Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Culture and Religion in International Relations ((CRIR))

  • 292 Accesses

Abstract

Conflict and cooperation have always been a key part of the study of international relations since the discipline started after World War I. The role of religious non-state actors has been most noticeable in activity to promote international cooperation through peacebuilding, conflict resolution, faith-based diplomacy, interfaith dialogue, and economic development; some of these issues are examined in the next few chapters.

So in the name of Christian principles and the prophetic tradition I have argued the necessity of destroying the moralistic arrogance of the concept of a just and durable peace in a situation in which tragedy and possible grace are the only categories that can be applied to the present disrupted world. 1

—Paul Tillich

Response to John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State (1953–1959), Head of the Commission on a Just and Durable Peace (1943)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Paul Tillich, “Christian Basis of a Just and Durable Peace (1943),” in Ronald H. Stone (ed.), Theology of Peace (Louisville, KY: Westminster Press/John Knox Press, 1990), 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Keohane, “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” in James Der Derian (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations (London: Macmillan, 1995), 279–307.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barry Buzan, “From International System to International Society: Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,” International Organisation, 47, 3 (1993): 327–352;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barry Buzan, Charles Jones, and Richard Little, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alain Woodrow, “Europe without God,” The Tablet, June 21, 2003: 8; Alain Woodrow, “Battlelines over the new Europe,” The Tablet, May 24, 2003: 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin Wight, Systems of States (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977), 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholas J. Rengger, “Culture, Society, and Order in World Politics,” in John Baylis and Nicholas J. Rengger (eds.), Dilemmas of World Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roger Epp, “The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection,” Review of International Studies, 24, 3 (1998): 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedley Bull and Adam Watson, “Conclusion,” in Hedley Bull and Adam Watson (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), 425–435.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. J. Vincent, “Edmund Burke and the Theory of International Relations,” Review of International Studies, 10 (1984), 205–218;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. J. Vincent, “The Cultural Factor in the Global International Order,” The Yearbook of World Affairs, 34 (1980): 252–264;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hedley Bull, Justice in International Relations, Hagley Lectures (Waterloo, Ontario: University of Waterloo, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. John Finn, “Human Rights in Vienna,” First Things, 37 (1993): 4–8;

    Google Scholar 

  14. George Weigel, “What Really Happened at Cairo, and Why,” in The 9 Lives of Population Control, ed. Michael Cromartie (Washington, D.C.: Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1995), 129–148;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mary Ann Glendon, “What Happened in Beijing,” First Things, 59 (1996): 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mary Ann Glendon, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: Free Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983);

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Meyer, and Volker Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Robert O. Keohane, “The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Change in the International Economic Regimes, 1967–1977,” in Ole R. Holsti, R. M. Siverson, and A. L. George (eds.), Change in the International System (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Charles P. Kindleberger, “Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides,” International Studies Quarterly, 25 (1981): 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Henry Kissinger, White House Tears (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walter Russell Mead, Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peter Alexis Gourevitch, “The Second Image Reversed,” International Organization, 32, 4 (1978): 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heather A. Warren, Theologians of a New World Order, Reinhold Niebuhr and the Christian Realists, 1920–1948 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard Devetak, “The Project of Modernity in International Relations Theory,” Millennium, 24, 1 (1995): 123–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. John Gerard Ruggie, “Introduction: What Makes the World Hang Together?” in John Gerard Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity (London: Routledge, 1998), 1–40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Robert Bellah, The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1975, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. John Ikenberry “Is American Multilateralism in Decline?” Perspectives on Politics, 1, 3 (2003): 533–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sydney E. Ahlstrom, A Religious History of the American People, vol. 2 (Garden City, NY: Image Books, 1975), 599–620.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Henry P. Van Dusen (ed.), The Spiritual Legacy of John Foster Dulles (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Suzanne Long (ed.), Partners for Justice and Peace: Ways for Christians to support the United Nations (London: CCBI, Inter-Church House/UNA-UK, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Graham Dale, God’s Politicians: the Christian Contribution to 100 Tears of Labour, foreword by Tony Blair (London: HarperCollins, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Charles C. Brown, Niebuhr and His Age: Reinhold Niebuhr’s Prophetic Role and Legacy (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. David Brooks, “A Man On a Gray Horse,” The Atlantic, September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richard Fox, Reinhold Niebuhr: A Biography (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987), 232–233.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Alan Wilkinson, Christian Socialism: Scott Holland to Tony Blair (London: SCM Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bernard K. Johnpoll, Pacifist’s Progress: Norman Thomas and the decline of American Socialism (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. G. Nicholas, The United Nations as a Political Institution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), for example, makes no mention of Christian Democracy or Catholic Social thought.

    Google Scholar 

  40. John G. Ruggie, “Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy,” in John G Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity (London: Routledge, 1998), 203–239;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Craig Parsons, “Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union,” International Organization, 56, 1 (2002): 47–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gonzalez, “Political Science’s Theoretical Blindspots,” quoting Paul Pierson, “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis,” Comparative Political Studies, 29, 2 (1996): 123–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gonzalez, “Political Science’s Theoretical Blindspots,” quoting Andrew Moravcsik, “Preferences and power in the European Community—a liberal intergovernmentalist approach,” Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 4 (1993): 473–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Austen Ivereigh, “Europe of the Heart,” The Tablet, May 15, 2004, 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daniel Philpott, Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 261–262.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See Bryan Hehir, Michael Walzer, Charles Krathammer, Louise Richardson, and Shibley Telhami, Liberty and Power: A Dialogue on Religion and U.S. Foreign Policy in an Unjust World (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Harriet A. Harris, “Theological Reflections on Religious Resurgence and International Stability: a Look at Protestant Evangelicalism,” in Ken R. Dark (ed.), Religion in International Relations (London: Macmillan, 2000), 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Scott M. Thomas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, S.M. (2005). “Creating a Just and Durable Peace”: Rethinking Religion and International Cooperation. In: The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973993_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics