Advertisement

The Case for Women’s Health Research in the United States: Grassroots Efforts, Legislative Change, and Scientific Development

  • Carolyn M. Mazure
Chapter

Abstract

A critical factor in improving the health and health care of all individuals is the development of new scientific knowledge that can be incorporated into clinical and personal practice. Yet, such knowledge referable specifically to women has been in short supply because, historically, women have not been included as full participants in clinical research trials.1 Furthermore, when women have been included in clinical research trials, studies have not traditionally examined whether there were differences between women and men in study outcomes.2 This situation has generated tremendous limits in our understanding of the health of women, and of gender-specific aspects of health and disease.

Keywords

Gender Perspective Clinical Research Trial General Account Office Public Health Science General Account Office Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    T. L. Johnson and E. Fee (1997), Women’s health research: An historical perspective, in F. P. Haseltine, ed., Women’s Health Research: A Medical and Policy Primer, Washington, DC: Health Press International.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. LaRosa (1995), Including women and minorities in clinical research, Applied Clinical Trials 4(5): 31–38.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    C. J. L. Murray and A. D. Lopez, eds. (1996), The Global Burden of Disease,World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    V. Vaccarino, L. Parsons, N. R. Every, H. V. Barron, H. M. Krumholz (1999), Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction, New England Journal of Medicine 341(4): 217–225; V. Vaccarino, H. M. Krumholtz, J. Yarzebski, J. M. Gore, and R.J. Goldberg (2001), Sex differences in 2-year mortality after hospital discharge for myocardial infarction, Annals of Internal Medicine 134(3): 173–181.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    M. M. Weissman and M. Olfson (1995), Depression in women: Implications for health care research, Science 269: 799–801; S. I. Wolk and M. M. Weismann (1995), Women and depression: An update, in J. M. Oldham and M. B. Riba, eds., Review of Psychiatry 14 (pp. 227–259), Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    C. M. Mazure, G. P. Keita, and Blehar, eds. (2002), Summit on Women and Depression: Proceedings and Recommendations, American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    C. M. Mazure, A. Arons, and A. Vitali (2001), Examining structured representation and designated fiscal support for women’s health in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources, Journal of Women’s Health 10(9): 849–860.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    U.S. General Accounting Office (June 18, 1990), Testimony of Mark V. Nadel, Associate Director of National and Public Health Issues, Human Resources Division before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment, U.S. House of Representatives, National Institutes of Health: Problems in implementing policy on women in study populations.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    C. D. DeAngelis and M. A. Winker (2001), Women’s health—Filling the gaps, Journal of the American Medical Association 285(11): 1508–1509. 14. J. C. Anthony, A. M. Aria, and E. O. Johnson (1995), Epidemiological and public health issues for tobacco, alcohol and other drugs, in J. M. Oldham and M. B. Riba, eds., Review of Psychiatry 14 (pp. 15–50), Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (SAMSHA) (1995), Preliminary estimates from the 1994 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, Advance Report No. 10.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    T. R. Kosten, B. J. Rounsaville, and H. D. Kleber (1989), Sex and ethnic differences in psychopathology of opiate addicts, International Journal of the Addictions 20(8): 1143–1162; M. L. Griffin, R. D. Weiss, S. M. Mirin, and U. Lange (1989), A comparison of male and female cocaine abusers, Archives of General Psychiatry 46: 122–126; E. F. McCance-Katz, K. M. Carroll, B. J. Rounsaville (1999), Gender differences in treatment-seeking cocaine abusers-implications for treatment and prognosis, American Journal on Addictions 8: 300–311; S. F. Greenfield, S. G. Manwani, and J. E. Nargiso, (2003), Epidemiology of substance use disorders in women, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 30: 413–446; C. A. Hernandez-Avila, B. J. Rounsaville, and H. R. Kranzler (2004), Opioid-, cannabis- and alcohol-dependent women show more rapid progression to substance abuse treatment, Drug & Alcohol Dependence 74: 265–272.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    S. S. Luthar and K. Walsh (1995), Treatment needs of drug-addicted mothers: Integrated parenting psychotherapy interventions, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 12: 341–348; T. J. McMahon, and S. S. Luthar (1998), Bridging the gap for children as their parents enter substance abuse treatment, in R. L. Hampton, V. Senatore, and T.P. Gullota, eds., Bridging the Fields of Substance Abuse and Child Welfare, Volume 7: Issues in children’s and families’ lives (pp. 143–187), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    C. G. Husten, J. H. Chrismon, and M. N. Reddy (1996), Trends and effects of cigarette smoking among girls and women in the United States, 1965–1993, Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association 11–17; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Women and Smoking: A Report from the Surgeon General (2001).Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    J. E. Buring (2000), Women in clinical trials—A portfolio for success, The New England Journal of Medicine 343(7): 505–506.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    United States General Accounting Office (2000), NIH has Increased Its Efforts to Include Women in Research, GAO/HEHS-00–96.Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    C. M. Mazure, Life stressors as risk factors in depression, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 5(3): 291–313.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    P. K. Maciejewski, H. G. Prigerson, and C. M. Mazure (2001), Sex differences in event-related risk for major depression, Psychological Medicine 31: 593–602.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    C. M. Mazure, M. Espeland, P. Douglas, V. Champion, and M. Killien (2000), Multidisciplinary women’s health research: The national centers of excellence in women’s health, Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine 9(7): 717–724.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    C. J. L. Murray and A. D Lopez (1996) eds., The Global Burden of Disease, pp 1–38.Google Scholar
  20. 27.
    Institute of Medicine (2001), Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? Mary-Lou Pardue, Chair, IOM Committee.Google Scholar
  21. 1.
    Council of Europe, ed. (1998), Gender Mainstreaming—Konzeptueller Rahmen, Methodologie und Beschreibung bewaehrter Praktiken, Schlußbericht über die Taetigkeit der Group of Specialists on Mainstreaming (EG-S-MS) (98)2.Google Scholar
  22. 2.
    Die Bundesregierung (2002), Gender Mainstreaming: Was ist das? Bonn: Bundesministerium fuer Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. www. gender-mainstreaming.net.Google Scholar
  23. 5.
    I. Kickbusch (1981), Die Frauengesundheitsbewegung—ein Forschungsgegenstand? in U. Schneider, ed., Was macht Frauen krank? Ansaetze zu einer frauenspezifischen Gesundheitsforschung, Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  24. 6.
    U. Schneider ed. (1981), Was macht Frauen krank? Ansaetze zu einer frauenspezifischen Gesundheitsforschung, Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  25. 7.
    C. Helfferich and O. J. von Troschke, eds. (1993), Der Beitrag der Frauengesundheitsforschung zu den Gesundheitswissenschaften/Public Health in Deutschland. Freiburg: Schriftenreihe der Koordinierungsstelle Gesundheitswissenschaften/Public Health an der Abteilung Medizinische Soziologie der Universität Freiburg, Bd.2; U. Maschewsky-Schneider, ed. (1996), Frauen—das kranke Geschlecht? Mythos und Wirklichkeit, Leverkusen, Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar
  26. 8.
    DGPH—Deutsche Gesellschaft für Public Health, ed. (1999), Public Health Forschung in Deutschland, Bern-Göttingen-Toronto-Seattle: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  27. 9.
    G. Berg, U. Haertel, and U. Maschewsky-Schneider (1995), Frauengesundheitsforschung—eine Aufgabe von Public Health? Forum Public Health (10).Google Scholar
  28. 11.
    I. Klinge and M. Bosch (2001), Gender in Research: Gender Impact Assessment of the specific programs of the Fifth Framework Program, Quality of Life and Living Resources: A study for the European Commission, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  29. 13.
    National Committee for Medical Research Ethics in Norway, ed. (2001), Guidelines for the Inclusion of Women in Medical Research—Gender as a Variable in All Medical Research, http://www.etikkom.no/Etikkom/Engelsk/ Publications/women.
  30. 15.
    J. Fuchs, and U. Maschewsky-Schneider (2002), Geschlechtsangemessene Publikationspraxis in den Gesundheitswissenschaften im deutschsprachigen Raum?—Ergebnisse einer Literaturreview, Das Gesundheitswesen 64: 278–283; J. Fuchs and U. Maschewsky-Schneider (2003), Beruecksichtigung des GenderAspekts in der deutschsprachigen Public-Health-Forschung: Ergebnisse einer Projektbefragung. International Journal of Public Health 48: 227–233; U. Maschewsky-Schneider and J. Fuchs (2003), Gender bias—gender research in public health, in W. Kirch, ed., Public Health in Europe:10 years EUPHA, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 119–128.Google Scholar
  31. 16.
    M. Eichler (June 2001), Moving forward: Measuring gender bias and more, in Berlin Center of Public Health, European Women’s Health Network, German Society for Social Medicine and Prevention, eds., Gender Based Analysis (GBA) in Public Health Research, Policy and Practice, Documentation of the International Workshop, Berlin. http://www.ifg-gs.tuberlin.de/workshop/ workshop.phtml; M. Eichler, et al. (2002), Zu mehr Gleichberechtigung zwischen den Geschlechtern. Erkennen und Vermeiden von Gender Bias in der Gesundheitsforschung, in J. Fuchs, K. Maschewsky, and U. MaschewskySchneider, eds., Deutsche Uebersetzung und Bearbeitung. Berlin: Blaue Reihe-Berliner Zentrum Public Health. http://www.ifg-gs.tu-berlin.de/ handbuchGBA.pdf.
  32. 17.
    U. Maschewsky-Schneider, P. Rattay, and B. Sorg (2003), Umsetzung des Gender Mainstreaming-Ansatzes in der Gesundheitsvorsorge für Kinder und Jugendliche, in U. Koch and S. Pawils-Lechner, eds., Psychosoziale Versorgung in der Medizin, zugleich 2. Kongress für Versorgungsforschung, Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers, p. 205.Google Scholar
  33. 19.
    Gesundheitsbericht für Deutschland: Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes (1998), Statistisches Bundesamt. Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ilona Kickbusch, Kari A. Hartwig, and Justin M. List 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn M. Mazure

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations