vijay Joshi (eds.), India: The Future of Economic Reform. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 341–363.Google Scholar
  6. Manor, James (1996a). “ ‘Ethnicity’ and Politics in India.” International Affairs 72(3) (July): 459–476.Google Scholar
  7. Manor, James (1996b). “Political Regeneration in India,” in D. L. Sheth and Ashis Nandy (eds.), The Multiverse of Democracy: Essays in Honour of Rajni Kothari. New Delhi and London: Sage Publications and Thousand Oaks, pp. 230–241.Google Scholar
  8. Manor, James (1998). The Political Economy of Decentralization. Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Manor, James (2000). “Small-Time Political Fixers in State Politics in India: ‘Towel over Armpit,’ ” Asian Survey (September-October): 816–835.Google Scholar
  10. Manor, James (2002). “Changing State, Changing Society.” South Asia (August): 231–256.Google Scholar
  11. Sidhu, Waheguru Pal Singh (1997). Enhancing Indo-US Strategic Cooperation, Adelphi Paper 313. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the IISS.Google Scholar
  12. Yadav, Yogendra (1997). “Reconfiguration in Indian Politics: State Assembly Elections, 1993–1995,” Economic and Political Weekly, 31(2–3) (January 1996): 2, 133–143, reprinted in Partha Chatterjee (ed.), State and Politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 177–208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward Friedman and Bruce Gilley 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Manor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations