Skip to main content

Sovereignty of States and Similar Entities: A Conceptual Analysis

  • Chapter
  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

What does sovereignty as a descriptive concept refer to at the level of states and similar entities? Since, in epistemological terms, any concept may refer to any phenomenon at any level, the first step in the analysis must be a certain modification of this question: what does sovereignty, or more precisely, terms like “state sovereignty,” “sovereign statehood,” or “sovereignty of states and similar entities”1 reasonably refer to when employed as a nonnormative, analytical tool at the level of states and similar entities? To introduce reason in this fashion opens the way for an attempt to apply a loosely defined set of criteria, such as analytical utility generated by a high degree of precision, logical coherence, consistency with previous usage, and relative imperviousness to rhetorical abuse, to an apparently fruitless discussion. To speak about nonnormative, analytical tools, on the other hand, delimits the analysis to the sources of actual and potential controversies to be found in those scientific disciplines that endeavor to understand the referent of the concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Kenneth N. Waltz, “Political Structures,” in Robert O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986) p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barry Buzan, People State and Fear—The National Security Problem in International Relations (London: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd., 1983) pp.40, 41, and 94.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alan James, Sovereign Statehood—The Basis of International Society (London: Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltd., 1986) p.6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ian Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, Fourth edition, 1990) p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stefan Talmon, Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hans Kelsen, “Sovereignty and International Law,” in Wladyslaw Jozef Stankiewicz (ed.), In Defence of Sovereignty (London: Oxford University Press, 1969) p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  8. James Leslie Brierly, The Law of Nations An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, edited by Sir Humphrey Waldock (Oxford: Clarendon Press, Sixth edition, 1963) p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lassa Oppenheim, International Law-A Treatise, edited by H. Lauterpacht (London, New York, and Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co., Eighth edition, 1955) p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alan James, Sovereign Statehood—The Basis of International Society (London: Allen & Unwin Publishers Ltd., 1986) p.25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Robert H. Jackson, “Continuity and Change in the State System,” in Robert H. Jackson and Alan James (eds.), States in a Changing World—A Contemporary Analysis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) p. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul Taylor, “The United Nations in the 1990s: Proactive Cosmopolitanism and the Issue of Sovereignty,” in Robert Jackson (ed.), Political Studies—Sovereignty at the Millennium (Vol. 47, No. 3 Special Issue 1999) p. 538.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations—The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1949) pp.259, 261, and 263.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raymond Aron, Peace and War-A Theory of International Relations, translated by Richard Howard and Annette Baker Fox (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966) pp. 745–746.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carl Schmitt, Political Theology—Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, translated by George Schwab (Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, The MIT Press, 1985) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also Robert O. Keohane, “Hobbes’s Dilemma and Institutional Change in World Politics: Sovereignty in International Society,” in Hans-Henrik Holm and Georg Sorensen (eds.), Whose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War (Boulder, San Francisco, and Oxford: Westview Press, 1995) p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Charles Burton Marshall, The Exercise of Sovereignty: Papers on Foreign Policy (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1965) pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Addison: Wesley Publishing Company, 1979) p. 96.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981) p. 17.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Georg Schwarzenberger, A Manual of International Law (Abingdon: Professional Books Ltd., Sixth edition, 1976) p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. David Held, Political Theory and the Modern State-Essays on State, Power and Democracy (Oxford: Polity Press, 1989) pp. 228–229.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and The Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990) pp.27 and 29.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See also Georg Schwarzenberger, “The Forms of Sovereignty,” in W1adyslaw Jozef Stankiewicz (ed.), In Defence of Sovereignty (London, New York, and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1969) pp.165–168; see also Schwarzenberger, A Manual of International Law, pp.53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society -A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan Press Ltd., Second edition, 1995) p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See also Stephen D. Krasner, “Economic Interdependence and Independent Statehood,” in Robert H. Jackson and Alan James (eds.), States in a Changing World-A Contemporary Analysis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) pp. 301–302.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stephen D. Krasner, Sovereignty-Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1999) p.9 and passim.

    Google Scholar 

  27. W. E. Hall, A Treatise on International Law, edited by Pearce Higgins (Oxford: Clarendon Press, Eighth edition, 1924) p. 605.

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Cuellar quoted in Thomas M. Franck, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cf. Harold Laski, A Grammar of Politics (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, Fifth edition, 1967) pp. 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cf. K. W. B. Middleton, “Sovereignty in Theory and Practice,” in Wladyslaw Jozef Stankiewicz (ed.) In Defence of Sovereignty (New York, London and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1969) p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ingrid Detter De Lupis, International Law and the Independent State (Aldershot, Vermont: Gower Publishing Company Limited, Second edition, 1987) pp. ix-x.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cf. David Easton, A Framework for Political Analysis (London and Sydney: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1965) p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  33. David Easton, The Political System An Inquiry into the State of Political Science (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967) pp. 135–137.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jean Bodin, Six Books of the Commonwealth, abridged and translated by M. J. Tooley (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1955) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See Robert Alan Dahl, “Power as the Control of Behaviour,” in Steven Lukes (ed.), Power (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1986) pp.39 and 40.

    Google Scholar 

  36. William Edward Hall, A Treatise on International Law edited by A. Pearce Higgins (Oxford: Clarendon Press, Eighth edition, 1924) p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Georg Schwarzenberger, “The Forms of Sovereignty,” in Wladyslaw Jozef Stankiewicz (ed.), In Defence of Sovereignty (London, New York, and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1969) p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  38. K. C. Wheare, Federal Government (London, New York, and Toronto: Oxford University Press, Fourth edition, 1963) p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Italics are added. K. W. B. Middleton, “Sovereignty in Theory and Practice,” in Wladyslaw Jozef Stankiewicz (ed.), In Defence of Sovereignty (London, New York, and Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1969) pp. 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cf. Janice E. Thomson, “State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research,” International Studies Quarterly (Vol. 39, No. 2 1995) p. 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. See John Gerard Ruggie, “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity-Toward a Neorealist Synthesis,” World Politics (Vol. 35 1983) pp. 274–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Ersun N. Kurtulus

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kurtulus, E.N. (2005). Sovereignty of States and Similar Entities: A Conceptual Analysis. In: State Sovereignty. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403977083_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics