Asia’s Giants: Comparing China and India contains many illuminating approaches to the subject of the title, especially focusing on the binary of authoritarianism versus democracy. In comparisons between various aspects of the development of these two mega-nations since the late 1940s, the chapters tend to make the case that, contrary to received wisdom, India’s record compares quite well with China’s, and in some instances surpasses it. Rather than preview those issues, in this introduction I seek to draw attention to some interesting coincidences and, more significantly, differences in the political development of the two countries, in particular, how their institutions are able to handle potential crises. I conclude that in two key arenas, handling succession and dealing with society, India has built better than China.
KeywordsDust Stein Arena Reformer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brass, Paul R. (1997). The Theft of an Idol: Text and Context in the Representation of Collective Violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Harrison, Selig S. (1960). India, The Most Dangerous Decades. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Kahn, Joseph (2004). “China’s Elite Learn to Flaunt It while the New Landless Weep.” New York Times, December 25, p. Al.Google Scholar
- Kothari, Rajni (1970). India. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- Pandey, B. N. (1976). Nehru. New York: Stein & Day.Google Scholar
- Tambiah, Stanley J. (1996). Leveling Crowds: Ethnonationalist Conflicts and Collective Violence in South Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Teiwes, Frederick C. (1990). Politics at Mao’s Court: Gao Gang and Party Factionalism in the Early 1950s. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Varshney, Ashutosh (2002). Ethnic Violence and Civic Life: Hindus and Moslems in India, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar