Introduction: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century

  • Scott M. Thomas
Part of the Culture and Religion in International Relations book series (CRIR)


Three momentous events in international relations — the Iranian Revolution, the rise of Solidarity and the Polish Revolution, and the tragedy of September 11, 2001 indicate how a global resurgence of religion is transforming our understanding of international relations.


Civil Society International Relation Religious Tradition Soft Power Economic Interdependence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fred Halliday Iran: Dictatorship and Development (London: Pelican, 1979).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barry Rubin, Paved with Good Intentions: the American Experience and Iran (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980);Google Scholar
  3. John Stempel, deputy chief of the Political Section, Inside the Iranian Revolution (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Zbigniew Brzezinski, Power and Principle (New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, 1983, 1985), 354–398.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Gary Sick, All Fall Down: America’s Fateful Encounter with Iran (London: I.B. Tauris, 1985).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    James E. Bill, The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian relations (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988), 417.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Moorhead Kennedy, The Ayatollah in the Cathedral (New York: Hill & Wang, 1986), 54–55.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Robert Wuthnow, “The World of Fundamentalism,” The Christian Century, April 22, 1992, 426–429.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Ray Takeyh, “Iran’s Emerging National Pact,” World Policy Journal, 19, 3 (2002): 43–50.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Thomas Powers, Intelligence Wars: American Secret History from Hitler to Al-Qaeda (New York: New York Review of Books, 2002).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Richard K. Herrmann and Richard Ted Lebow (eds.), Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation and the Study of International Relations (New York & London: Palgrave, 2004).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Robert V. Daniels, The End of the Communist Revolution (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Ian Clark, Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    George Weigel, The Final Revolution: The Resistance Church and the Collapse of Communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
  15. James Billington, “The Crisis of Communism and the Failure of Freedom,” Ethics and International Affairs, 5 (1991): 87–97;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. John Clark and Aaron Wildavsky The Moral Collapse of Communism: Poland as a Cautionary Tale (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    Patrick Michel, La societe retrouvee, politique et religion dans l’Europe sovietisee (Paris: Fayard, 1988).Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    Maryjane Osa, “Creating Solidarity: The Religious Foundations of the Polish Social Movement,” East European Politics and Societies, 11, 2 (1997): 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 16.
    Ted G Jelen and Clyde Wilcox, “Context and Conscience: The Catholic Church as an Agent of Political Socialization in Western Europe,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 1 (1998): 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    Adam Michnik, The Church and the Left, edited, translated, with an introduction by David Ost (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    George Weigel, Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II (New York: HarperCollins, 1999), 145–180.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Timothy Garton Ash, The Polish Revolution: Solidarity (New York: Vintage Press, 1985), 30.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    Edward Stourton, Absolute Truth: The Catholic Church in the World Today (London: Viking, 1998), 85–106.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    David Brooks, “Kicking the Secularist Habit,” The Atlantic Monthly, March 2003.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fareed Zakaria, “The Return of History,” in James F. Hodge and Gideon Rose (eds.), How Did This Happen? Terrorism and the New War (New York: Public Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, 2001), 307–317.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Francis Fukuyama, “History Is Still Going Our Way,” Wall Street Journal Europe, October 8, 2001; Robert L. Bartley “Thirty Years of Progress — Mostly,” Wall Street Journal Europe, November 29, 2002;; Michael Mandelbaum, The Ideas That Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy, and Free Markets in the Twenty-First Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Michael Walzer, “Can There Be a Decent Left?” Dissent (Spring 2002): 19–23.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Hashmi, “The Terrorists’ Zealotry is Political, Not Religious,” Washington Post, September 30, 2001;Google Scholar
  29. Fred Halliday Two Hours that Shook the World: Septmeber 11, 2001: Causes & Caonsequences (London: Saqi Books, 2002).Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Lael Brainard, “Textiles and Terrorism,” New York Times, December 27, 2001;Google Scholar
  31. Richard Sokolsky and Joseph McMillan, “A Robust Foreign Aid Program,” International Herald Tribune, February 13, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. 30.
    Christopher Hewitt, Understanding Terrorism in America From the Klan to Al Qaeda (New York and London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    Steven Simon and Daniel Benjamin, “America and the New Terrorism,” Survival, 42, 1 (2000), 59–75;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Daniel Banjamin and Steven Simon, The Age of Sacred Terror (New York: Random House, 2002);Google Scholar
  35. Oliver McTerman, Violence in God’s Name: Religion in an Age of Conflict (London: DLT, 2003).Google Scholar
  36. 33.
    Paul Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” The American Prospect, October 22, 2001;Google Scholar
  37. Paul Berman, Terror and Liberalism (London and New York: W.W. Norton, 2003).Google Scholar
  38. 34.
    Emilio Gentile, “The Sacralization of Politics: Definitions, Interpretations and Reflections on the Question of Secular Religion and Totalitarianism,” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 1, 1 (2000): 18–55;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roger Eatwell, “Reflections on Fascism and Religion,” in Leonard Weinberg and Ami Pedahzur (eds.), Religious Fundamentalism and Political Extremism (London: Frank Cass, 2004), 145–166.Google Scholar
  40. 35.
    Daniel Bell, “Revolutionary Terrorism: Three Justifications,” Correspondence (Council on Foreign Relations), 9 (2002): 15–16; Walter Laquer, “Left, Right, and Beyond: The Changing Face of Terror,” in Hodge and Rose (eds.), How Did This Happen? 71–82.Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    Josef Joffe, “The Meaning of Spain,” Time, March 29, 2004.Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    Robert Harris, “Forget Islam: Bin Laden Is No More Than a Spoilt Rich Kid,” The Daily Telegraph, October 9, 2001.Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    Andrew McKenna, “Scandal, Resentment, Idolatry: The Underground Psychology of Terrorism,” Anthropoetics—The Journal of Generative Anthropology, 8, 1 (2002) <>; “Bin Laden, Dostoevsky and the Reality Principle: An Interview With Andre Glucksmann,” <www.opendemocracynet/articles>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 39.
    Gabriel A. Almond, R. Scott Appleby, and Emmanuel Sivan, Strong Religion: The Rise of Fundamentalisms Around the World (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  45. 41.
    Fabio Petito and Pavlos Hatzopoulos (eds.), Religion in International Relations: The Return from Exile (New York & London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
  46. 42.
    Joseph Nye, “Soft Power,” Foreign Policy, 80 (1990): 153–171;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  48. Pierre Hassner, “Le role des idees dans les relations internationales,” Politique Estrangere, 65, 3/4 (2000): 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 43.
    Albert S. Yee, “The Causal Effects of Ideas on Policies,” International Organization, 50, 1 (1996): 69–108;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Michael C. Desch, “Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies,” International Security, 232, 1 (1998): 141–170;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Craig Parsons, “Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union,” International Organization, 56, 1 (2002): 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 44.
    Christian Smith (ed.), Disruptive Religion: The Force of Faith in Social-Movement Activism (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
  53. 45.
    R. Scott Appleby, The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation (Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield, 2000).Google Scholar
  54. 46.
    Richard John Neuhaus, The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1986).Google Scholar
  55. 47.
    Harry Bauer and Elisabetta Brighi (eds.), International Relations at LSE: A History of 75 Years, foreword by James Mayall (London: Millennium Publishing Group, 2003).Google Scholar
  56. 48.
    Tim Dunne, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (London: Macmillan, 1998);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. B. A. Roberson (ed.), International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory (London: Pinter, 1998).Google Scholar
  58. 49.
    Scott M. Thomas, “Faith, History, and Martin Wight: The Role of Religion in the Historical Sociology of the English School of International Relations,” International Affairs, 77, 4 (2001): 905–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Scott M. Thomas 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott M. Thomas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations