Cultural Perspectives on Science and Technology Education

  • Meshach B. Ogunniyi

Abstract

Many reasons have been adduced as to why a society should be scientifically and technologically literate. Among others, it is believed that a scientifically/technologically literate society would be able to: (1) compete successfully in a world that is dominated by science and technology; (2) formulate rational policies and make informed decisions on local, national, and international issues requiring some knowledge of science and technology; (3) use their scientific/technological knowledge and skills to solve practical social problems as well as improve the quality of life of that society; (4) cope with, or adapt to rapid changes brought about by science and technology and (5) appreciate the role of science and technology not only as a vehicle for socioeconomic development but also as a means to achieve cultural revolution.

Keywords

Expense Logical Positivism Nigeria Indonesia Lewin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, U.B. (1989). The cultural content in Nigerian education: The language curriculum. In P.P. Ekeh and G. Ashiwaju (Eds.), Nigeria since independence— the first 25 years (pp. 32–57) Ibadan: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G.S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G.S. and Jegede, O.J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Science in Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2000). Recovering scientific literacy as agential literacy. In R. Reid and S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing science plus culture (pp. 211–247). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bude, U. and Lewin, K. (1997). Improving test design. Bonn: Education, Science and Documentation Centre (ZED).Google Scholar
  6. Chaytor, D.E.B. (1980). Shaping science educators in the eighties. In E.I. Alonge (Ed.), Proceedings of Inaugural Conference of All-African Association of Science Teachers (Lagos).Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dugger, W.E. (1968). Technology-the discipline. A paper presented to the PATT conference. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Dyrenfurth, M.J. (1984). Literacy for a technological world. Information Series, no. 266, Columbus, Ohio. The National Center for Research in Vocational Education, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Ekeh, P.P. (1989). The scope of culture in Nigeria. In P.P. Ekeh and G. Ashiwaju (Eds.), Nigeria since independence—the first 25 years (pp. 1–16) Ibadan: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  11. Forum of African Science Educators (1982). Report of First International FASE Conference, Harare (Zimbabwe).Google Scholar
  12. Foundation for Research Development (1996). Public understanding of science. In science and technological indicators chapter 6, pp. 149–169. FRD: Pretoria.Google Scholar
  13. Galal, E.E. (1989). Development cooperation in science and technology. Changing contexts and emerging concerns. Proceedings of the Interregional Meeting on International Cooperation in Science and Technology for Development, Feldafing, Federal Republic of Germany, 23–25.Google Scholar
  14. Good, R. and Shymansky, J. (2001). Nature-of-science literacy in benchmarks and standards: Post-modern/relativist or modern/realist. In F. Bevilacqua, E. Giannetto and M.R. Mathews (Eds.), Science education and culture (pp. 53–65). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunstone, R. and White, R. (2000). Goals, methods and achievements of research in science education. In R. Millar, J. Leach and J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 293–307). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jegede, O.J. and Okebukola, P.A.O. (1991). The effect of instruction on sociocultural beliefs hindering the learning of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jansen, J. (1997). Ten reasons why OBE will fail. A Monograph, Faculty of Education, University of Durban-Westville.Google Scholar
  18. Jansen, J. and Chritie, P. (1999). Changing curriculum: Studies on outcomesbased education in South Africa. Kenwyn: Juta.Google Scholar
  19. Julie, C. (1997). Sinking school OBE mathematics to save it: Mathematical literacy, mathematics and mathematical science. In M.B. Ogunniyi (Ed.), Curriculum 2005: A panacea or a pandora’s box? Seminar Series, University of the Western Cape, 1 (2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Kasanda, C.D., Njabili, A.F. and Otaala, B. (1996). Improving student performance on the IGCSE examinations. Windhoek: University of Namibia.Google Scholar
  21. Khan, M. and Rollnick, M. (1993). Science education in the new South Africa: Reflections and visions. International Journal of Science Education, 15 (3), 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacDonald, B. and Walker, R. (1976). Changing the curriculum. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
  23. Makgothi, S. and Lelliot, A.D. (1992). Curriculum and teaching methods. In U. Kann and M. Nganunu (Eds.), Science education in academic secondary schools in Botswana. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  24. McComas, W.F. (2000). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Mwamadzingo, M. (1993). The interface of science and technology with industry and government of Kenya. Research and development forum for science-led development in Africa. Nairobi: Randforum Press.Google Scholar
  26. Prophet, R.B. and Rowell, P.M. (1993). Coping and control: Science teaching strategies in Botswana. Qualitative Studies in Education, 63 (3), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ogunniyi, M.B. (1978). Determinants of successful implementation of the integrated science programme in Nigeria. Journal of the Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 16 (2), 50–58.Google Scholar
  28. Ogunniyi, M.B. (1986). Two decades of science education in Africa. Science Education, 70 (2), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogunniyi, M.B. (1991). Scientific and technological literacy in Africa: The Nigerian experience. A research report submitted to the Ministry of Education, Lagos, Nigeria.Google Scholar
  30. Ogunniyi, M.B. (1995). Race, culture, evolution and traditional worldviews: Challenges for science education in Africa. Inaugural Lecture, University of the Western Cape. Series A No. 69.Google Scholar
  31. Ogunniyi, M.B. (1996). Science, technology and mathematics: The problem of developing critical human capital in Africa. International Journal of Science Education, 18 (3), 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ogunniyi, M.B. (Ed.) (1997). Curriculum 2005: A panacea or a pandora’s box? Seminar Series, University of the Western Cape, 1 (2), pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
  33. Ogunniyi, M.B. (Ed.) (1999). Assessment of grades 7–9 pupils’ knowledge and interest in science and technology. Report of the Scientific and Technological Project submitted to the National Research Foundation, South Africa.Google Scholar
  34. Ogunniyi, M.B. (2000). Teachers’ and pupils’ scientific and indigenous knowledge of natural phenomena. Journal of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4 (1), 70–77.Google Scholar
  35. Ogunniyi, M.B., Jegede, O.J., Ogawa, M., Yandila, C.D. and Oladele, F.K. (1995). Nature of worldview presuppositions among science teachers in Botswana, Indonesia, Japan, Nigeria, & the Philippines. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (8), 817–831.Google Scholar
  36. Ogunniyi, M.B. and Taale, K.D. (2004). Relative effects of a remedial instruction on grade seven learners’ conceptions of heat, magnetism and electricity. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8, 77–87.Google Scholar
  37. Rogan, J.M. (2001). Comments on the national curriculum statements. The natural sciences. On behalf of the Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, University of Pretoria.Google Scholar
  38. Rollnick, M.S. (1998). The influence of language on the second language teaching and learning. In W.W. Cobern, Socio-cultural perspectives on science education: An international dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Rollnick, M.S. and Rutherford, M. (1996). The use of mother tongue and English in the learning and expression of science concepts: A classroom based study. International Journal of Science Education, 18 (1), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Searle, J. (1984). Minds, brains and science. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  41. Sjoberg, S. (2000). Interesting all children in “science for all.” In R. Millar, J. Leach and J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 165–186). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Solano-Flores, G. and Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (5), 533–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (1996).Google Scholar
  44. Ware, S.A. (1992). Secondary school science in developing countries: Status and issues. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. Yoloye, E.A. (1998). Historical perspectives and their relevance to present and future practice. In P. Naidoo and M. Savage (1998), African science and technology education into the new millennium: Practice, policy and priorities (pp. 1–22). Kenwyn: Juta.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ali A. Abdi and Ailie Cleghorn 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meshach B. Ogunniyi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations