Advertisement

Chasing China: Can India Bridge the Gap?

  • Subramanian Swamy

Abstract

In the 1960s and 1970s, Indians were told how much better the Chinese authoritarian system was doing than India. There was no poverty, inflation, or unemployment in China. China was growing at 8 percent per year while India was stuck with the Hindu rate of 3.5 percent. This was because we were not socialist the way China was.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Capita Income Foreign Direct Investment Inflow Foreign Exchange Reserve Soft Budget Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sachs, Jeffrey et al. (1997). Economic Reforms in China and India: Selected Issues in Industrial Policy. Harvard Institute for International Development, Discussion Paper, No. 580.Google Scholar
  2. Samuelson, Paul A. and Subramanian Swamy (1974). “Invariant Economic Index Numbers and Canonical Duality.” The American Economic Review LXIV (4): 566–593.Google Scholar
  3. Swamy, Subramanian (1984). “Samuelson’s Analytical Notes on International Real Income Measures.” The Economic Journal 94: 265–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Swamy, Subramanian (2003). Economic Reforms and Performance: China and India in Comparative Perspective. Delhi: Konark Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Zhang, Z., Liu, A., and Yao, S. (2001). “Convergence of China’s Regional Incomes 1952–97.” China Economic Review 12 (2/3): 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Edward Friedman and Bruce Gilley 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subramanian Swamy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations