The Impact of the Allied Occupation: Nishina and Nakasone

  • Morris Low


Jean-Jacques Salomon has written that throughout the world,

at the end of the war, the demobilization of researchers, far from signalling the end of “mobilized” science as such, gave rise, on the contrary, to systematic efforts to take advantage of research activities in the context of “national and international objectives.”1


Atomic Bomb Japanese Scientist Technical Division Preparatory Committee Japanese Laboratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jean-Jacques Salomon, “Science Policy Studies and the Development of Science Policy,” in Ina Spiegel-Rosing and Derek de Solla Price (eds), Science, Technology and Society: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective (London: Sage, 1977), pp. 43–70, esp. p. 48.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    William McGucken, Scientists, Society, and State: The Social Relations of Science Movement in Great Britain, 1931–1947 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1984), p. 307.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    J.A.A. Stockwin, “The Occupation: Continuity or Change?,” Asian and African Studies (Israel), vol. 18 (1984), pp. 27–40, esp. p. 35.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    They were, however, prohibited from making public their reports. By the end of 1946, around 80 reports had been compiled and submitted to SCAP. After drawn-out deliberations, some of the manuscripts were released in January 1949. It wasn’t until 1953, after the Occupation, that a collection of reports by the NRC group were published in Japanese. See Mitutomo Yuasa, Kagakushi (The History of Science) (Tokyo: Tōyō Keizai Shinpōsha, 1961), pp. 294–95;Google Scholar
  5. and Committee for the Compilation of Materials on Damage Caused by the Atomic Bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, trans. Eisei Ishikawa and David L. Swain, The Impact of the A-bomb: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945–85 (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1985), p. 199.Google Scholar
  6. Also, Monica Braw, The Atomic Bomb Suppressed: American Censorship in Japan, 1945–1949, Lund Studies in International History No. 23 (Malmo, Sweden: Liber Forlag, 1986), pp. 121, 127–28.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    For a discussion of this, see Theodore Cohen, edited by Herbert Passin, Remaking Japan: The American Occupation as New Deal (New York: Free Press, 1987), pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Meirion Harries and Susie Harries, Sheathing the Sword: The Demilitarisation of Japan (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1987), p. 21.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Chalmers Johnson, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982), p. 172. See also, “Japan: Who Governs? An Essay on Official Bureaucracy,” The Journal of Japanese Studies, vol. 2, no. 1 (autumn 1975), pp. 1–28, esp. p. 20.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    It should be pointed out that reforms “reflected the full range of the then American political spectrum: left, liberal, New Deal, mainline American, conservative, military.” Herbert Passin, “The Occupation: Some Reflections,” Daedalus, vol. 119, no. 3 (Summer 1990), pp. 107–129, esp. p. 114.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Robert Gilpin, “Introduction: Natural Scientists in Policymaking,” in Robert Gilpin and Christopher Wright (eds), Scientists and National Policy-Making (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964), pp. 1–18, esp. pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  12. Also see James L. Penick, Jr., Carroll W. Pursell, Jr., Morgan B. Sherwood, and Donald C. Swain (eds), The Politics of American Science, 1939 to the Present (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972 ed.), p. 120.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    Samuel K. Coleman, “Riken from 1945 to 1948: The Reorganization of Japan’s Physical and Chemical Research Institute under the American Occupation,” Technology and Culture, vol. 31, no. 2 (April 1990), pp. 228–50, esp. pp. 232–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 24.
    Shūji Fukui has commented on the destruction of what was mistaken to be a “baby cyclotron” at Osaka, making the number of cyclotrons there two, and the total number of cyclotrons seized five. Discussed at Fermilab Workshop on the History of Japanese Particle Physics, May 6–7, 1985. The bulk of the proceedings of the workshop can be found in Laurie M. Brown, Rokuo Kawabe, Michiji Konuma, and Zirō Maki (eds), Elementary Particle Theory in Japan, 1935–1960: Japan-USA Collaboration, Second Phase (Kyoto: Yukawa Hall Archival Library, Research Institute for Fundamental Physics, 1988).Google Scholar
  15. 26.
    William Lawren, The General and the Bomb: A Biography of General Leslie R. Groves, Director of the Manhattan Project (New York: Dodd, Mead and Co., 1988), p. 268.Google Scholar
  16. 34.
    Science Council of Japan, Annual Report, 1951–1958 (Tokyo, 1959), pp. 201–202.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    Robert Serber, The Los Alamos Primer: The First Lectures on How to Build, an Atomic Bomb (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), p. 93.Google Scholar
  18. 50.
    The name is only typed on the document. There may have been a simple typographical error. For background on Pash, see Christopher Simpson, Blowback: America’s Recruitment of Nazis and Its Effect on the Cold War (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988), pp. 152–53.Google Scholar
  19. 51.
    Richard Rhodes, The Making of the Atomic Bomb (London: Penguin Books, 1988), p. 606;Google Scholar
  20. Gregg Herken, Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller (New York: Owl Books, Henry Holt and Co., 2003), p. 96.Google Scholar
  21. 52.
    Robert Jungk, trans. James Cleugh, Brighter than a Thousand Suns: A Personal History of the Atomic Scientists (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1958);Google Scholar
  22. David C. Cassidy, Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg (New York: W.H. Freeman and Co., 1992);Google Scholar
  23. Samuel A. Goudsmit, with an Introduction by David Cassidy, Alsos (Woodbury, NY: AIP Press, 1996). Originally published New York: Henry Schuman, 1947; Mark Walker, German National Socialism and the Quest for Nuclear Power, 1939–1949 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 153–54, 157–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 55.
    Karl T. Compton, “Mission to Tokyo,” unpublished, typewritten manuscript, October 8, 1945, Institute Archives, MIT [T-N C738], courtesy of Prof R.W. Home, University of Melbourne. Also see James Phinney Baxter III, Scientists Against Time (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968), pp. 126, 410, 416.Google Scholar
  25. 56.
    L.N. Ridenour, “Science and the Federal Government,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 7 (February 1951), pp. 35–37,Google Scholar
  26. cited in Richard G. Hewlett and Francis Duncan, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Vol. II, 1947–1952: Atomic Shield (US Atomic Energy Commission, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 57.
    For one account of the period leading up to the establishment of the Science Council, see Shigeru Nakayama, “The American Occupation and the Science Council of Japan,” in E. Mendelsohn (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences: Essays in Honor of I. Bernard Cohen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 353–69.Google Scholar
  28. 60.
    “The Progress of the Renewal Movement Since the End of the War.” Typewritten report on National Research Council stationery, August 25, 1947. GHQ/SCAP records, ESS (B) 11599, National Diet Library, Tokyo. See also Japan Academy, Nihon Gakushiin shōshi (A Short History of the Japan Academy) (Tokyo: Japan Academy, 1980).Google Scholar
  29. 84.
    Samuel K. Coleman, “Riken from 1945 to 1948: The Reorganization of Japan’s Physical and Chemical Research Institute under the American Occupation,” Technology and Culture, vol. 31, no. 2 (April 1990), pp. 228–50, esp. pp. 238–39, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. See also R.W. Home and Masao Watanabe, “Forming New Physics Communities: Australia and Japan, 1914–1950,” Annals of Science, vol. 47 (1990), pp. 317–45, esp. p. 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 87.
    For one account, see Hidehiko Tamaki, “Kagaku Kenkyūjo to Nishina sensei” (“The Scientific Research Institute and Dr. Nishina”), Kagaku, vol. 21, no. 4 (April 1951), pp. 212–15; also Coleman, “Riken from 1945 to 1948,” pp. 244–45.Google Scholar
  32. 96.
    Takatoshi Ito, The Japanese Economy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992), p. 68.Google Scholar
  33. 98.
    Braw, The Atomic Bomb Suppressed, p. 81. The “Red Purge” in the private sector involved 11,000 persons being made redundant during July-October 1950. Cohen, Remaking Japan, p. 449. The purge in the communications area is said to have occurred much earlier, between August 1947 and May 1948. See Jay Rubin, “From Wholesomeness to Decadence: The Censorship of Literature under the Allied Occupation,” Journal of Japanese Studies, vol. 11, no. 1 (1985), pp. 71–103, esp. p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 100.
    Yoshio Nishina, “Genshiryoku to heiwa” (“Atomic Energy and Peace”), in Yomiuri Shinbun, Science Section (ed.), Genshiryoku bunmei (Atomic Culture) (Tokyo: Takayama Shoin, 1949), pp. 1–8, esp. pp. 1–2, my translation.Google Scholar
  35. 101.
    Fumio Yamazaki, “A Short Biography of Dr. Yoshio Nishina,” in Sin-itirō Tomonaga and Hidehiko Tamaki (eds), Nishina Yoshio: Denki to kaisō (Yoshio Nishina: Biography and Reminiscences) (Tokyo: Misuzu Shobō, 1952), pp. 3–15, esp. p. 14.Google Scholar
  36. 102.
    Satoshi Aoki, Dokyumento: Nakasone Famarii (A Documented Account: The Nakasone “Family” (Tokyo: Akebi Shobō, 1986), pp. 33, 42.Google Scholar
  37. 103.
    Nathaniel B. Thayer, How the Conservatives Rule Japan (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969, 1973), p. 7.Google Scholar
  38. 104.
    Citation from Gendai (February 1978), in Michitaka Kido, Nakasone no kokka kaizō keikaku hihan (Criticism of Nakasone’s Plans for Rebuilding the Nation) (Tokyo: Senshinsha, 1986), pp. 129–30.Google Scholar
  39. 106.
    Kenzō Uchida, “Nakasone: Rear Guard or Vanguard?,” Japan Echo, vol. 10, no. 1 (1983), pp. 19–23, esp. p. 22.Google Scholar
  40. 107.
    Michitaka Kido, Nakasone no kokka kaizō keikaku hihan (Criticism of Nakasone’s Plans for Rebuildinq the Nation) (Tokyo: Senshinsha, 1986), p. 130.Google Scholar
  41. 109.
    John Welfield, An Empire in Eclipse: Japan in the Postwar American Alliance System: A Study in the Interaction of Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy (London: Athlone Press, 1988), pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
  42. 110.
    Michael Schaller, The American Occupation of Japan: The Origins of the Cold War in Asia (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 9–19, 92–94.Google Scholar
  43. 112.
    Gerald L. Curtis, The Japanese Way of Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  44. 113.
    Takeshi Ishida and Ellis S. Krauss, “Democracy in Japan: Issues and Questions,” in Takeshi Ishida and Ellis S. Krauss (eds), Democracy in Japan (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1989), pp. 3–16, esp. p. 10.Google Scholar
  45. 116.
    Ken’ichi Nakamura, “Militarization of Post-war Japan,” in Yoshikazu Sakamoto (ed.), Asia: Militarization and Regional Conflict (Tokyo: United Nations University; London: Zed Books, 1988), pp. 81–100, esp. p. 99.Google Scholar
  46. 117.
    Masao Kobayashi, Saishō Nakasone Yasuhiro: Naikaku sōri daijin e no sokuseki (Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone: The Road to the Prime Ministership) (Tsu: Ise Shinbunsha, 1985), pp. 703–709.Google Scholar
  47. 118.
    Kenneth B. Pyle, “In Pursuit of a Grand Design: Nakasone Betwixt the Past and the Future,” The Journal of Japanese studies, vol. 13, no. 2 (Summer 1987), pp. 243–70, esp. p. 251; Nakamura, “Militarization of Post-war Japan,” pp. 81–100, esp. p. 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 120.
    Michael Schaller, Douglas MacArthur: The Far Eastern General (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, 1990).Google Scholar
  49. 123.
    Yasuhiro Nakasone, “Kagaku Gijutsu Chō setsuritsu made no omoide” (“Memories up until the Establishment of the Science and Technology Agency”), in Science and Technology Agency, Kagaku Gijutsu Chō: 30 nen no ayumi (The Science and Technology Agency: A 30 Year History) (Tokyo: Sōzō, 1986), pp. 94–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Morris Low 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morris Low
    • 1
  1. 1.Johns Hopkins UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations