Advertisement

In the Eye of the Storm: Explaining and Understanding Culture and Religion in International Relations

  • Scott M. Thomas
Part of the Culture and Religion in International Relations book series (CRIR)

Abstract

In chapter 2 we saw that it was a common set of assumptions about religion in social theory as well as the main theories of international relations that were at least partly responsible for the way culture and religion were marginalized in the study of international relations. What if it may not only be a matter of using the correct conceptual maps — theories or paradigms — to interpret what is taking place in world politics? The social scientific approach to the study of international relations assumes that there is an objective social world “out there” waiting to be discovered by the mapmaker or social scientist. All that is needed is study leave from teaching, enough funding, and an appropriate methodology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    William T. Cavanaugh, “Disciplined Imaginations of Space and Time,” in William T. Cavanaugh (ed.), Theopolitical Imagination: Discovering the Liturgy as a Political Act in an Age of Global Consumerism (London & New York: T & T Clark/Continuum, 2002), 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yosef Lapid, “The Third Debate,” International Studies Quarterly, 33 (1989): 235–254;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Yosef Lapid, “Through Dialogue to Engaged Pluralism: The Unfinished Business of the Third Debate,” International Studies Review, 5, 1 (2003): 128–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    Donald Polkinghorne, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Robert Wuthnow, “Understanding Religion and Politics,” Daedalus, 120, 3 (1991): 1–20.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sean O’Neill, “Britons Fall Victim to an Islamic Dream,” The Daily Telegraph, October 5, 2001;Google Scholar
  7. John Lichfield, “The Baker Street Connection,” The Independent on Sunday, October 7, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Ken Booth and Tim Dunne, “Worlds in Collision,” in Ken Booth and Tim Dunne (eds.), Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order (London: Palgrave, 2003), 1–26;Google Scholar
  9. Fred Halliday Two Hours that Shook the World: September 11, 2001: Causes and Consequences (London: Saqi Books, 2002).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martha Finnemore, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1996), 30–31.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robert Ted Gurr and Barbara Harff, Ethnic Conflict in World Politics (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    James F. Keeley “Toward a Foucauldian Analysis of International Regimes,” International Organization, 44 (1990): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    William E. Connolly, Why I Am Not a Secularist (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999);Google Scholar
  14. John Keane, “The Limits of Secularism,” in John L. Esposito and Azzaaam Tamini (eds.), Islam and Secularism in the Middle East (New York: New York University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Tim Dunne, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (London: Macmillan, 1998);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Richard Devetak, “Critical Theory, and Postmodernism,” in Scott Burchill et al. (eds.), Theories of International Relations (New York and London: Palgrave, 1996), 155–180 and 181–208.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    John Milbank, Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    Rudolf Bultmann, Jesus and the World (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1934, 1958), 3.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    Richard Devetak, “The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory,” Millennium, 24, 1 (1995): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 19.
    William T. Cavanaugh, “The City: Beyond Secular Parodies,” in John Milbank, Catherine Pickstock, and Graham Ward (eds.), Radical Orthodoxy (London: Routledge, 1999), 182–200.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    Jacques Derrida, “Faith and Knowledge: the Two Sources of ‘Religion’ at the Limits of Reason Alone,” in Jacques Derrida and Gianni Vattimo (eds.), Religion (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    Jim George, Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1994);Google Scholar
  24. David Campell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Fouad Ajami, The Arab Predicament: Arab Political Thought and Practice Since 1967 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 198.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Authority in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996);Google Scholar
  27. Martha Finnemore, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yosef Lapid, “Culture’s Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory” in Yosef Lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil (eds.), The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Lynne Rienner, 1996), 3–20.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jutta Weldes, Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Alexander Wendt, “Identity and Structural Change in International Politics,” in Yosef Lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil (eds.), The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1996), 47–64.Google Scholar
  31. 32.
    Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization, 46 (1992): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 33.
    Morton Kaplan, System and Process in International Politics (New York: Wiley, 1957).Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 36–40.Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    David Leheny “Symbols, Strategies, and Choices for International Relations Scholarship After September 11,” Dialog IO, Spring 2002, 57–70.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    John G Ruggie, “Epistemology, Ontology, and the Study of International Regimes,” in John G. Ruggie, Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), 93–95;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michael Dalton McCoy, Domestic Policy Narratives and International Relations Theory (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stanley Hauerwas and L. Gregory Jones (eds.), Why Narrative? Readings in Narrative Theology (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1997).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Emery Roe, Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice (Durham: Duke University, 1994);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. P. K. Manning and B. Cullum-Swan, “Narrative, Content, and Semiotic Analysis,” in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994), 187–200.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    This group includes Peter Kreeft, Gilbert Meilander, Stanley Hauerwas, Robert C. Evans, Jonathan Wilson, David W. Gill, and Mary Ann Glendon. See Mary Ann Glendon and David Blankenhorn (eds.), Seedbeds of Virtue (New York: Madison, 1995);Google Scholar
  42. Nancy Murphy, Brad J. Kallenberg, and Mark Thiessen Nation (eds.), Virtues and Practices in the Christian Tradition: Christian Ethics After MacIntyre (Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press, 1997);Google Scholar
  43. Roger Crisp and Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue-Ethics, Oxford Readings in Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997);Google Scholar
  44. Rosalind Hursthouse, On Virtue-Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  45. 41.
    Albert S. Yee, “The Causal Effects of Ideas on Policies,” International Organization, 50, 1 (1996): 69–108;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Michael C. Desch, “Cutlure Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies,” International Security, 232, 1 (1998): 141–170;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Craig Parsons, “Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union,” International Organization, 56, 1 (2002): 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 42.
    Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd edition (London: Duckworth, 1985) and Whose Justice? Which Rationality) (London: Duckworth, 1988).Google Scholar
  49. 43.
    Max Weber, “The Social Psychology of the World Religions,” in H. H. Girth and C. Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), 267–301;Google Scholar
  50. Clifford Geertz, “Religion as a Cultural System,” in Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 87–125.Google Scholar
  51. 44.
    Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice, Which Rationality? (London: Duckworth, 1988), 354–355.Google Scholar
  52. 45.
    Talal Asad, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  53. Bruce Lincoln, Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  54. 46.
    Hans W. Frei, The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974),Google Scholar
  55. George A. Lindbeck, The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1984);Google Scholar
  56. Stanley Hauerwas, A Community of Character: Towards a Constructive Christian Ethic (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  57. 47.
    Friedrich Kratochwil, Rules, Norms, and Decisions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nicholas Onuf, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  59. 48.
    Charles Tilly, The Politics of Collective Violence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 26–54.Google Scholar
  60. 49.
    Erik Ringmar, Identity, Interest, and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Tears War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 52.
    Michael J. Sandel, Democracy’s Discontents: America’s Search for a Public Philosophy (New York: Belknop Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  62. 54.
    Jacques Maritain, The Dream of Descartes (reprint, 1944, Port Washington, New York: Kinnikat Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  63. 55.
    Martin Hollis The Philosophy of Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994);Google Scholar
  64. Benjamin A. Most and Harvey Starr, Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  65. 56.
    Phillip Cary, Augustine’s Invention of the Inner Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  66. 58.
    Gerald Sorin, Irving Howe: A Life of Passionate Dissent (New York: New York University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  67. 61.
    Paul Kowert and Jeffrey Legro, “Norms, Identity, and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise,” in Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 451–497;Google Scholar
  68. John Gerard Ruggie, “Multilateralism at Century’s End,” in John Gerard Ruggie (ed.), Constructing the World Polity (New York and London: Routledge, 1998), 102–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 62.
    Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991): 82–88, 176–181.Google Scholar
  70. 63.
    Finnemore, National Interests in International Society, James G Marsh and Johan P. Olsen, “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization, 52, 4 (1998): 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 64.
    Michael Donelan (ed.), The Reason of States (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1978);Google Scholar
  72. James Mayall (ed.), A Community of States (London: Pinter, 1982).Google Scholar
  73. 66.
    Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  74. 67.
    Oded Lowenheim, “‘Do Ourselves Credit and Render a Lasting Service to Mankind’: British Moral Prestige, Humanitarian Intervention, and the Barbary Pirates,” International Studies Quarterly, 47, 1 (2003): 23–48;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Chaim Kaufmann and Robert Pape, “Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain’s Sixty Year Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade,” International Organization, 53, 4 (1999): 631–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 68.
    David Lumsdaine, Moral Vision and International Politics, the Foreign Aid Regime, 1949–1989 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  77. 69.
    Steve Smith, “Wendt’s World,” Review of International Studies, 26, 1 (2000): 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Scott M. Thomas 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott M. Thomas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations